Matecznik jest na ramce pszczelarskiej.

Because na here means on, and with that meaning it requires the locative case.

• dictionary form: ramka = frame
• locative singular: ramce

So:

• ramka = a frame
• na ramce = on the frame

This is a very common Polish pattern:

• na stole = on the table
• na półce = on the shelf
• na ramce = on the frame

Because adjectives in Polish must agree with the noun they describe in:

• gender
• number
• case

Here, ramka is:

• feminine
• singular
• in the locative case after na

So the adjective pszczelarska changes to pszczelarskiej to match it:

• nominative: ramka pszczelarska
• locative: na ramce pszczelarskiej

This kind of matching happens all the time in Polish.

Matecznik is in the nominative case, because it is the subject of the sentence.

The sentence structure is basically:

• Matecznik = subject
• jest = is
• na ramce pszczelarskiej = on the beekeeping frame

So matecznik stays in its basic dictionary form.

In normal standard Polish, yes.

Polish usually keeps the present tense of być (to be) in ordinary sentences like this:

• Matecznik jest na ramce pszczelarskiej.

English speakers sometimes expect it to be droppable because some other Slavic languages omit is in the present tense, but Polish normally does not do that in standard speech.

You may see omission in:

• notes
• headlines
• very informal style

But for a learner, the safe and correct version is:

• Matecznik jest na ramce pszczelarskiej.

Yes. Polish word order is more flexible than English word order.

For example, these are all possible, depending on emphasis:

• Matecznik jest na ramce pszczelarskiej.
• Na ramce pszczelarskiej jest matecznik.

The first version sounds neutral: it starts with what you are talking about.

The second version puts more focus on where it is.

Even though word order can change, the case endings still show the grammatical roles.

Because na means on, while w means in.

So the difference is spatial:

• na ramce = on the frame
• w ramce = in the frame

In this sentence, the queen cell is located on the beekeeping frame, so na is the natural choice.

It means something like beekeeping, apicultural, or used in beekeeping.

It comes from pszczelarski, an adjective related to beekeeping or beekeepers.

So:

• ramka pszczelarska = a beekeeping frame / hive frame

This is more specific than just saying a general frame.

No. Polish has no articles.

So Polish does not directly distinguish between:

• a queen cell
• the queen cell

That difference is understood from context.

So Matecznik jest na ramce pszczelarskiej could mean either:

• A queen cell is on the beekeeping frame
• The queen cell is on the beekeeping frame

depending on the situation.

One strong clue is the ending -a in the dictionary form:

• ramka

Many Polish nouns ending in -a are feminine.

You can also see it in adjective agreement:

• ramka pszczelarska
  not
• ramka pszczelarski

And in the locative:

• na ramce pszczelarskiej

So the adjective ending helps confirm the noun’s gender.

A rough English-friendly approximation is:

mah-TEHCH-neek yest nah RAHMT-seh pshtcheh-LAR-skey

A few useful sound notes:

• cz sounds like ch in chop
• rz often sounds like zh as in measure
• szcz is a difficult cluster, roughly pshch
• stress in Polish usually falls on the second-to-last syllable

So:

• ma-TECZ-nik
• pszcze-LAR-skiej

Yes, this is a normal pattern for many feminine nouns ending in -ka.

A common locative singular change is:

• -ka → -ce

For example:

• półka → na półce
• szafka → w szafce
• ramka → na ramce

So once you learn this pattern, forms like ramce become much easier to recognize.

Sometimes, depending on context, yes.

Polish:

• Matecznik jest na ramce pszczelarskiej.

can be understood as either:

• The queen cell is on the beekeeping frame.
• There is a queen cell on the beekeeping frame.

Polish does not always separate these two ideas as sharply as English does. The context decides whether the sentence is simply describing location or introducing something new.