Breakdown of La evidencia confirma el hecho.
Questions & Answers about La evidencia confirma el hecho.
Why does the sentence use la with evidencia and el with hecho?
What part of speech is confirma, and why does it have that form?
Why is there no a before el hecho?
Because el hecho is a direct object, and it is not a person.
In Spanish, the personal a is normally used before specific human direct objects:
- Veo a María.
- Conozco a tu hermano.
But here, el hecho is a thing, not a person, so there is no a:
- La evidencia confirma el hecho.
Does evidencia mean exactly the same as English evidence?
Often yes, but you should be a little careful.
In many contexts, evidencia does mean evidence, especially in formal or academic language. However, in everyday Spanish, especially in some contexts, prueba or pruebas can sound more natural when talking about proof or supporting material.
So:
- evidencia = evidence
- prueba / pruebas = proof, evidence, supporting proof
Depending on context, a Spaniard might also say:
That said, La evidencia confirma el hecho is perfectly grammatical and understandable.
What exactly does hecho mean here?
Is this the same hecho that comes from the verb hacer?
Yes. Historically and grammatically, hecho is the past participle of hacer, and it is also used as a noun.
So Spanish has:
- hacer = to do / to make
- hecho = done / made
- el hecho = the fact
This is very common in Spanish: a participle can become a noun over time.
Why is the word order La evidencia confirma el hecho?
This is the most neutral and standard Spanish word order:
subject + verb + direct object
Spanish word order is more flexible than English, but this version sounds straightforward and natural.
Could the word order be changed?
Why are both nouns preceded by the definite article?
Spanish often uses definite articles more freely than English does.
Here, la evidencia and el hecho both refer to something identifiable in context:
- la evidencia = the evidence
- el hecho = the fact
If you remove the articles, the sentence becomes less natural or changes meaning. In this sentence, the articles help make it sound complete and specific.
Can evidencia be plural here?
Is this sentence natural in Spain, or does it sound too formal?
It is natural and correct, but it sounds a bit formal or academic.
You might see or hear it in:
- reports
- essays
- journalism
- legal or scientific contexts
In everyday conversation, people might choose something slightly more common, such as:
- Las pruebas lo confirman.
- La evidencia lo demuestra.
So the sentence is good Spanish, just not especially casual.
What is the difference between confirmar and demostrar in this kind of sentence?
They are similar, but not identical.
confirmar = to confirm
It supports or verifies something that is already proposed or known.demostrar = to prove / demonstrate
It more strongly shows that something is true.
So:
La evidencia confirma el hecho
The evidence confirms the fact.La evidencia demuestra el hecho
The evidence proves the fact.
In some contexts, demuestra sounds stronger than confirma.
How is evidencia pronounced in Spain?
In standard Spain Spanish, it is pronounced roughly like:
eh-bee-DEN-thya
A few useful points:
- The stress is on den: eviDENcia
- In most of Spain, c before i is pronounced like th in think
- So -cia sounds like thya
Likewise:
- confirma → kon-FEER-ma
- hecho → EH-cho
In hecho, the h is silent, and ch sounds like English ch in chair.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning SpanishMaster Spanish — from La evidencia confirma el hecho to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions