Akşam rüzgar çıkınca perde yine dalgalandı.

Çıkınca is built from:

• çık- = to come out, rise, appear, start up
• -ınca / -ince / -unca / -ünce = a suffix meaning when, once, or after

So rüzgar çıkınca means something like:

• when the wind came up
• once the wind started
• when it got windy

In this sentence, -ınca introduces a time clause: one event happens, and then the main event follows.

That is a very common question. Çıkmak has many meanings in Turkish, and with weather or natural events it often means to arise, to start up, or to appear.

So:

• rüzgar çıktı = the wind came up
• not the wind exited

This is an idiomatic Turkish expression. English and Turkish describe natural events differently:

• English: the wind picked up / the wind started blowing
• Turkish: rüzgar çıktı

So here çıkmak is not about physical خروج/exit; it is about the wind beginning or becoming noticeable.

In Turkish, many time words can be used directly as adverbs without any extra ending.

So akşam can mean:

• evening
• in the evening
• toward evening, depending on context

That is why Akşam rüzgar çıkınca... is natural.

Compare:

• Sabah geldim. = I came in the morning.
• Akşam ararım. = I’ll call in the evening.

Turkish often leaves this very compact.

There are really two clauses here, and each has its own subject:

1. Akşam rüzgar çıkınca

   • subject: rüzgar = the wind

2. perde yine dalgalandı

   • subject: perde = the curtain

So the full structure is:

• When the wind came up in the evening, the curtain fluttered again.

A learner may expect the same subject in both parts, but Turkish does not require that with -ınca clauses. Different subjects are completely possible.

Yes, but it is normal Turkish word order.

Turkish often places:

1. time information first
2. subordinate clause next
3. main clause after that
4. the verb at the end

So this pattern is very natural:

• Akşam rüzgar çıkınca = time/subordinate clause
• perde yine dalgalandı = main clause

A rough structure is:

• [When the wind came up in the evening] [the curtain again fluttered].

Could the order change? Yes, sometimes. But this version sounds very natural and smooth.

Yine usually means again or once again.

In this sentence, it suggests repetition:

• the curtain had fluttered before
• and now it fluttered again

Depending on context, yine can sometimes also feel like still or yet again, but here again is the most straightforward sense.

Its position is also natural:

• perde yine dalgalandı

It sits before the verb and modifies the whole action.

Dalgalandı breaks down like this:

• dalgalan- = to wave, ripple, sway, flutter
• -dı / -di / -du / -dü = simple past tense

So dalgalandı means:

• fluttered
• waved
• swayed

The simple past here presents the action as a completed event in the past.

A learner might compare:

• dalgalandı = it fluttered
• dalgalanıyordu = it was fluttering
• dalgalanmıştı = it had fluttered

So the chosen form gives a simple past narrative feel.

Turkish has no direct articles equivalent to English the and a/an.

So perde by itself can mean:

• the curtain
• a curtain

The context decides which one sounds right in English.

In this sentence, English will usually say the curtain, because it sounds like a specific curtain already known from the situation. But grammatically, Turkish simply uses the bare noun perde.

Also, because there is no plural ending -ler / -lar, it is singular:

• perde = curtain
• perdeler = curtains

Yes, rüzgar esince would also be possible, but the nuance is a little different.

• rüzgar esmek = the wind blows
• rüzgar çıkmak = the wind comes up, starts, picks up

So:

• rüzgar esince focuses on the wind blowing
• rüzgar çıkınca focuses more on the wind arising or starting up

In many contexts, both are natural. This sentence uses çıkınca because it gives the sense that the wind started or strengthened, and then the curtain fluttered.

In English, a comma is very often used after an opening when clause:

• When the wind came up in the evening, the curtain fluttered again.

In Turkish, punctuation is often lighter. A comma after çıkınca is possible, especially if the writer wants a pause:

• Akşam rüzgar çıkınca, perde yine dalgalandı.

But leaving it out is also completely normal:

• Akşam rüzgar çıkınca perde yine dalgalandı.

So this is mostly a style and rhythm issue, not a grammar problem.