Breakdown of Amici nassam ex aqua extrahunt.
Questions & Answers about Amici nassam ex aqua extrahunt.
Why is amici the subject, and why does it end in -i?
Amici is the nominative plural of amicus, meaning friends.
In Latin, the subject of the sentence is usually put in the nominative case. For a regular second-declension masculine noun like amicus, the nominative plural ends in -i:
- amicus = friend
- amici = friends
So amici means the friends or simply friends, and it is the subject of extrahunt.
What form is nassam, and why does it end in -am?
Nassam is the accusative singular form of nassa.
The accusative case is commonly used for the direct object, the thing receiving the action. Here, the friends are pulling out the fish-trap / basket / net-like trap, so nassam is the object of extrahunt.
For a first-declension noun:
- nassa = a fish-trap
- nassam = a fish-trap, as a direct object
So amici nassam extrahunt means the friends pull out a fish-trap.
What does nassa mean exactly?
Nassa usually means a kind of fish-trap, basket trap, or wicker trap used in water.
It is not the most common basic word a beginner may know, so it can feel unfamiliar. In this sentence, the idea is that the friends are pulling some kind of trap up out of the water.
Why is it ex aqua? What case does ex take?
The preposition ex means out of or from, and it takes the ablative case.
That is why we get:
- aqua = water in the ablative singular
- ex aqua = out of the water
So the phrase tells you where the trap is being pulled from.
Why is it aqua and not aquam?
Because ex requires the ablative, not the accusative.
Compare:
- aqua = ablative singular
- aquam = accusative singular
Since ex must be followed by an ablative noun, Latin uses ex aqua, not ex aquam.
What does extrahunt mean, and how do we know who is doing the action?
Extrahunt means they pull out, they draw out, or they drag out.
It comes from the verb extraho, extrahere, extraxi, extractum.
The ending -unt tells you it is:
- present tense
- active voice
- third person plural
So extrahunt means they pull out. The subject matching that plural verb is amici = friends.
Why doesn’t the sentence need a separate word for they?
Latin verbs often include the subject in their endings.
The ending -unt in extrahunt already means they. Because of that, Latin does not need to add a separate pronoun unless it wants emphasis.
So:
- extrahunt = they pull out
The noun amici is still included here to name exactly who they are.
Is the word order important here?
Not as much as in English.
Latin relies heavily on case endings, so word order is often more flexible. In this sentence:
- amici is nominative plural, so it is the subject
- nassam is accusative singular, so it is the direct object
- aqua is ablative after ex
- extrahunt is the verb
So even if the order changed, the grammar would still show the roles clearly. For example, these would mean basically the same thing:
- Amici nassam ex aqua extrahunt
- Nassam amici ex aqua extrahunt
- Ex aqua amici nassam extrahunt
The chosen order is natural and clear, but Latin is not as rigid as English.
Why is there no word for the in the Latin sentence?
Classical Latin has no definite article and no indefinite article.
So Latin does not have separate words for the, a, or an. Depending on context:
- amici can mean friends or the friends
- nassam can mean a fish-trap or the fish-trap
- aqua can mean water or the water
English has to choose an article, but Latin usually leaves that to context.
What kind of verb is extraho? Is it related to traho?
Yes. Extraho is built from:
- ex- = out
- traho = I draw, pull
So extraho literally means I draw out or pull out.
This is very helpful for vocabulary-building, because many Latin verbs are made from a simple verb plus a prefix. If you know traho, then extraho is easier to understand.
How would this sentence be pronounced?
A reasonable classroom pronunciation would be:
AH-mee-kee NAHS-sam ex AH-kwa ex-TRAH-hoont
A few notes:
- amici = ah-MEE-kee in many traditional English-speaking classrooms, or AH-mee-kee in a more classical style
- nassam has a doubled ss, so the s sound is clearly held
- aqua is pronounced roughly AH-kwa
- extrahunt has trah like trah, not like English tray
Exact pronunciation depends somewhat on whether you are using a restored classical pronunciation or a traditional school pronunciation.
Could ex aqua mean from water instead of out of the water?
Yes, in a literal sense ex can mean both from and out of. But with a verb like extrahunt and a physical object being removed, English naturally says out of the water.
So although from the water is not wrong, out of the water is usually the best translation here because it matches the physical action more clearly.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Amici nassam ex aqua extrahunt to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions