Breakdown of Per rimam una gutta aquae in mensam cadit.
Questions & Answers about Per rimam una gutta aquae in mensam cadit.
What is the subject of the sentence?
The subject is una gutta aquae.
The main noun there is gutta = drop, and it is in the nominative singular, which is the normal case for the subject.
- una = one / a single, agreeing with gutta
- aquae = of water
So the whole subject means one drop of water.
Why is rimam in the accusative case?
Because per takes the accusative.
- per = through
- rimam is the accusative singular of rima = crack, fissure
So per rimam means through a crack.
This is a very common Latin pattern:
- per viam = through the road / along the road
- per urbem = through the city
Why is mensam also accusative?
Because in can take either the accusative or the ablative, depending on the meaning.
Here it takes the accusative because there is motion toward something:
- in mensam = onto the table / into the table's surface area
Compare:
- in mensam cadit = it falls onto the table
- in mensa est = it is on the table
So:
- in + accusative = movement into/onto
- in + ablative = position in/on
Why is it aquae and not aqua?
Because Latin uses the genitive to express of water.
- aqua = water
- aquae = of water
So gutta aquae literally means a drop of water.
This is a very normal Latin construction: noun + genitive.
Other similar examples:
- pars urbis = part of the city
- copia vini = a supply of wine
What exactly is una doing here?
Una is agreeing with gutta and means one or a single.
Since gutta is:
- feminine
- singular
- nominative
the form must be una.
This is from the numeral/adjective unus, una, unum = one.
So una gutta can mean:
- one drop
- a single drop
Depending on context, it may sound a little more emphatic than just English a drop.
Why is gutta aquae used instead of just aqua?
Because the sentence is not talking about water in general, but about one drop of water.
Latin often uses a noun plus a genitive to express this kind of idea:
- gutta aquae = a drop of water
- pars panis = a piece of bread
- multitudo hominum = a crowd of people
So aquae depends on gutta, not on the verb.
Why is the verb cadit at the end?
Because Latin word order is much more flexible than English word order, and it is very common for the verb to come at or near the end of the sentence.
So:
- Per rimam una gutta aquae in mensam cadit
is perfectly natural Latin.
But Latin could also rearrange the words without changing the basic meaning, for example:
- Una gutta aquae per rimam in mensam cadit
- In mensam per rimam una gutta aquae cadit
The endings, not the position alone, tell you how the words function.
Could the sentence be translated word-for-word into English?
Not very naturally.
A very literal order would be:
- Through a crack one drop of water onto the table falls.
That is understandable, but not normal English.
Latin allows this because the case endings show the relationships:
- rimam = object of per
- gutta = subject
- aquae = genitive
- mensam = object of in
- cadit = verb
So when reading Latin, it is usually better to focus on the forms and constructions rather than trying to force English word order onto it.
What form is cadit?
Cadit is:
- third person singular
- present tense
- active voice
- from cadere = to fall
So it means:
- he/she/it falls
Here the subject is una gutta aquae, which is singular, so cadit is singular too.
Why isn't it cadunt?
Because the subject is singular, not plural.
- una gutta = one drop
- therefore the verb must be singular: cadit
If the subject were plural, the verb would be plural too:
- guttae aquae cadunt = drops of water fall
Does in mensam mean into the table or onto the table?
In this sentence, it most naturally means onto the table.
Latin in + accusative can mean movement into or onto, depending on what makes sense with the noun.
With mensa = table, English usually says onto the table, because a drop falls onto the surface.
So although in often corresponds to English in, here the natural English meaning is onto.
Is per rimam describing where the drop falls or how it falls?
It describes the path the drop takes.
The drop falls through a crack. So per rimam tells you the route or channel through which the action happens.
That is exactly the kind of meaning per + accusative often has in Latin: movement through something.
Can Latin leave out words like the and a?
Yes. Latin has no articles equivalent to English the or a/an.
So:
- rima can mean a crack or the crack
- mensa can mean a table or the table
- gutta can mean a drop or the drop
The context decides which English article is best.
That is why una gutta can help add the sense one drop or a single drop, but Latin still does not have a true article.
Is una just the number one, or can it sound like a single?
It can do both.
In a sentence like this, una gutta may simply mean one drop, but it can also suggest a single drop.
So it may add a slight emphasis: not many drops, just one.
English often does the same thing:
- one drop of water
- a single drop of water
What is the dictionary form of each word?
Here are the basic dictionary forms:
- per = through
- rima, rimae = crack, fissure
- unus, una, unum = one
- gutta, guttae = drop
- aqua, aquae = water
- in = in, into, onto
- mensa, mensae = table
- cado, cadere, cecidi, casum = fall
Knowing the dictionary form helps you recognize why the forms in the sentence look the way they do:
- rimam from rima
- aquae from aqua
- mensam from mensa
- cadit from cadere
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Per rimam una gutta aquae in mensam cadit to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions