Questions & Answers about Stanar je potpisao ugovor.
Why is je used in Stanar je potpisao ugovor?
Je is the 3rd person singular present form of biti (to be), and here it helps form the past tense.
So the structure is:
- stanar = the tenant
- je = has/is
- potpisao = signed
In Serbian, the common past tense is made with:
- a present-tense form of biti
- plus the past participle
So je potpisao means signed / has signed, depending on context.
Why is it potpisao, not just potpisati?
Potpisati is the dictionary form (the infinitive), meaning to sign.
In the sentence, you need the past participle, because the action happened in the past. For a masculine singular subject, that participle is:
- potpisao
So:
- potpisati = to sign
- potpisao = signed (masculine singular)
If the subject changed, the form would change too:
- Stanarka je potpisala ugovor. = The female tenant signed the contract.
- Stanari su potpisali ugovor. = The tenants signed the contract.
What case is stanar in?
Stanar is in the nominative case, because it is the subject of the sentence — the person doing the action.
Here:
- stanar = subject
- je potpisao = verb phrase
- ugovor = object
So stanar answers the question Who signed?
Answer: Stanar.
Why is ugovor not changed? Shouldn't the object be in the accusative?
Yes — ugovor is in the accusative, but for many masculine inanimate nouns, the accusative singular looks exactly like the nominative singular.
So:
- nominative: ugovor = contract
- accusative: ugovor = contract
That is normal.
Compare this with a masculine animate noun, where accusative usually changes:
- stanar (nom.) = tenant
- stanara (acc.) = tenant
But with ugovor, because it is inanimate, nominative and accusative are the same in the singular.
How do I know ugovor is the object if it looks the same as the nominative?
You know from sentence structure and meaning.
In Stanar je potpisao ugovor:
- stanar is the one performing the action
- ugovor is the thing being signed
So even though ugovor looks like a nominative form, its role in the sentence is accusative/direct object.
This is very common in Serbian, especially with masculine inanimate nouns.
Why is there no word for the or a?
Serbian has no articles like English a/an/the.
So stanar can mean:
- a tenant
- the tenant
And ugovor can mean:
- a contract
- the contract
The exact meaning depends on context, not on a separate article.
That is one of the big differences from English.
Can the word order change?
Yes. Serbian word order is more flexible than English word order, because cases help show what each word is doing.
The neutral order here is:
- Stanar je potpisao ugovor.
But other orders are possible, depending on emphasis:
- Ugovor je potpisao stanar. = It was the tenant who signed the contract.
- Potpisao je stanar ugovor. = possible, but more marked/stylistic
However, in normal learning situations, Stanar je potpisao ugovor is the safest and most neutral version.
Also note that the short form je usually stays in the second position of the clause, which is a very important Serbian pattern.
What does it mean that je is in the second position?
In Serbian, short unstressed words called clitics often come in the second position of the sentence or clause. Je is one of them.
So in:
- Stanar je potpisao ugovor
the first unit is Stanar, and then je comes right after it.
If another element came first, je would usually follow that element:
- Danas je stanar potpisao ugovor.
- U ponedeljak je stanar potpisao ugovor.
This is why you often see je very early in the sentence.
Is potpisao perfective? Does aspect matter here?
Yes. Potpisao comes from potpisati, which is a perfective verb.
That means it presents the action as completed: the signing was done.
This fits naturally with a sentence like:
- Stanar je potpisao ugovor. = The tenant signed the contract.
The imperfective partner is usually potpisivati:
- Stanar je potpisivao ugovor.
That would suggest something like:
- he was signing it
- he used to sign it
- he was in the process of signing it
So aspect matters a lot:
- potpisao = completed act
- potpisivao = ongoing/repeated/process-like act
What tense is this exactly?
This is the past tense commonly called perfekat in Serbian.
It is formed with:
- present tense of biti
- past participle
Here that gives:
- je
- potpisao
In everyday Serbian, this is the normal way to say that someone did something in the past.
How would the sentence change if the subject were female or plural?
The participle agrees with the subject in gender and number.
So:
- Stanar je potpisao ugovor. = male tenant
- Stanarka je potpisala ugovor. = female tenant
- Stanari su potpisali ugovor. = male/mixed group of tenants
- Stanarke su potpisale ugovor. = female tenants
Notice both parts change:
- je → su for plural
- potpisao → potpisala / potpisali / potpisale
Is stanar always masculine because of the ending, or can it refer to any tenant?
Stanar is a masculine noun, and it normally refers to a male tenant.
For a female tenant, Serbian usually uses:
- stanarka
So the sentence specifically suggests a male tenant unless context says otherwise.
This is different from English, where tenant is not grammatically gendered.
How is this sentence pronounced?
A simple pronunciation guide is:
- Stanar je potpisao ugovor
- roughly: STAH-nar yeh poht-PEE-sah-oh OO-goh-vor
A few useful points:
- j is pronounced like English y in yes
- je sounds roughly like yeh
- r in Serbian is rolled or tapped
- stress is not usually marked in normal writing, so learners usually pick it up by listening
The most important pronunciation point in this sentence for English speakers is usually:
- je = yeh, not like English jee
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning SerbianMaster Serbian — from Stanar je potpisao ugovor to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions