Because cambiar is normally a direct transitive verb here. It takes a direct object without a preposition.
So:
Examples:
You would not usually say cambia a el campo de visión in this context.
Spanish often uses noun + de + noun where English might use a compound noun or adjective.
So:
This structure is very common:
You may also see campo visual, but campo de visión is a very natural and common way to express the idea.
It has an accent because of Spanish stress rules.
Visión is stressed on the last syllable: vi-SIÓN.
Words ending in n, s, or a vowel are normally stressed on the second-to-last syllable unless there is a written accent. The accent mark shows that the stress is irregular here.
So:
Spanish often repeats the article with coordinated nouns, especially when they are understood as two separate concepts.
So:
sounds natural because it treats them as two distinct things:
In some contexts, Spanish can omit the second article, but here repeating el is the most natural and clear option.
Yes, that would also be grammatical.
There can be a slight nuance:
In many practical contexts, especially optics, they may overlap a lot. But campo de visión is very straightforward and common when talking about what an eyepiece changes.
Yes, and that can confuse learners.
Here, cambia means changes/alters.
But cambiar can also mean to switch or to replace, depending on context:
So the exact meaning depends on what follows and the situation.
Yes. This is a very normal Spanish word order:
Spanish is flexible with word order, but this neutral order is the most common and easiest to understand.
Often, yes, especially in technical or descriptive language. But depending on context, a speaker might also say:
In standard Spanish, especially in technical writing, el ocular is the normal choice.