Log inSign up

Idem ianitor portam aperit et viatorem intrare iubet.

Idem ianitor portam aperit et viatorem intrare iubet.
The same doorkeeper opens the gate and orders the traveler to enter.
FromLesson 12inHardcore Latin
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Idem ianitor portam aperit et viatorem intrare iubet to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

navisportusNavis in portu stat.exireNoli foris exire, quia nox obscura est.Nauta navem parat ut cras e portu exeat.duocivis

Questions & Answers about Idem ianitor portam aperit et viatorem intrare iubet.

What does idem mean here, and why is it in front of ianitor?
Idem means the same or that same. It’s agreeing with ianitor (both are masculine singular nominative), so together idem ianitor means the same doorkeeper (as before). Putting idem first highlights the idea of “the same one.”
What case is ianitor, and how do I know it’s the subject?

Ianitor is nominative singular (a 3rd-declension noun). In this sentence it’s the subject because:

  • it’s nominative (the usual case for subjects)
  • the verbs aperit and iubet are 3rd person singular, matching a singular subject So (idem) ianitor is the one doing both actions.
Why is portam in the accusative?

Portam is accusative singular because it’s the direct object of aperit (opens).
Porta, -ae (f.) = gate/door, and portam is the form used for the gate as the thing being opened.

What tense and form is aperit?

Aperit is present tense, 3rd person singular, active indicative of aperire (to open).
So it means he/she opens (or in a story, often he opens).

Does et just mean and, or can it imply sequence?
Et primarily means and. In context it often also feels like and then, but Latin doesn’t require a separate word for “then.” Here it naturally reads as two linked actions: he opens the gate and (then) orders…
Why is viatorem accusative?

Viatorem is accusative singular because it’s the direct object of iubet.
The doorkeeper is giving an order to/at the traveler, and Latin commonly puts the person ordered in the accusative with iubeo.

Why do we get intrare (an infinitive) instead of a finite verb like “he enters”?

Because iubet (he orders) is followed by an infinitive to express what someone is ordered to do.
So viatorem intrare iubet literally means he orders the traveler to enter. This is a very common Latin pattern:
iubeo + accusative person + infinitive action.

Is viatorem intrare iubet an example of an “accusative and infinitive” construction?

Yes, it’s the same basic structure (accusative + infinitive), but used after a verb of commanding rather than (say) a verb of saying or thinking.

  • viatorem = accusative “subject” of the infinitive
  • intrare = infinitive “to enter”
    So the traveler is the one doing the entering, even though intrare isn’t a finite verb.
Why doesn’t Latin use something like ut + subjunctive here?

Latin can use ut + subjunctive for commands in some contexts, but with iubeo the most typical and straightforward construction is accusative + infinitive (as in this sentence).
So this sentence uses the standard pattern: iubet + (person) + infinitive.

Is the word order significant? Could it be rearranged?

Latin word order is flexible because endings show grammatical roles. This sentence is fairly “natural” and clear:

  • Idem ianitor (subject)
  • portam (object) aperit (verb)
  • et
  • viatorem (object of iubet) intrare (infinitive) iubet (verb) You could rearrange parts (e.g., ianitor portam aperit) without changing the basic meaning, but the emphasis might shift.
How should I pronounce ianitor and iubet (especially the letter i)?

In a common “classical-style” pronunciation:

  • ianitor sounds like yah-NEE-tor (initial i before a vowel acts like a consonant y)
  • iubet sounds like YOO-bet (again, i before a vowel gives a y sound) Also, v is often pronounced like w in classical pronunciation, so viatorem can sound like wee-ah-TOH-rem.