Questions & Answers about Lo llamaban el diablo.
What does lo mean here?
Lo is the direct object pronoun, and here it means him.
It stands for the person being called el diablo.
- Llamaban a Juan el diablo.
- Lo llamaban el diablo.
So lo replaces a Juan.
Why is it lo and not le?
In standard Spanish, lo is the normal pronoun for a masculine singular direct object.
In this sentence, the person being called something is the direct object of llamar, so lo is the expected form.
However, in much of Spain, you may also hear:
- Le llamaban el diablo.
That is because of leísmo, which is common in Spain for masculine human direct objects. So:
- Lo llamaban el diablo = fully standard everywhere
- Le llamaban el diablo = common in Spain if the person is male
What form is llamaban?
Llamaban is the imperfect indicative, 3rd person plural, of llamar.
So it comes from:
- llamar = to call
And llamaban means:
- they were calling
- they used to call
- people called
depending on context.
Why is llamaban in the imperfect?
The imperfect is often used for:
- repeated actions in the past
- habitual actions
- background description
- ongoing situations
So Lo llamaban el diablo suggests that this was what people used to call him or that it was a label applied to him over a period of time.
Compare:
- Lo llamaban el diablo = people used to call him that / that was his usual nickname
- Lo llamaron el diablo = they called him that on a specific occasion, or they gave him that name at a definite moment
Who does -ban refer to? Who are they?
Why isn’t it se llamaba el diablo?
Because se llamaba and lo llamaban are not quite the same.
- Se llamaba... usually means his name was... / he was called...
- Lo llamaban... means people called him...
So:
- Se llamaba Juan = his name was Juan
- Lo llamaban el diablo = people called him the devil
In other words, se llamaba focuses more on the name itself, while lo llamaban focuses on what others called him.
How does llamar work in this kind of sentence?
Why is it el diablo and not just diablo?
Because Spanish often uses the article with a common noun used as a label or nickname-like description:
- el diablo
- la reina
- el loco
So Lo llamaban el diablo means they called him the devil.
If you said Lo llamaban Diablo, that would sound more like Diablo was being used as a more fixed proper nickname, like a name.
Why isn’t there an a before el diablo?
Because el diablo is not the direct object here.
The direct object is already lo.
The phrase el diablo is the name/label being applied to that person.
That is why:
- Lo llamaban el diablo = They called him the devil
But:
- Llamaban al diablo = They called/summoned the devil
Those are two different structures with two different meanings.
Why is diablo lowercase? Could it still be a nickname?
Yes. Lowercase is normal here because diablo is a common noun.
So:
- el diablo = the devil
In many contexts, this is a figurative nickname or description, not necessarily the literal Devil.
If it were being treated as a formal alias or stylized nickname, you might sometimes see Diablo or el Diablo, but el diablo in lowercase is the normal default.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning SpanishMaster Spanish — from Lo llamaban el diablo to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions