Breakdown of Si veritatem dicis, nihil metuere debes.
Questions & Answers about Si veritatem dicis, nihil metuere debes.
Why is veritatem in the accusative case?
Because dicis means you say or you speak, and the thing being said is its direct object. In Latin, a direct object normally goes in the accusative case.
So:
- veritas = truth
- veritatem = truth, as the object of the verb
In this sentence, veritatem dicis literally means you speak the truth or more naturally you tell the truth.
Why does Latin use veritatem dicere for tell the truth instead of a verb meaning tell?
Latin often expresses tell the truth with veritatem dicere, literally to say the truth. This is a normal Latin idiom.
English uses tell in many places where Latin prefers say plus an object. So a learner should get used to the idea that Latin and English do not always package actions the same way.
What form is dicis?
Dicis is:
- 2nd person singular
- present tense
- active voice
- indicative mood
from the verb dico, dicere, dixi, dictum = say, speak, tell
So dicis means you say or you are saying, depending on context.
Why is nihil used here, and what case is it?
Nihil means nothing. In this sentence it is the direct object of metuere, so it means nothing in the sense of nothing to fear.
Traditional grammar discussions often connect nihil with the accusative, since it functions as the object. In practice, nihil is a fixed form and does not change here the way a regular noun would.
So:
- nihil metuere = to fear nothing
Why is metuere an infinitive?
Because it depends on debes.
Debeo means I ought, I must, or I should, and verbs like this are commonly followed by an infinitive in Latin. The infinitive tells you what someone ought to do.
So:
- debes = you ought
- metuere = to fear
- nihil metuere debes = you ought to fear nothing / you need fear nothing
This is very similar to English you ought to fear nothing.
What form is debes?
Debes is:
- 2nd person singular
- present tense
- active voice
- indicative mood
from debeo, debere, debui, debitum = owe, ought, must, should
In this sentence, debes does not mean you owe in a money sense. It means you ought or you should.
What kind of si sentence is this?
This is a simple or more vivid conditional with present indicative verbs:
- Si veritatem dicis = If you tell the truth
- nihil metuere debes = you should fear nothing
It presents the condition as real, general, or straightforward. It is not contrary-to-fact.
A learner can think of it as the ordinary kind of if sentence used for real situations.
Why are both verbs in the present tense?
Because the sentence expresses a general present idea:
- If you tell the truth, you need fear nothing.
Latin often uses the present tense in both parts of this kind of conditional when the meaning is general, habitual, or immediately relevant.
English can do the same:
- If you tell the truth, you have nothing to fear.
So the Latin tense choice is very natural.
Why is there no word for you?
Because Latin usually does not need a separate subject pronoun. The verb ending already shows the subject.
Here:
- dicis = you say
- debes = you ought
The ending -s tells us the subject is you singular.
Latin can add tu for emphasis, but it is not necessary:
- Si tu veritatem dicis, nihil metuere debes.
That would be more emphatic, something like If you are telling the truth...
Is the word order fixed?
No. Latin word order is more flexible than English because the endings show grammatical roles.
This sentence could appear in other orders, for example:
- Si dicis veritatem, nihil metuere debes.
- Nihil debes metuere, si veritatem dicis.
The original order is perfectly normal. It places the if clause first, then the main clause. Also, putting nihil before metuere debes gives it a little prominence: nothing is what you need fear.
Could nihil metuere debes also be translated you have nothing to fear?
Yes. That is often the most natural English rendering.
Literally, the Latin is closer to:
- you ought to fear nothing
- you should fear nothing
But in idiomatic English, you have nothing to fear often sounds better and expresses the same idea.
This is a good example of how a literal translation and a natural translation can differ.
How would this sentence be pronounced?
A common classroom pronunciation would be roughly:
- Si = see
- veritatem = weh-ree-TAH-tem or veh-ri-TAH-tem
- dicis = DEE-kis in restored classical pronunciation
- nihil = NEE-hil or sometimes NIH-il, depending on the system taught
- metuere = meh-TOO-eh-reh
- debes = DEH-bes
In classical pronunciation, c in dicis is always hard, like k.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Si veritatem dicis, nihil metuere debes to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions