Şefimiz masayı süsleyip tadım menüsünü açıkladı.

(Our chef decorated the table and announced the tasting menu.)

Breakdown of Şefimiz masayı süsleyip tadım menüsünü açıkladı.

• bizim: our
• masa: the table
• açıklamak: to announce
• şef: the chef
• süslemek: to decorate
• tadım menüsü: the tasting menu

Questions & Answers about Şefimiz masayı süsleyip tadım menüsünü açıkladı.

What does the suffix -imiz in şefimiz indicate, and how is it used?

The suffix -imiz is the first-person-plural possessive ending. It attaches to şef (chef) to form şefimiz, meaning our chef. In Turkish, you express possession by adding possessive endings directly to the noun:

• şef + -imiz → şefimiz (“our chef”)

Why does masayı end with -yı, and what does it signify?

Masayı is masa (“table”) + -yı. This -yı is the accusative case marker (object case) used when the direct object is definite or specific.
Because masa ends in a vowel, a buffer consonant -y- is inserted before the accusative -ı:

• masa + y + ı → masayı (“the table,” as the definite object of the verb)

What is the function of the -ip suffix in süsleyip, and how does it work?

The -ip suffix is a converb (also called a verbal adverb) that links two actions carried out by the same subject. It indicates “after doing X, do Y.”
Here, süslemek (“to decorate”) in the past tense would be süsledi; replacing -di with -yip gives süsleyip, meaning “having decorated” or “decorated and then…”.

Why isn’t there a conjunction like ve (“and”) between süsleyip and açıkladı?

In Turkish, the -ip converb replaces the need for a separate conjunction. It smoothly links the first action (decorated) to the second (explained) without saying ve. So süsleyip açıkladı = “decorated and then explained.”

How is tadım menüsünü constructed? What do the suffixes -sü and -nü mean?

tadım menüsünü breaks down as follows:

1. menü = “menu”
2. -sü = third-person-singular possessive (“its menu”)
3. -nü = accusative case for a definite object, with vowel harmony on ü
   And tadım (“tasting”) modifies menü, so you get tadım menüsü (“its tasting menu”), then apply the accusative -nü:
   
   • tadım + menü + sü + nü → tadım menüsünü (“the tasting menu,” as a definite object)

Why is there no subject pronoun like o (“he/she/it”) before açıkladı?

In Turkish, the verb ending itself carries the subject information. -dı at the end of açıkladı is third-person-singular past tense, so you already know “he/she/it explained.” Adding o would be redundant, so it’s omitted.

Can you explain how vowel harmony affects the suffixes in this sentence?

Vowel harmony means suffix vowels must match the last vowel of the stem in frontness or backness (and rounding). Examples here:

• -imiz in şefimiz: i matches the front unrounded vowel e in şef.
• -yı in masayı: ı matches the back unrounded vowel a in masa.
• -sü in menüsü: ü matches the front rounded vowel ü in menü.
• -nü in menüsünü: ü again to harmonize with ü in the stem.
• -dı in açıkladı: ı matches the back unrounded vowel a in açıkla.
  Every suffix vowel adjusts to agree with the preceding vowel’s characteristics.