Kaydın tarihi bana hâlâ kuşkulu geliyor.

This is a very common Turkish noun phrase pattern.

• kaydın = of the record
• tarihi = its date / the date

Together, kaydın tarihi means the date of the record or the record’s date.

This structure is called a genitive-possessive construction:

• first noun: gets the genitive ending → kaydın
• second noun: gets the 3rd person possessive ending → tarihi

So the pattern is:

X-in Y-si = the Y of X

Examples:

• evin kapısı = the door of the house
• öğrencinin kitabı = the student’s book
• kaydın tarihi = the date of the record

Because of a common sound change in Turkish called consonant softening.

The dictionary form is:

• kayıt = record

When a vowel-initial suffix is added, the final t often becomes d:

• kayıt
  • -ın → kaydın

This happens in many words:

• kanat → kanadı
• ağaç → ağacı
• kitap → kitabı

So kaydın is the expected form, not kayıtın.

Here, -i is the 3rd person possessive suffix.

• tarih = date / history
• tarihi = its date / the date of it

In kaydın tarihi, the second noun needs that possessive ending because Turkish marks both parts of this kind of relationship:

• kaydın = of the record
• tarihi = its date

So this is not just date by itself; it is the record’s date.

bana means to me.

It is the dative form of ben:

• ben = I
• bana = to me

In this sentence, it shows whose impression or opinion is being expressed.

So:

• bana kuşkulu geliyor = seems suspicious to me

This is very natural in Turkish. Turkish often uses the dative with verbs of seeming/feeling:

• Bana garip geliyor. = It seems strange to me.
• Bana doğru geliyor. = It seems right to me.

Excellent question. In Turkish, gelmek often has meanings beyond physical movement.

Here, ... gibi geliyor or ... geliyor can mean:

• to seem
• to feel
• to come across as

So kuşkulu geliyor does not mean comes suspicious in a literal English sense. It means:

• seems suspicious
• strikes me as suspicious

This is a very common Turkish pattern:

• Bana zor geliyor. = It seems difficult to me.
• Bu fikir mantıklı geliyor. = This idea seems logical.
• Bu açıklama inandırıcı gelmiyor. = This explanation doesn’t seem convincing.

Because Turkish normally puts the finite verb at the end.

So the sentence is structured like this:

• Kaydın tarihi = the date of the record
• bana = to me
• hâlâ = still
• kuşkulu = suspicious
• geliyor = seems

Literally, the order is something like:

The record’s date to me still suspicious seems.

That sounds strange in English, but it is very normal in Turkish.

kuşkulu means something like:

• suspicious
• questionable
• dubious
• doubtful

In this sentence, it describes the date, not a person. So it means the date seems unreliable, odd, or not fully believable.

It does not mean that the date itself is doing the suspecting. It means the speaker finds the date suspicious.

hâlâ means still.

It shows that this impression continues from before until now.

So:

• bana kuşkulu geliyor = seems suspicious to me
• bana hâlâ kuşkulu geliyor = still seems suspicious to me

This suggests the speaker had doubts earlier and continues to have them.

The correct standard spelling is Kaydın tarihi.

That is because:

• base word: kayıt
• with the genitive suffix: kaydın

The vowel ı in kayıt is still there, but the final consonant changes:

• kayıt → kaydın

So you should not write kayıdın. The correct form is kaydın.

Turkish does not use a definite article like English the.

Definiteness is usually understood from context or from the structure itself.

So:

• kaydın tarihi naturally means the date of the record not just a date of a record

This is one reason Turkish can look shorter or more compact than English.

In theory, tarih can mean both date and history, depending on context. But in this sentence, tarihi is understood as date, because:

• a record’s history would be a less natural interpretation here
• kuşkulu geliyor strongly suggests that some specific detail, like a date, seems questionable

So in this context, kaydın tarihi is best understood as the date of the record.

It expresses a personal impression, not a direct factual claim.

That is because of bana and geliyor:

• bana = to me
• geliyor = seems

So the sentence means the speaker is saying:

• It seems suspicious to me
• I find it suspicious

This is softer and more subjective than directly saying:

• Kaydın tarihi kuşkulu. = The record’s date is suspicious.

The version with bana ... geliyor leaves more room for personal judgment.

Turkish word order is flexible, but different orders change emphasis.

The neutral order here is:

• Kaydın tarihi bana hâlâ kuşkulu geliyor.

Other orders are possible, for example:

• Bana kaydın tarihi hâlâ kuşkulu geliyor.
• Kaydın tarihi hâlâ bana kuşkulu geliyor.

These are still understandable, but they shift what is emphasized.

In most learning contexts, it is best to treat the original sentence as a natural, standard word order: subject/topic + indirect object + adverb + predicate + verb.