Breakdown of Kedinin tüyleri koltuğa yapışınca kılıfı yıkadım.
Questions & Answers about Kedinin tüyleri koltuğa yapışınca kılıfı yıkadım.
Why is kedinin used instead of just kedi?
Because kedinin has the genitive ending -in, which marks the possessor.
- kedi = cat
- kedinin = the cat’s
In Turkish, possession is usually shown with a two-part structure:
- the possessor gets the genitive
- the possessed noun gets a possessive ending
So:
- kedinin tüyleri = the cat’s fur/hairs
This is a very common Turkish pattern.
Why not say kedi tüyleri instead of kedinin tüyleri?
Because the two expressions are similar but not identical.
- kedi tüyleri = cat hair/fur in a more general sense, like cat hairs
- kedinin tüyleri = the fur/hairs of a specific cat
In this sentence, we are talking about hair from a particular cat, so kedinin tüyleri is the better choice.
Why is it tüyleri and not just tüyler or tüyü?
Because the noun being possessed must also show possession.
- tüyler = hairs/fur
- tüyleri = its hairs / the cat’s hairs
Here, tüyleri contains:
- tüy = hair, fur, feather
- -ler = plural
- -i = 3rd person possessive
So kedinin tüyleri literally works like the cat’s its-hairs, which is how Turkish builds the cat’s fur/hair.
As for tüyü, that would be singular possessed: its hair/feather. But in a sentence about loose hair sticking to furniture, tüyleri sounds very natural.
Does tüyleri really mean plural? Why is it often translated as singular fur or hair?
Yes, it is grammatically plural here, but English and Turkish do not always package this idea the same way.
Turkish often uses a plural form when thinking about many separate hairs or strands:
- tüyleri = its hairs
But natural English may prefer:
- the cat’s fur
- the cat’s hair
So the Turkish form can be plural even when the best English translation sounds singular.
Why is it koltuğa?
Because yapışmak takes the dative case, meaning to stick to something.
- koltuk = sofa, armchair, seat
- koltuğa = to the sofa / to the chair
So:
- koltuğa yapışmak = to stick to the sofa
A learner might expect koltukta, but that would mean on/in the sofa as a location, not the target of sticking.
Also notice the sound change:
- koltuk + a → koltuğa
The final k softens to ğ before a vowel-initial suffix.
What does yapışınca mean?
Yapışınca comes from:
- yapış- = stick, adhere
- -ınca / -ince = when, once, after, sometimes because
So yapışınca means something like:
- when it stuck
- once it stuck
- after it stuck
Depending on context, it can even feel a bit like since/because it stuck.
In this sentence, it introduces the background event: When the cat’s fur stuck to the sofa, I washed the cover.
Why is it yapışmak and not yapıştırmak?
Because these are different verbs.
- yapışmak = to stick, to become attached
- yapıştırmak = to make something stick, to stick something onto something
So:
- Tüyler koltuğa yapıştı. = The hairs stuck to the sofa.
- Tüyleri koltuğa yapıştırdı. = He/she stuck the hairs onto the sofa.
In your sentence, the fur is the thing that got stuck by itself, so yapışmak is correct.
Why is kılıfı marked with -ı?
Here -ı is the accusative ending, marking a definite/specific direct object.
- kılıf = cover
- kılıfı = the cover
So:
- kılıfı yıkadım = I washed the cover
Turkish often marks direct objects this way when they are specific or already known from context.
Compare:
- kılıfı yıkadım = I washed the cover
- bir kılıf yıkadım = I washed a cover
Could kılıfı mean its cover instead of the cover?
Yes, by itself kılıfı can be ambiguous.
It can look like:
- kılıf + ı = the cover, as an accusative object or
- a possessed form meaning its cover
But in this sentence, it is normally understood as the cover.
If you wanted to say its cover as the object more clearly, Turkish would often use:
- kılıfını = its cover + accusative
And if you wanted to be very explicit:
- koltuğun kılıfını = the sofa’s cover
What does yıkadım break down into?
Yıkadım breaks down like this:
- yıka- = wash
- -dı = past tense
- -m = first person singular
So:
- yıkadım = I washed
This is one reason Turkish often does not need a separate subject pronoun.
Why is there no separate word for I?
Because the verb already tells you the subject.
In yıkadım, the ending -m means I.
So Turkish can simply say:
- yıkadım = I washed
You can add ben if you want emphasis or contrast:
- Ben yıkadım. = I washed it.
But in an ordinary sentence, the pronoun is usually omitted.
Is the word order fixed in this sentence?
Not completely, but the given order is very natural.
The sentence is arranged as:
- subordinate clause
- object
- main verb
So:
- Kedinin tüyleri koltuğa yapışınca kılıfı yıkadım.
This is a normal Turkish pattern.
Turkish word order is flexible, so parts can move for emphasis. For example:
- Kılıfı, kedinin tüyleri koltuğa yapışınca yıkadım.
That still means roughly the same thing, but puts more focus on kılıfı.
The main verb usually stays near the end.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning TurkishMaster Turkish — from Kedinin tüyleri koltuğa yapışınca kılıfı yıkadım to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions