Breakdown of Bu açıklama bana oldukça inandırıcı geldi.
Questions & Answers about Bu açıklama bana oldukça inandırıcı geldi.
Why is bana used here?
Bana means to me. It is the dative form of ben (I).
- ben = I
- bana = to me
In this sentence, Turkish uses bana ... geldi to express the idea of it seemed/felt to me.
So:
- Bu açıklama bana inandırıcı geldi
= This explanation seemed convincing to me
This is a very common pattern in Turkish:
- Bana ilginç geldi = It seemed interesting to me
- Bana garip geldi = It seemed strange to me
- Bana doğru geldi = It seemed right to me
Why does geldi mean something like seemed here? Doesn’t it literally mean came?
Yes, geldi literally means came, from gelmek (to come). But in Turkish, birine + adjective + gelmek is a common expression meaning:
- to seem ... to someone
- to strike someone as ...
- to feel ... to someone
So inandırıcı geldi is not about physical movement. It means:
- seemed convincing
- struck me as convincing
This is an idiomatic use of gelmek.
Examples:
- Bana mantıklı geldi = It seemed logical to me
- Bana zor geldi = It seemed difficult to me
- Bana samimi geldi = It seemed sincere to me
What does oldukça mean here?
Oldukça usually means quite, rather, or fairly.
In this sentence, it modifies inandırıcı:
- oldukça inandırıcı = quite convincing
It adds degree, but not usually as strongly as çok.
Rough comparison:
- inandırıcı = convincing
- oldukça inandırıcı = quite/fairly convincing
- çok inandırıcı = very convincing
Depending on context, oldukça can sound a little neutral or measured, like the speaker is making a reasonable judgment rather than a very emotional one.
What does inandırıcı mean, and how is it formed?
İnandırıcı means convincing or persuasive.
It comes from the verb inandırmak, which means to convince or literally to cause someone to believe.
A simplified breakdown:
- inanmak = to believe
- inandırmak = to convince / to make someone believe
- inandırıcı = convincing
The suffix -ıcı / -ici / -ucu / -ücü often forms words meaning something like:
- that does X
- tending to X
- causing X
So inandırıcı is something that causes belief: convincing.
Why is there no word for is/was in the sentence?
Because the sentence is not built with a simple to be structure. Instead, it uses the verb gelmek idiomatically:
- bana inandırıcı geldi
= it seemed convincing to me
So the main verb is geldi, not a hidden version of to be.
If you wanted a plain sentence with is, you could say:
- Bu açıklama oldukça inandırıcı.
= This explanation is quite convincing.
But the original sentence is slightly different in meaning:
- Bu açıklama oldukça inandırıcı geldi.
= This explanation seemed quite convincing.
That sounds more like a personal impression or evaluation.
Why is the word order Bu açıklama bana oldukça inandırıcı geldi?
This is a very natural Turkish word order.
Breakdown:
- Bu açıklama = this explanation
- bana = to me
- oldukça inandırıcı = quite convincing
- geldi = seemed
Turkish usually puts the main verb at the end, so geldi comes last.
A very literal structure would be:
- This explanation to me quite convincing seemed
That said, Turkish word order is flexible. You could also hear:
- Bu açıklama oldukça inandırıcı geldi bana.
- Bana bu açıklama oldukça inandırıcı geldi.
These versions are all possible, but the original is neutral and natural.
Could I say Bu açıklama bana inandırıcı oldu instead?
Not in the same way. Oldu and geldi are different here.
- inandırıcı geldi = seemed convincing
- inandırıcı oldu = became convincing / turned out convincing
So geldi is about your impression. Oldu suggests a change or result.
Compare:
- Bana inandırıcı geldi = It seemed convincing to me
- Sonunda inandırıcı oldu = In the end, it became convincing
For the meaning in your sentence, geldi is the natural choice.
Is bu açıklama definitely this explanation? Could it mean that explanation?
Bu means this, not that.
So:
- bu açıklama = this explanation
- şu açıklama = that explanation / that explanation there
- o açıklama = that explanation
A native English speaker may notice that Turkish demonstratives do not always match English perfectly in every situation, but in a basic sense:
- bu = this
- şu / o = that
So here, bu açıklama is clearly this explanation.
What case is açıklama in? Why doesn’t it have an ending?
Açıklama is in the nominative form, which is the basic dictionary form. It is the subject of the sentence.
- Bu açıklama = this explanation
No extra ending is needed because it is not:
- a direct object in definite accusative form
- possessed
- in dative, locative, ablative, etc.
The sentence is basically saying:
- This explanation seemed quite convincing to me.
So bu açıklama is simply the thing being talked about.
Why is oldukça before inandırıcı?
Because oldukça is an adverb modifying the adjective inandırıcı.
In Turkish, adverbs usually come before the word they modify.
So:
- oldukça inandırıcı = quite convincing
- çok güzel = very beautiful
- biraz zor = a little difficult
This is very similar to English word order:
- quite convincing
- very beautiful
- a little difficult
Can bana be omitted?
Yes, if the context already makes it clear whose impression it is. But omitting it changes the feel of the sentence.
- Bu açıklama oldukça inandırıcı geldi.
= This explanation seemed quite convincing.
This can still imply the speaker’s opinion, but bana makes it explicit:
- Bu açıklama bana oldukça inandırıcı geldi.
= This explanation seemed quite convincing to me.
Including bana is useful when you want to emphasize that this is your personal impression, not necessarily an objective fact.
What tense is geldi here?
Geldi is in the simple past tense.
- gelmek = to come
- geldi = came
In this idiomatic use, it means:
- seemed
- felt
- struck me as
So the sentence describes a past impression:
- It seemed quite convincing to me
This does not necessarily mean the explanation belongs to the distant past; Turkish often uses the simple past for a completed reaction or judgment.
Could I translate this as I found this explanation quite convincing?
Yes, that is a very good natural translation.
Possible natural English translations include:
- This explanation seemed quite convincing to me.
- I found this explanation quite convincing.
- This explanation struck me as quite convincing.
All of these capture the meaning well.
The Turkish sentence is especially close to the idea of it seemed to me, because of the bana ... geldi structure.
What is the difference between inandırıcı and ikna edici?
Both can be translated as convincing, but they are not always identical.
- inandırıcı often means believable, credible, convincing
- ikna edici is often closer to persuasive
So:
- inandırıcı açıklama = a believable/convincing explanation
- ikna edici konuşma = a persuasive speech
In many contexts they overlap, but inandırıcı often focuses more on whether something feels believable or credible.
In your sentence, inandırıcı is a very natural choice because the speaker is evaluating the explanation as believable.
Could the sentence be phrased more simply?
Yes. A simpler version would be:
- Bu açıklama inandırıcı geldi.
= This explanation seemed convincing.
Or:
- Bu açıklama bana inandırıcı geldi.
= This explanation seemed convincing to me.
The original sentence adds oldukça, which makes the judgment more specific:
- not just convincing
- but quite convincing
So the full sentence sounds a little more nuanced and polished.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning TurkishMaster Turkish — from Bu açıklama bana oldukça inandırıcı geldi to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions