La evidencia confirma el hecho.

Breakdown of La evidencia confirma el hecho.

confirmar
to confirm
el hecho
the fact
la evidencia
the evidence

Questions & Answers about La evidencia confirma el hecho.

Why does the sentence use la with evidencia and el with hecho?

Because evidencia is a feminine singular noun, so it takes la.
Hecho is a masculine singular noun, so it takes el.

  • la evidencia
  • el hecho

This is a basic gender agreement pattern in Spanish: the article must match the noun in gender and number.

What part of speech is confirma, and why does it have that form?

Confirma is the third-person singular present indicative form of the verb confirmar.

The subject is la evidencia, which is singular, so the verb must also be singular:

  • yo confirmo
  • tú confirmas
  • él / ella / usted confirma

So La evidencia confirma... means that the evidence confirms...

Why is there no a before el hecho?

Because el hecho is a direct object, and it is not a person.

In Spanish, the personal a is normally used before specific human direct objects:

  • Veo a María.
  • Conozco a tu hermano.

But here, el hecho is a thing, not a person, so there is no a:

  • La evidencia confirma el hecho.
Does evidencia mean exactly the same as English evidence?

Often yes, but you should be a little careful.

In many contexts, evidencia does mean evidence, especially in formal or academic language. However, in everyday Spanish, especially in some contexts, prueba or pruebas can sound more natural when talking about proof or supporting material.

So:

  • evidencia = evidence
  • prueba / pruebas = proof, evidence, supporting proof

Depending on context, a Spaniard might also say:

That said, La evidencia confirma el hecho is perfectly grammatical and understandable.

What exactly does hecho mean here?

Here, hecho is a noun meaning fact.

So el hecho = the fact.

This word can be confusing because hecho is also the past participle of hacer:

  • He hecho la cena. = I have made dinner.

But in your sentence, it is not part of a verb form. It is simply a noun:

  • el hecho = the fact
Is this the same hecho that comes from the verb hacer?

Yes. Historically and grammatically, hecho is the past participle of hacer, and it is also used as a noun.

So Spanish has:

  • hacer = to do / to make
  • hecho = done / made
  • el hecho = the fact

This is very common in Spanish: a participle can become a noun over time.

Why is the word order La evidencia confirma el hecho?

This is the most neutral and standard Spanish word order:

subject + verb + direct object

  • La evidencia = subject
  • confirma = verb
  • el hecho = direct object

Spanish word order is more flexible than English, but this version sounds straightforward and natural.

Could the word order be changed?

Yes, but changing it usually changes the focus or emphasis.

For example:

  • La evidencia confirma el hecho.
    Neutral statement.

  • El hecho lo confirma la evidencia.
    More emphasis on the fact.

  • La evidencia lo confirma.
    Lo replaces el hecho.

Spanish often moves things around for emphasis, but the original sentence is the clearest basic form for learners.

Why are both nouns preceded by the definite article?

Spanish often uses definite articles more freely than English does.

Here, la evidencia and el hecho both refer to something identifiable in context:

  • la evidencia = the evidence
  • el hecho = the fact

If you remove the articles, the sentence becomes less natural or changes meaning. In this sentence, the articles help make it sound complete and specific.

Can evidencia be plural here?

Yes, if you are talking about several pieces of evidence:

But in actual Spanish, especially natural usage, many speakers would prefer:

  • Las pruebas confirman el hecho.

So the singular in your sentence treats evidence more like a collective or abstract idea.

Is this sentence natural in Spain, or does it sound too formal?

It is natural and correct, but it sounds a bit formal or academic.

You might see or hear it in:

  • reports
  • essays
  • journalism
  • legal or scientific contexts

In everyday conversation, people might choose something slightly more common, such as:

  • Las pruebas lo confirman.
  • La evidencia lo demuestra.

So the sentence is good Spanish, just not especially casual.

What is the difference between confirmar and demostrar in this kind of sentence?

They are similar, but not identical.

  • confirmar = to confirm
    It supports or verifies something that is already proposed or known.

  • demostrar = to prove / demonstrate
    It more strongly shows that something is true.

So:

  • La evidencia confirma el hecho
    The evidence confirms the fact.

  • La evidencia demuestra el hecho
    The evidence proves the fact.

In some contexts, demuestra sounds stronger than confirma.

How is evidencia pronounced in Spain?

In standard Spain Spanish, it is pronounced roughly like:

eh-bee-DEN-thya

A few useful points:

  • The stress is on den: eviDENcia
  • In most of Spain, c before i is pronounced like th in think
  • So -cia sounds like thya

Likewise:

  • confirma → kon-FEER-ma
  • hecho → EH-cho

In hecho, the h is silent, and ch sounds like English ch in chair.

AI Language TutorTry it ↗
Your avatar
“What's the best way to learn Spanish grammar?”
Spanish grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Spanish

Master Spanish — from La evidencia confirma el hecho to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions