Breakdown of Infans, si mater abest, lacrimat; cum mater adest, demum tacet.
Questions & Answers about Infans, si mater abest, lacrimat; cum mater adest, demum tacet.
Why is the sentence arranged as Infans, si mater abest, lacrimat; cum mater adest, demum tacet instead of putting the main idea first and the condition after it?
Latin word order is much freer than English word order. The sentence begins with infans to set the topic: the baby / child. Then the two time/condition clauses are inserted around the two main actions:
- si mater abest = if the mother is away
- cum mater adest = when the mother is present
So the structure is roughly:
- The baby, if the mother is absent, cries;
- when the mother is present, only then is silent.
This is perfectly natural Latin. Latin often places an important noun first for emphasis or topic-setting.
What case is infans, and why?
Infans is nominative singular because it is the subject of both main verbs:
- lacrimat = cries
- tacet = is silent
So infans is the one doing both actions.
A useful way to see it is:
- Infans lacrimat = The baby cries
- Infans tacet = The baby is silent
Why is mater also in the nominative?
Because mater is the subject of abest and adest.
- mater abest = the mother is absent
- mater adest = the mother is present
So there are really three little clauses here:
- Infans lacrimat
- mater abest
- mater adest
- infans tacet
In each clause, the noun doing the action or being in the state is nominative.
What is the difference between si and cum here?
They introduce different kinds of subordinate clauses:
- si = if
- cum = when
So:
- si mater abest means if the mother is away/absent
- cum mater adest means when the mother is present
In this sentence, si gives a condition, while cum gives a time circumstance.
Is cum here the preposition meaning with?
No. Here cum is a conjunction, not a preposition.
Compare:
cum matre = with the mother
Here cum is a preposition and takes the ablative (matre).cum mater adest = when the mother is present
Here cum is a conjunction introducing a clause.
A learner often needs to distinguish these two uses by looking at what follows:
- if a noun in the ablative follows, it may be the preposition cum = with
- if a full clause follows, it is probably the conjunction cum = when/since/although
Why are abest and adest written as one word?
Because they are compounds of sum.
- abest = ab + est = is away / is absent
- adest = ad + est = is present / is here
These are standard Latin compound verbs:
- absum, abesse, afui = to be away, be absent
- adsum, adesse, adfui = to be present, be near, be here
So they are not separate words in normal Latin spelling.
Why do abest and adest both end in -est?
Because both are built from the verb sum, esse (to be) in the 3rd person singular present:
- est = he/she/it is
Then prefixes are added:
- ab- + est → abest
- ad- + est → adest
Since the subject is mater (mother, singular), the singular form est is used inside each compound.
Why are all the verbs in the present tense?
Because the sentence expresses a general truth or habitual situation:
- when the mother is absent, the baby cries
- when the mother is present, the baby becomes quiet
Latin often uses the present tense for this kind of general statement, just as English does:
- If the mother is away, the baby cries.
- When the mother is present, the baby is finally quiet.
So the present tense here is not necessarily about one single moment only; it can describe what regularly happens.
What exactly does lacrimat mean?
Lacrimat means cries, weeps, or literally sheds tears.
It comes from lacrimo, lacrimare. In beginner Latin, it is usually best understood simply as cries.
So:
- Infans lacrimat = The baby cries
What exactly does tacet mean?
Tacet means is silent, keeps quiet, or falls silent, depending on context.
It comes from taceo, tacere = to be silent.
In this sentence, demum tacet suggests something like:
- only then is quiet
- finally becomes silent
- at last stops making noise
So tacet is not just the abstract idea of silence; in context it means the baby stops crying and becomes quiet.
What does demum add to the sentence?
Demum adds the sense of only then, at last, or finally.
So:
- cum mater adest, demum tacet
does not mean merely when the mother is present, it is quiet. It means something stronger:
- when the mother is present, only then does the baby become quiet
- when the mother is present, the baby is quiet at last
It emphasizes that the mother’s presence is what finally brings silence.
Why is there no word for the before infans and mater?
Because Latin has no articles like English the or a/an.
So:
- infans can mean a baby, the baby, or just baby/child, depending on context
- mater can mean a mother or the mother
The context tells you which English article makes best sense. In this sentence, English naturally uses the:
- the baby
- the mother
Why doesn’t Latin use a subject pronoun like it or he/she with the verbs?
Because Latin usually does not need subject pronouns when the verb ending already tells you the person and number.
For example:
- lacrimat = he/she/it cries
- tacet = he/she/it is silent
- abest = he/she/it is absent
- adest = he/she/it is present
Since infans and mater are already stated, Latin does not need extra pronouns.
English often requires pronouns; Latin often leaves them out unless there is special emphasis.
Why is mater repeated instead of being left out the second time?
Latin could sometimes omit it if the meaning were clear, but repeating mater makes the structure neat and balanced:
- si mater abest
- cum mater adest
This creates a strong contrast:
- absent mother → baby cries
- present mother → baby becomes quiet
So the repetition is clear, rhythmic, and stylistically effective.
What kind of sentence is this overall?
It is a sentence with:
- a main clause: Infans ... lacrimat
- another main clause: ... demum tacet
- and two subordinate clauses:
- si mater abest
- cum mater adest
The semicolon separates the two main halves of the statement:
- Infans, si mater abest, lacrimat
- cum mater adest, demum tacet
So the sentence presents two contrasting situations involving the same baby.
Does infans specifically mean baby, or can it mean something broader?
Infans can mean infant, baby, or young child. Its basic sense is someone not yet speaking or very young.
In this sentence, English might translate it as:
- baby
- infant
- child
The most natural choice depends on the tone of the lesson or translation. Since the sentence involves crying and becoming quiet when the mother is present, baby is especially natural.
Is there anything important to notice about the punctuation?
Yes. The commas and semicolon help show the structure, even though Latin itself does not rely on punctuation in quite the same way as modern English.
Infans, si mater abest, lacrimat
The conditional clause is inserted inside the main statement.;
The semicolon marks a strong division between the first and second half.cum mater adest, demum tacet
The second half gives the contrasting situation.
So the punctuation helps the reader see the balance and contrast in the sentence.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Infans, si mater abest, lacrimat; cum mater adest, demum tacet to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions