Breakdown of Amici sortiuntur, et sors primum lusorem eligit.
Questions & Answers about Amici sortiuntur, et sors primum lusorem eligit.
Why does sortiuntur look like a passive verb if the meaning is active?
Because sortior is a deponent verb.
In Latin, deponent verbs use passive forms but have an active meaning. So:
- sortior = I draw lots / I obtain by lot
- sortiuntur = they draw lots
Even though -untur is a passive-looking ending, here it does not mean they are drawn by lot. It means they draw lots.
This is a very common thing for Latin learners to notice and ask about.
What form is sortiuntur exactly?
Sortiuntur is:
- 3rd person plural
- present tense
- indicative mood
- from the deponent verb sortior, sortiri
So it means they draw lots or they are drawing lots, depending on context.
Why is amici in the nominative plural?
Because amici is the subject of sortiuntur.
- amici = friends
- nominative plural of amicus
Since the verb means they draw lots, we ask: who is drawing lots?
Answer: the friends.
So amici must be in the nominative, the case normally used for the subject.
Are sortiuntur and sors related?
Yes. They are closely related in meaning.
- sors = lot, chance, a lot used for drawing
- sortior = to draw lots, to obtain by lot
So the sentence uses both the verb and the noun from the same basic idea:
- Amici sortiuntur = the friends draw lots
- sors ... eligit = the lot chooses/selects
This is a neat bit of Latin word-family vocabulary.
What case is sors, and why?
Sors is nominative singular.
It is the subject of the second verb, eligit:
- sors = the lot
- eligit = chooses/selects
So in the second clause, the thing doing the action is sors, which is why it is nominative.
What case is primum lusorem, and why?
Primum lusorem is accusative singular because it is the direct object of eligit.
- eligit = chooses / selects
- Whom does the lot choose?
- primum lusorem = the first player
Both words are accusative singular:
- primum modifies lusorem
- lusorem is accusative singular of lusor
So the phrase means the first player.
Why is it primum lusorem and not just primo or primum by itself?
Because primum here is an adjective, not an adverb.
It agrees with lusorem in:
- case: accusative
- number: singular
- gender: masculine
So:
- primum lusorem = the first player
If it were an adverb, primum could mean at first or first in a different sense, but here it is clearly describing lusorem.
Why is lusorem singular when amici is plural?
Because the friends are all taking part in the lot-drawing, but the lot selects only one person as the first player.
So the sentence means:
- several friends draw lots
- the lot chooses one first player
That is why:
- amici = plural
- lusorem = singular
Why does Latin say the lot chooses? Can an object really choose?
This is a natural way of speaking in both Latin and English.
It is a kind of shorthand or personification:
- literally, the lot chooses
- in sense, the outcome of the lot determines who goes first
Latin often allows this kind of expression. It does not mean the lot is alive; it just means the decision is made by lot.
Why is the verb eligit singular?
Because its subject, sors, is singular.
In the second clause:
- sors = singular subject
- eligit = he/she/it chooses, 3rd person singular present
If the subject were plural, the verb would also be plural. But here there is only one sors.
What tense are the verbs in this sentence?
Both verbs are in the present tense:
- sortiuntur = they draw lots / are drawing lots
- eligit = chooses / is choosing
Latin present tense can often be translated in more than one way in English, depending on context:
- Friends draw lots, and the lot chooses the first player
- The friends are drawing lots, and the lot is choosing the first player
Both are possible as translations of the grammar.
Is the word order unusual?
Not really. It is perfectly normal Latin word order.
The sentence is:
- Amici sortiuntur
- et sors primum lusorem eligit
Latin word order is more flexible than English because endings show the grammatical roles. So Latin does not rely as heavily on position.
This sentence is fairly clear and straightforward:
- subject + verb
- et
- subject + object + verb
Also, Latin often likes to place the main verb toward the end of a clause, as in eligit.
What does et do here?
Et simply means and.
It joins the two clauses:
- Amici sortiuntur
- sors primum lusorem eligit
So the whole sentence gives a sequence:
- the friends draw lots
- the lot selects the first player
What is the dictionary form of lusorem?
The dictionary form is lusor.
More fully, you might see:
- lusor, lusoris = player
In the sentence, it appears as lusorem, which is the accusative singular form.
A learner often needs to get used to the fact that Latin dictionary entries usually give the nominative singular, while the sentence may use a different form.
Could sortiuntur mean they obtain by lot instead of they draw lots?
Yes, the verb sortior can have meanings like:
- draw lots
- decide by lot
- obtain by lot
Which English wording is best depends on context.
In this sentence, because the next clause mentions sors choosing the first player, the most natural understanding is that the friends are drawing lots to decide who goes first.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Amici sortiuntur, et sors primum lusorem eligit to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions