Koordinatene står i cachebeskrivelsen.

Questions & Answers about Koordinatene står i cachebeskrivelsen.

Why is står used here instead of er?

In Norwegian, stå is often used when information is written, printed, or listed somewhere.

So Koordinatene står i cachebeskrivelsen is very natural Norwegian, even though a word-for-word English version would sound odd: The coordinates stand in the cache description.

A more idiomatic English equivalent would be:

  • The coordinates are in the cache description
  • The coordinates are listed in the cache description
  • The coordinates appear in the cache description

So here, står does not mean physical standing. It refers to something being written somewhere.

What form is koordinatene?

Koordinatene is the definite plural form of koordinat.

The pattern is:

  • en koordinat = a coordinate
  • koordinater = coordinates
  • koordinatene = the coordinates

So the ending -ene marks definite plural.

This is very common in Norwegian:

  • bil → bilen = the car
  • biler → bilene = the cars
  • koordinater → koordinatene = the coordinates
Why is it cachebeskrivelsen and not two separate words?

Norwegian very often makes compound nouns by writing them as one word.

So:

  • cache
    • beskrivelse = cachebeskrivelse
  • cachebeskrivelsen = the cache description

This is different from English, where we often write similar expressions as separate words:

  • cache description

In Norwegian, writing it as one word is the normal pattern.

Also notice that the definite ending is added to the whole compound:

  • en beskrivelse = a description
  • beskrivelsen = the description
  • cachebeskrivelsen = the cache description
Why is the sentence using i?

I usually means in.

Here it is used because the coordinates are in the description, meaning inside the text/content of it.

That is a natural choice in Norwegian when talking about written information:

  • Det står i boka. = It says so in the book.
  • Det står i e-posten. = It says so in the email.
  • Det står i beskrivelsen. = It says so in the description.

So i fits the idea of something being contained within a text.

Why do both nouns have definite forms?

Because the sentence is talking about specific coordinates and a specific cache description.

  • koordinatene = the coordinates
  • cachebeskrivelsen = the cache description

In Norwegian, definiteness is usually shown by adding an ending to the noun:

  • -en / -a / -et / -ene

So instead of separate words like English the, Norwegian often marks definiteness on the noun itself.

This sentence sounds like both things are already known from context:

  • which coordinates
  • which cache description
Does står change because koordinatene is plural?

No. In Norwegian, verbs usually do not change depending on person or number.

So står stays the same whether the subject is singular or plural:

  • Koordinaten står i beskrivelsen. = The coordinate is in the description.
  • Koordinatene står i beskrivelsen. = The coordinates are in the description.

This is much simpler than English, where is/are changes.

Could the word order be changed?

Yes. A very common alternative is:

I cachebeskrivelsen står koordinatene.

This still means the same thing, but it puts more focus on where the coordinates are.

This happens because Norwegian follows the V2 rule in main clauses: the verb usually comes in the second position.

So:

  • Koordinatene står i cachebeskrivelsen.
  • I cachebeskrivelsen står koordinatene.

Both are correct, but the emphasis is slightly different.

Is cache a normal Norwegian word?

It is a borrowed word, especially common in geocaching contexts.

In everyday Norwegian outside that hobby, cache is not an old traditional Norwegian word, but people still use it naturally in this kind of context. Norwegian often keeps borrowed words, especially in technical or hobby vocabulary.

In compounds, borrowed words can still combine with Norwegian words:

  • cachebeskrivelse
  • cacheeier
  • cachetur

So even though cache is borrowed, the structure of the sentence is fully Norwegian.

Is there a more literal way to understand the grammar of the whole sentence?

Yes. Grammatically, you can break it down like this:

  • Koordinatene = the coordinates
  • står = stand / are written / are listed
  • i = in
  • cachebeskrivelsen = the cache description

So the literal structure is:

The coordinates stand in the cache description.

That literal version helps explain the grammar, but it is not the best English translation. In natural English, you would normally say:

  • The coordinates are in the cache description
  • The coordinates are listed in the cache description
How would I say the same thing in a slightly different natural way?

A few natural alternatives are:

  • Koordinatene finnes i cachebeskrivelsen.
    = The coordinates can be found in the cache description.

  • Koordinatene er oppgitt i cachebeskrivelsen.
    = The coordinates are given in the cache description.

  • Du finner koordinatene i cachebeskrivelsen.
    = You’ll find the coordinates in the cache description.

But Koordinatene står i cachebeskrivelsen is very normal and idiomatic Norwegian.

AI Language TutorTry it ↗
Your avatar
“What's the best way to learn Norwegian grammar?”
Norwegian grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Norwegian

Master Norwegian — from Koordinatene står i cachebeskrivelsen to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions