Breakdown of Osiguravač će pokriti štetu od nevremena.
Questions & Answers about Osiguravač će pokriti štetu od nevremena.
What does osiguravač mean exactly?
Osiguravač means insurer. In this sentence, it is the party that provides the insurance and pays for covered damage.
A few useful related words:
- osiguranje = insurance
- osiguranik = the insured person / policyholder
- osiguravajuća kuća or osiguravajuće društvo = insurance company
So osiguravač is specifically the insurer, not insurance in general.
Why is će used here?
Će marks the future tense.
Serbian future tense is commonly formed with:
- a form of hteti = will
- plus the infinitive of the main verb
Here:
- će = will for he/she/it or any singular third-person subject
- pokriti = to cover
So će pokriti = will cover.
It is će because osiguravač is grammatically third person singular.
Why does će come after osiguravač instead of before it?
Because će is a clitic in Serbian, and clitics usually go in second position in the sentence or clause.
So:
- Osiguravač će pokriti... = natural, neutral order
You usually do not start the sentence with će in this kind of structure.
If another element came first, će would normally follow that first element:
- Štetu od nevremena će pokriti osiguravač.
So the position of će is about Serbian sentence rhythm and clitic placement, not just literal word-for-word translation.
What form is pokriti, and why is that form used?
Pokriti is the infinitive of the verb.
It is also a perfective verb, which is very common when talking about a single completed future action:
- će pokriti = will cover
In this context, that makes sense because the idea is that the insurer will cover a specific loss or damage.
Useful contrast:
- pokrivati = imperfective, more like be covering / cover habitually
- pokriti = perfective, cover once / fully cover
In insurance language, pokriti štetu is a very common expression meaning to cover damage / compensate for damage.
Why is it štetu and not šteta?
Because štetu is in the accusative case, which is used for the direct object.
The verb pokriti takes a direct object: what will the insurer cover?
Answer: štetu = the damage
Base form:
- šteta = damage, loss
Accusative singular:
- štetu
This is a regular pattern for many feminine nouns ending in -a:
- nominative: žena
- accusative: ženu
So:
- šteta → štetu
Why is it od nevremena? What case is nevremena?
Nevremena is in the genitive case because it follows the preposition od.
So:
- od
- genitive
Base form:
- nevreme = bad weather, storm, severe weather
After od:
- od nevremena
In this sentence, šteta od nevremena means damage from severe weather or weather-related damage.
This is a very natural Serbian way to express cause or source of damage.
What exactly does nevreme mean?
Nevreme means bad weather, severe weather, or sometimes stormy weather, depending on context.
It does not just mean ordinary unpleasant weather. It often suggests something stronger, like:
- storm
- hail
- strong wind
- heavy rain
- weather event causing damage
That is why it fits well in an insurance sentence.
Could Serbian also use another preposition instead of od here?
Yes, but od is very natural here.
Some alternatives are:
- šteta od nevremena = damage from severe weather
- šteta usled nevremena = damage due to severe weather, more formal
- šteta zbog nevremena = damage because of severe weather, possible but a bit broader and less fixed-sounding in insurance language
So in this sentence, od is probably the most idiomatic choice.
Why are there no words for the in the Serbian sentence?
Because Serbian does not have articles like the or a/an.
So Serbian simply says:
- osiguravač
- štetu
- nevremena
Whether English translates them as the insurer, the damage, or just damage depends on context.
Serbian relies on:
- context
- word order
- case endings
- the overall situation
to express things that English often marks with articles.
Can the word order change?
Yes. Serbian word order is fairly flexible because the case endings show what each noun is doing.
This sentence has a neutral order:
- Osiguravač će pokriti štetu od nevremena.
But you could also say:
- Štetu od nevremena će pokriti osiguravač.
- Štetu će pokriti osiguravač od nevremena.
This is much less natural, because od nevremena belongs closely with štetu.
So while word order can change, some parts still strongly prefer to stay together:
- štetu od nevremena works as a unit
Is osiguravač the same as osiguranje?
No.
- osiguravač = insurer
- osiguranje = insurance
Examples:
- zdravstveno osiguranje = health insurance
- životno osiguranje = life insurance
In everyday speech, people sometimes use osiguranje loosely when talking about the insurance company, but strictly speaking, osiguravač is the better word for the insurer.
Is šteta singular or plural here?
It is singular.
Forms:
- šteta = damage, loss
- štetu = accusative singular
- štete = nominative plural or genitive singular, depending on context
In this sentence, the insurer is covering a specific damage/loss or damage as a category, expressed in the singular:
- pokriti štetu
This is very natural in Serbian, even when English might sometimes prefer damages or just damage.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning SerbianMaster Serbian — from Osiguravač će pokriti štetu od nevremena to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions