Breakdown of Aranea prope fenestram rete parvum facit; puer autem araneam tangere non audet.
Questions & Answers about Aranea prope fenestram rete parvum facit; puer autem araneam tangere non audet.
Where are the words for a and the in this sentence?
Latin usually has no articles, so there is no separate word for a, an, or the.
That means:
- aranea can mean a spider or the spider
- fenestram can mean a window or the window
- rete parvum can mean a small web or the small web
You decide from context which English article sounds best.
Why do we get aranea in the first clause but araneam in the second?
They are two different cases of the same noun:
- aranea = nominative singular → used for the subject
- araneam = accusative singular → used for the direct object
So:
- Aranea ... facit = the spider ... makes
- araneam tangere = to touch the spider
This is a very common first-declension pattern:
- nominative singular: -a
- accusative singular: -am
Why is fenestram accusative after prope?
Because prope is a preposition that takes the accusative.
So:
- prope fenestram = near the window
This is something you simply learn with the preposition:
- prope + accusative
Even though English near does not change the form of window, Latin does.
Why is it rete parvum and not something like retem parvum?
Because rete is a third-declension neuter noun.
A very important neuter rule is:
- nominative singular and accusative singular are the same
So rete can be either:
- nominative singular: web/net
- accusative singular: web/net
Here it is the direct object of facit, so it is accusative singular, but its form still stays rete.
Why is the adjective parvum and not parva or parvus?
Adjectives in Latin must agree with the nouns they describe in:
- gender
- number
- case
Since rete is:
- neuter
- singular
- accusative
the adjective must also be:
- neuter
- singular
- accusative
So we get:
- rete parvum
Even though rete and parvum come from different declension patterns, they still agree in case, number, and gender.
How do I know puer is the subject, and why is it not puerus?
Puer is a second-declension masculine noun, but some nouns in this declension keep the -er in the nominative singular instead of ending in -us.
So the dictionary form is simply:
- puer = boy
In this sentence, puer is the subject because it is in the nominative singular:
- puer ... non audet = the boy does not dare ...
So yes, puer is already the normal nominative form; Latin does not say puerus.
What exactly is facit here?
Facit is:
- third person singular
- present tense
- active voice
- from facere = to make / do
So aranea ... rete parvum facit literally means:
- the spider makes a small web
English might also say spins a small web, but Latin often uses a more general verb like facit.
Why is autem not the first word of its clause?
Because autem is commonly postpositive, which means it tends to come after the first word of its clause, not before it.
So Latin likes:
- puer autem = the boy, however / but the boy
rather than:
- autem puer
This is very normal Latin word order for autem.
Why is tangere in the infinitive?
Because audeo usually takes an infinitive to complete its meaning.
So:
- audet = he dares
- tangere = to touch
- tangere audet or audet tangere = he dares to touch
This is called a complementary infinitive: the infinitive completes the idea of the finite verb.
Is there a separate Latin word for the English to in to touch?
No. In Latin, the infinitive already includes that idea.
So:
- tangere = to touch
- facere = to make
- audere = to dare
The ending -re is part of the infinitive form. You do not add a separate word meaning English to.
Why is non placed before audet?
Non is the normal word for not, and here it negates the verb audet:
- non audet = does not dare
That is a very common placement. Latin word order is flexible, but putting non directly before the verb is straightforward and easy to understand.
How fixed is the word order in this sentence?
Latin word order is more flexible than English word order because the endings show each word’s job in the sentence.
For example:
- Aranea is the subject because it is nominative
- araneam is the object because it is accusative
- fenestram is accusative because prope requires it
- rete is the object of facit
So the sentence could be rearranged in various ways and still make grammatical sense. But the given order is natural because it:
- introduces the subject first
- keeps prope fenestram together
- places autem in its usual second position
- leaves non audet as a clear ending to the second clause
Latin word order often helps with emphasis and style, not just grammar.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Aranea prope fenestram rete parvum facit; puer autem araneam tangere non audet to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions