ELONIO
Log inSign up

Si no queda apio, podemos hacer la crema solo con puerro y patata.

Si no queda apio, podemos hacer la crema solo con puerro y patata.
If there is no celery left, we can make the soup just with leek and potato.
FromLesson 65inHardcore Spanish (Spain)

Questions & Answers about Si no queda apio, podemos hacer la crema solo con puerro y patata.

What does queda mean here?

Here queda comes from quedar, and it means to be left / to remain.

So Si no queda apio means If there’s no celery left.

This use of quedar is very common for talking about what remains of food, money, time, etc.:

  • No queda pan. = There’s no bread left.
  • ¿Queda leche? = Is there any milk left?
  • Me quedan diez euros. = I have ten euros left.

It is not the same as the English stay here, even though quedar can mean other things in other contexts.

Why is it si no and not sino?

Because si no and sino are different words with different jobs.

  • si no = if not / if there isn’t
  • sino = but rather / except

In your sentence, the meaning is conditional:

  • Si no queda apio... = If there’s no celery left...

So it must be si no as two words.

Compare:

  • Si no vienes, empezamos sin ti. = If you don’t come, we’ll start without you.
  • No es apio, sino puerro. = It isn’t celery, but rather leek.
Why is apio singular?

Because apio is being used as an uncountable food noun, like celery in English.

In English, you usually say:

  • There’s no celery left

not

Spanish works similarly here:

  • No queda apio

not usually

  • No quedan apios

You can use the plural apios in special contexts, for example when talking about different celery plants or separate units in a very literal way, but for cooking and ingredients, the singular mass-noun use is the normal one.

Why do we say la crema and not una crema?

Because la crema here refers to a specific dish that the speakers already have in mind.

It is like saying:

  • the soup
  • the cream soup
  • the purée

So podemos hacer la crema means we can make the soup / the cream soup—the one we were planning to make.

If you said una crema, it would sound more like a cream soup, not necessarily a specific one already under discussion.

In cooking Spanish, crema often means a blended vegetable soup or purée-like soup.

Why is it solo con puerro y patata without articles?

In Spanish, when listing ingredients after con, articles are often omitted, especially in recipe-style language.

So:

  • con puerro y patata
  • con cebolla y ajo
  • con tomate y pimiento

sounds natural.

If you added articles:

  • con el puerro y la patata

that would usually sound more specific, as if you were referring to particular leek and potato already identified in the situation.

Without articles, it has a more general ingredient feel: using leek and potato.

Why are puerro and patata singular too?

For the same reason: they are being named as ingredients in a general sense, not counted as individual items.

So:

  • con puerro y patata = with leek and potato

This is very common in Spanish recipes and food talk. English often does something similar:

  • made with chicken and rice
  • with onion and garlic

Even if in real life you use several pieces, the singular can still be used to name the ingredient category.

Why does the sentence use the present tense: queda and podemos?

Because Spanish often uses the present tense to talk about a current situation and an immediate practical possibility.

  • Si no queda apio = If there isn’t any celery left now
  • podemos hacer... = we can make...

This sounds natural and direct.

English can do the same:

  • If there’s no celery left, we can make the soup with just leek and potato.

There is no need for a future tense here. The present describes the condition, and podemos expresses what is possible as a result.

Why isn’t nosotros included before podemos?

Because Spanish usually drops subject pronouns when the verb form already makes the subject clear.

  • podemos already means we can

So nosotros podemos is grammatically possible, but unnecessary unless you want emphasis or contrast.

For example:

  • Podemos hacer la crema... = neutral, natural
  • Nosotros podemos hacer la crema... = more emphatic, like we can make it

Spanish is a pro-drop language, so this omission is very normal.

What exactly does solo mean here?

Here solo means only / just.

So:

  • solo con puerro y patata = just with leek and potato

It tells you that the soup can be made using only those ingredients, without celery.

You could also say solamente:

  • podemos hacer la crema solamente con puerro y patata

But solo is more natural in everyday speech.

Also, modern spelling usually writes solo without an accent, even when it means only.

Could we say Si no hay apio instead of Si no queda apio?

Yes, and it would be understandable, but the nuance is slightly different.

  • No hay apio = There is no celery
  • No queda apio = There is no celery left

No queda apio suggests there was some before, but now it has run out. That makes it especially natural in a kitchen or shopping context.

So in this sentence, queda is a very good choice because it matches the idea of checking what ingredients remain.

Why is it hacer la crema and not preparar la crema or cocinar la crema?

All of those can work, but hacer is the most everyday and general verb.

  • hacer la crema = make the soup
  • preparar la crema = prepare the soup
  • cocinar la crema = cook the soup

In ordinary conversation, Spanish often uses hacer where English might use make or prepare. It is simple and idiomatic.

So podemos hacer la crema sounds very natural.

Does patata tell us anything about Spain Spanish?

Yes, a little.

In Spain, patata is the normal everyday word for potato.

In many parts of Latin America, papa is more common.

So a Latin American version might often sound like:

  • Si no queda apio, podemos hacer la crema solo con puerro y papa.

Both are correct Spanish, but patata strongly fits Spain Spanish.

Is crema the same as cream in English?

Not necessarily.

In cooking Spanish, crema can mean several things depending on context. In this sentence, it most likely means a cream soup or puréed vegetable soup, not dairy cream by itself.

So la crema here is probably something like:

  • leek, potato, celery soup
  • a blended vegetable cream soup

This is why translating word-for-word as the cream would be misleading in English. The Spanish word has a broader culinary use.

Could the word order be changed?

Yes, a little, but the original is very natural.

For example, you could also say:

  • Si no queda apio, la crema la podemos hacer solo con puerro y patata.
  • Si no queda apio, podemos hacer solo con puerro y patata la crema.

But these alternatives sound more marked or less natural in everyday speech.

The original order:

  • Si no queda apio, podemos hacer la crema solo con puerro y patata.

is the most neutral and fluent way to say it.

AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Spanish grammar?”
Spanish grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Spanish

Master Spanish — from Si no queda apio, podemos hacer la crema solo con puerro y patata to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Spanish→