Breakdown of Postquam convivae cenaverunt, servae scutellas et pocula de mensa tollunt.
Questions & Answers about Postquam convivae cenaverunt, servae scutellas et pocula de mensa tollunt.
Why does the sentence begin with postquam?
Postquam is a conjunction meaning after. It introduces a subordinate clause that tells you when the action in the main clause happens.
So the structure is:
- Postquam convivae cenaverunt = after the guests dined / had eaten
- servae scutellas et pocula de mensa tollunt = the slave-women remove the bowls and cups from the table
Latin often uses a postquam clause to set the time before giving the main action.
Why is cenaverunt in the perfect tense?
Cenaverunt is perfect tense, third person plural, from ceno, cenare.
With postquam, Latin very often uses the perfect to describe an action that was completed before the next action happened:
- convivae cenaverunt = the guests ate / finished dining
The idea is that the dining is already completed, and only then do the slaves clear the table.
Why is tollunt present tense if the action seems to happen in the past?
This is a very common learner question. Tollunt is grammatically present tense, but Latin often uses the historical present in narratives. That means a present tense is used to describe past events more vividly.
So although tollunt literally means they remove or they are removing, in context it can naturally be translated as:
- the slave-women remove
- or, in smoother English narrative, the slave-women removed
This is not unusual in Latin storytelling.
How do I know convivae is the subject of cenaverunt?
You know because cenaverunt is third person plural, so its subject must be plural. Convivae can be nominative plural, and that fits perfectly:
- convivae = the guests
- cenaverunt = they dined / they have dined
So convivae is the subject of the subordinate clause.
How do I know servae means the slave-women here and not something else like to the slave-woman?
Formally, servae could have more than one grammatical value:
- nominative plural = slave-women
- genitive singular = of the slave-woman
- dative singular = to/for the slave-woman
But here the verb tollunt is third person plural, so it needs a plural subject. That tells you servae must be nominative plural here:
- servae tollunt = the slave-women remove
This is a good example of how Latin uses verb agreement to help you identify the function of a noun.
What case are scutellas and pocula?
Both are accusative plural, because they are the direct objects of tollunt.
The slaves are removing what?
- scutellas = bowls / dishes
- pocula = cups
So:
- scutellas = accusative plural of scutella
- pocula = accusative plural of poculum
They are the things being removed.
Why does pocula end in -a even though it is plural?
Because poculum is a neuter noun of the second declension.
A very important Latin rule is:
- neuter singular nominative/accusative often ends in -um
- neuter plural nominative/accusative often ends in -a
So:
- poculum = cup, singular
- pocula = cups, plural
This ending may look singular to an English speaker at first, but for neuter nouns in Latin, -a is a normal plural ending.
What case is mensa in de mensa, and why?
Mensa is ablative singular because it is governed by the preposition de.
De commonly takes the ablative and here means from or off:
- de mensa = from the table / off the table
So the slaves are removing the bowls and cups from the table.
What exactly does tollunt mean here?
The basic meaning of tollo, tollere is lift up, take away, remove, or carry off, depending on context.
Here, because the objects are dishes and cups and the phrase de mensa is added, the natural sense is:
- remove from the table
- take away from the table
- clear from the table
So tollunt is not just physically lifting; it means clearing the table.
Why is the word order different from normal English word order?
Latin word order is much more flexible than English word order because Latin uses endings to show grammatical function.
This sentence is arranged in a very natural Latin way:
- the time clause first: Postquam convivae cenaverunt
- then the main clause
- with the verb at the end: servae scutellas et pocula de mensa tollunt
English depends heavily on word order to show subject and object, but Latin does not need to do that as strictly. So the endings tell you who is doing the action and what is being acted on.
Could the main clause also have used a past tense instead of tollunt?
Yes. Latin could have used a past tense such as an imperfect or perfect, depending on the nuance. But tollunt as a historical present is very common and gives the scene a more immediate, vivid feel.
So a learner should understand that:
- tollunt is present in form
- but in narrative context it may be translated into natural English as a past
That is one of the most common things to notice in Latin prose.
What are the dictionary forms of the main words in the sentence?
Here are the likely dictionary forms:
- postquam = conjunction, after
- conviva, convivae = guest, dinner guest
- ceno, cenare, cenavi, cenatum = dine, eat dinner
- serva, servae = female slave, maidservant
- scutella, scutellae = small dish, bowl
- et = and
- poculum, poculi = cup, drinking vessel
- de
- ablative = from, down from, about
- mensa, mensae = table
- tollo, tollere, sustuli, sublatum = lift up, remove, take away
Knowing the dictionary forms helps you see how the sentence’s inflected forms are built.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Postquam convivae cenaverunt, servae scutellas et pocula de mensa tollunt to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions