Learn Hardcore Turkish: Çiçekler solsa bile saksıyı değiştirmeyelim. - Even if the flowers wither, let’s not change the pot.

It means even, giving a concessive meaning. So solsa bile = “even if (they) wither.” It signals that the main clause still holds under that unfavorable condition. You could also say solsa da with almost the same meaning; bile is a bit more emphatic than -sa da.

Why is it solsa (singular) even though çiçekler is plural? Can I say solsalar?

Turkish often leaves 3rd-person verbs in the singular when the subject is plural, especially with non-human subjects. So Çiçekler solsa is perfectly normal. Solsalar is also grammatical, but it’s more common with human subjects or when you want to highlight plurality; with flowers, solsa is more natural.

What’s the difference between solsa and solarsa?

solsa: conditional on the bare stem; often sounds more hypothetical and is very common in concessive patterns like X-sa bile.
solarsa: aorist + conditional; feels more like a real, open condition (“if/when they wither”).
Both work with bile: Çiçekler solsa bile… (more hypothetical) vs Çiçekler solarsa bile… (more neutral/future-like).

How is değiştirmeyelim formed?

Breakdown:

değiştir- = to change (something)
-me- = negative
-yelim = “let’s” (1st-person plural imperative/optative; appears as -yelim after the negative)
So: değiştir-me-yelim → “let’s not change.” The affirmative is değiştirelim (“let’s change”).

Why is it saksıyı (accusative)? Could it just be saksı?

Accusative marks a specific/definite direct object. saksıyı değiştirmeyelim = “let’s not change the (known) pot.”
If you say saksı değiştirmeyelim, it sounds like “let’s not change pots (in general / any pot),” which is a different nuance.

Should it be saksısını (“its pot/their pot”) instead of saksıyı?

Use saksısını when you want to mark possession explicitly, e.g., Çiçeklerin saksısını değiştirmeyelim (“let’s not change the flowers’ pot”).
Plain saksıyı just means “the pot” that both speakers recognize from context. Both are fine, depending on what you want to emphasize.

Where do I place bile? Could I move it?

bile follows the word it emphasizes.

In solsa bile, it emphasizes the whole condition (“even if [they] wither”).
Saksıyı bile değiştirmeyelim = “let’s not even change the pot” (focus on the pot).
Çiçekler bile solsa… = “even the flowers (of all things) wither…” Different focus, different meaning.

Does solsa bile mean “even if” or “even though”?

It can function like both, depending on context. If you want to make it clearly “even though (already happened)”, use a perfect form:

Çiçekler solmuş olsa bile saksıyı değiştirmeyelim. = “Even though the flowers have withered, let’s not change the pot.”

What’s the difference between değiştirmeyelim, değiştirmeyin, and değiştirme?

değiştirmeyelim: “let’s not change” (1st-person plural suggestion).
değiştirmeyin: “don’t change” (you plural / polite).
değiştirme: “don’t change” (you singular, informal).

Why not değişmeyelim?

değişmek is intransitive (“to change” by itself). We need the transitive değiştirmek (“to change something”) because we’re changing the pot. So only değiştirmeyelim is correct here.

Does değiştirmek really mean “to repot”? Is there a more precise verb?

In everyday speech, saksıyı değiştirmek or (çiçeği) başka bir saksıya almak is how people say “to repot.” You might also hear yeniden saksılamak. All are fine; saksıyı değiştirmek is common and clear.

Any pronunciation tips (ğ and ı are tricky)?

ı (dotless i) is a back, unrounded vowel, like the second vowel in “roses” for some speakers: saksıyı ≈ [sak-sɯ-yɯ].
ğ usually lengthens the preceding vowel rather than making a distinct sound: değiş- ≈ [deːʃ].
Stress typically falls near the end: de-ğiş-tir-me-ye-LİM.

Can I change the word order?

Yes. Common alternatives:

Çiçekler solsa bile, saksıyı değiştirmeyelim.
Saksıyı değiştirmeyelim, çiçekler solsa bile.
Moving parts changes emphasis but not the basic meaning.

Could I make the suggestion softer?

Yes, use the -sek/-sak optative:

Saksıyı değiştirmesek (bile olur)? = “How about not changing the pot?”
You can still keep the concession: Çiçekler solsa bile saksıyı değiştirmesek?

Do I have to use plural çiçekler, or could I say çiçek?

For this specific situation (a known pot with multiple flowers), çiçekler is natural. You could use singular for generic statements (e.g., Çiçek solar = “A/the flower withers” in a general sense), but here the plural aligns with the concrete, specific flowers in that pot.