Zarząd zatwierdzi protokół, a zarządca rozliczy fundusz remontowy.

They are related, but they are not the same noun.

• zarząd = management board, board, or management
• zarządca = administrator, manager, or person in charge of managing something

So in this sentence:

• zarząd is a group or body of people
• zarządca is one specific person

This is a common thing in Polish: related words can look similar but refer to different roles.

Because these are perfective verbs.

In Polish, perfective verbs do not normally have a true present meaning. Their present-looking forms are usually used for the simple future.

So:

• zatwierdza = is approving / approves (imperfective, present)
• zatwierdzi = will approve (perfective, future)

And similarly:

• rozlicza = is settling / settles / accounts for (imperfective, present)
• rozliczy = will settle / will account for (perfective, future)

So even though the forms look like present tense forms to an English speaker, here they mean future.

Both verbs are perfective:

• zatwierdzić → zatwierdzi
• rozliczyć → rozliczy

Polish aspect tells you how an action is viewed:

• imperfective = ongoing, repeated, or simply viewed as a process
• perfective = completed, one whole action, often a single result

Here the idea is that each action will be completed:

• the board will approve the protocol/document
• the administrator will settle/account for the renovation fund

That is why perfective verbs are natural in this sentence.

A and i can both be translated as and, but they are not used in exactly the same way.

• i joins things more neutrally: X and Y
• a often links two separate actions, people, or facts, with a slight contrast or shift of focus: and / while / whereas / and then

In this sentence:

• Zarząd zatwierdzi protokół, a zarządca rozliczy fundusz remontowy.

A sounds natural because the sentence is presenting two different subjects doing two different tasks.

It is almost like saying:

• The board will approve the protocol, and the administrator will settle the renovation fund.

Using i would sound less natural here because the sentence is not just listing two equal items; it is contrasting two roles and their separate responsibilities.

They are the direct objects of the verbs, so they are in the accusative case.

However, for many masculine inanimate nouns in Polish, the accusative singular looks exactly the same as the nominative singular.

So:

• protokół

  • nominative: protokół
  • accusative: protokół

• fundusz

  • nominative: fundusz
  • accusative: fundusz

That is why they do not visibly change here.

Because the adjective must agree with the noun in:

• gender
• number
• case

Here:

• fundusz is masculine singular
• it is in the accusative
• but for masculine inanimate nouns, accusative singular has the same form as nominative singular

So the adjective also keeps the nominative/accusative masculine singular form:

• remontowy

That gives:

• fundusz remontowy

If the noun were in a different case, the adjective would change too. For example:

• nominative: fundusz remontowy
• genitive: funduszu remontowego

Because Polish does not have articles like English a or the.

So a noun like zarząd can mean:

• a board
• the board

and the exact meaning depends on context.

The same applies to:

• protokół
• zarządca
• fundusz remontowy

English requires articles, but Polish usually does not.

Yes, normally it is.

In Polish, when a connects two clauses, a comma is usually placed before it.

So this punctuation is standard:

• Zarząd zatwierdzi protokół, a zarządca rozliczy fundusz remontowy.

This is similar to how English often uses a comma before but, and sometimes before and when joining full clauses.

Yes, Polish word order is more flexible than English word order.

The neutral order here is:

• Zarząd zatwierdzi protokół, a zarządca rozliczy fundusz remontowy.

But other orders are possible, for example to emphasize a different part:

• Protokół zatwierdzi zarząd, a fundusz remontowy rozliczy zarządca.

This sounds more marked and emphasizes the objects.

Even though Polish word order is flexible, the original sentence is the most neutral and natural choice in ordinary formal language.

A rough pronunciation guide:

• Zarząd ≈ ZAH-zhont
• zatwierdzi ≈ za-TVYER-jee
• protokół ≈ pro-to-KOOW
• a ≈ ah
• zarządca ≈ za-ZHON-tsa
• rozliczy ≈ roz-LEE-chih
• fundusz ≈ FOON-doosh
• remontowy ≈ re-mon-TO-vih

A few useful sound notes:

• rz often sounds like the s in measure
• cz sounds like ch in chop
• sz sounds like sh
• ó sounds like u
• ą is a nasal vowel; in zarząd it is often heard approximately like on/om before the final consonant

That is a very normal Polish sentence pattern.

A common neutral order is:

• subject + verb + object

So:

• zarząd
  • zatwierdzi
    • protokół
• zarządca
  • rozliczy
    • fundusz remontowy

Polish does not rely on word order as strictly as English does, because case endings help show grammatical roles. Still, this order is very natural and easy to process.

Yes, it sounds fairly formal or administrative.

Words like:

• zarząd
• zatwierdzi
• protokół
• rozliczy
• fundusz remontowy

are typical of official, business, legal, or property-management contexts.

A native speaker would expect this kind of sentence in:

• meeting minutes
• company documents
• housing association documents
• administrative communication

So it is a useful example of formal Polish rather than casual conversation.