Breakdown of Post longam horam discipula lassa dormit.
Questions & Answers about Post longam horam discipula lassa dormit.
Why is longam horam in the accusative?
Because post takes the accusative case in Latin when it means after.
- post = after
- horam = accusative singular of hora
- longam = accusative singular feminine of longus, agreeing with horam
So post longam horam means after a long hour.
A useful comparison:
- longa hora = nominative, a long hour
- longam horam = accusative, used here because of post
Why is lassa feminine?
Because it describes discipula, which is a feminine singular noun.
Latin adjectives must agree with the nouns they describe in:
- gender
- number
- case
So:
- discipula = feminine singular nominative
- lassa = feminine singular nominative
They match, so lassa means tired describing the female student / schoolgirl.
If the subject were masculine, you would expect:
- discipulus lassus dormit = the tired male student sleeps
Why is discipula nominative?
Because discipula is the subject of the sentence, and the subject of a finite verb is normally in the nominative case.
Here:
- discipula = the student
- dormit = sleeps
So discipula is the one doing the action of sleeping.
That is why it is nominative, not accusative.
Why is the verb dormit singular?
Because the subject, discipula, is singular.
- discipula = one female student
- dormit = she sleeps / the student sleeps
Latin verbs change form to match the subject:
- dormit = he/she/it sleeps
- dormiunt = they sleep
So if the subject were plural, you would get something like:
- discipulae lassae dormiunt = the tired female students sleep
Is lassa just an adjective attached to discipula, or does it mean something like being tired?
Primarily, it is an adjective describing discipula: the tired student.
So the phrase is naturally understood as:
- discipula lassa = the tired student
In context, Latin adjectives like this can also feel slightly descriptive in a looser way, almost like:
- the student, tired, sleeps
But for a learner, the safest understanding is that lassa simply modifies discipula.
Why doesn’t Latin use a word for the or a here?
Because Classical Latin has no articles.
So discipula can mean:
- a student
- the student
and longam horam can mean:
- a long hour
- the long hour
Which one sounds best depends on context and translation.
English requires an article, but Latin usually does not.
Can the word order change?
Yes. Latin word order is much freer than English word order because the endings show each word’s role.
So all of these could express basically the same idea:
- Post longam horam discipula lassa dormit.
- Discipula lassa post longam horam dormit.
- Dormit post longam horam discipula lassa.
The exact emphasis may change, but the grammar stays clear because of the endings:
- discipula = nominative subject
- longam horam = accusative after post
- dormit = verb
Does post longam horam mean after a long hour or for a long hour?
Here it means after a long hour, because of post.
That is an important distinction:
- post longam horam dormit = she sleeps after a long hour
- longam horam dormit = she sleeps for a long hour
So without post, the accusative can express duration of time.
With post, it means after.
Why is longam feminine?
Because it agrees with horam, and hora is feminine.
So:
- hora = feminine noun
- horam = accusative singular feminine
- longam = accusative singular feminine adjective
The adjective must match the noun it describes.
That is why Latin uses longam horam, not longum horam or longus horam.
Could discipula mean a male student too?
No. Discipula is specifically feminine.
- discipula = female student
- discipulus = male student
So this sentence refers to a female student unless the exercise is using discipula in a very broad school-context translation like student, while still keeping the grammatical femininity.
How do I know lassa goes with discipula and not with hora?
Because of both meaning and grammar.
Grammatically:
- discipula is nominative singular feminine
- lassa is nominative singular feminine
So they match.
But hora in this sentence is not nominative; it is horam, accusative singular feminine because it follows post. If lassa described horam, it would also need to be accusative:
- post longam lassam horam = after a long tiring hour or after a long tired hour depending on context, though that would be a different phrase
Since we have lassa, not lassam, it clearly goes with discipula.
What person and tense is dormit?
Dormit is:
- third person singular
- present tense
- active voice
- indicative mood
So it means:
- he sleeps
- she sleeps
- it sleeps
In this sentence, because the subject is discipula, it means she sleeps or the student sleeps.
Why doesn’t Latin need to say ea dormit for she sleeps?
Because the verb ending already tells you the person and number.
- dormit already means he/she/it sleeps
Latin often leaves subject pronouns out unless they are needed for emphasis or contrast.
So:
- dormit = she sleeps
- discipula dormit = the student sleeps
- ea dormit = she sleeps, with the pronoun stated for emphasis or clarity
That is why a separate word for she is unnecessary here.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Post longam horam discipula lassa dormit to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions