bokjigwaneseo mogeumhago haengsajangeseo annaemuneul baebuhaeyo.

-에서 marks the place where an action happens.

So:

• 복지관에서 = at the welfare center
• 행사장에서 = at the event venue / at the event site

In this sentence, both actions happen in different places:

• 복지관에서 모금하고 = fundraise at the welfare center
• 행사장에서 안내문을 배부해요 = distribute handouts at the event venue

This is different from -에, which often marks a destination or location of existence rather than the place where an action is actively performed.

Because the sentence is connecting two actions, and each action has its own location.

The structure is:

• 복지관에서
  • 모금하고
• 행사장에서
  • 안내문을 배부해요

So the speaker is saying that one action is done at the welfare center, and another action is done at the event venue.

Korean often omits the subject, so this could mean:

• I fundraise at the welfare center and distribute handouts at the event venue
• We fundraise at the welfare center and distribute handouts at the event venue
• or a more general habitual statement like They do fundraising at the welfare center and distribute notices at the event venue

-고 connects verbs and usually means and.

So:

• 모금하고 배부해요 = fundraise and distribute

In this sentence, 모금하고 is the first action, and 배부해요 is the final verb.

A very common pattern in Korean is:

• Verb stem + -고 + Verb

Examples:

• 먹고 가요 = eat and go
• 공부하고 자요 = study and sleep
• 모금하고 안내문을 배부해요 = fundraise and distribute handouts

Depending on context, -고 can sometimes feel like simple sequence (do A and then do B) or just a neutral listing of actions (do A and B).

Because -고 attaches to the verb stem, not to the full polite form.

The verb here is 모금하다.

Conjugation:

• dictionary form: 모금하다
• stem: 모금하-
• connective form: 모금하고
• polite present: 모금해요

So in a connected sentence, you use:

• 모금하고 ... 배부해요

Only the final verb usually carries the polite ending -요.

That is why the sentence ends with 배부해요, while 모금하고 stays in connective form.

모금하다 means to raise funds or to collect donations.

It is a 하다 verb, built from:

• 모금 = fundraising / fund collection
• 하다 = to do

So literally it is something like to do fundraising.

This kind of noun + 하다 pattern is extremely common in Korean.

Other examples:

• 공부하다 = to study
• 운동하다 = to exercise
• 준비하다 = to prepare

안내문 means a notice, an informational sheet, or a handout depending on context.

The particle -을 marks it as the direct object of the verb.

So:

• 안내문을 배부해요 = distribute the notice/handout

Because 안내문 ends in a consonant, it takes -을 rather than -를.

Compare:

• 책을 읽어요 = read a book
• 편지를 써요 = write a letter

Here, 안내문 is the thing being distributed.

배부하다 is a more formal or official word meaning to distribute.

So 안내문을 배부해요 sounds natural in contexts like:

• offices
• events
• public institutions
• announcements
• volunteer work

나눠 주다 also means to hand out / give out, but it often sounds more everyday and conversational.

Compare:

• 안내문을 배부해요 = distribute informational handouts (formal/official)
• 전단지를 나눠 줘요 = hand out flyers (more everyday)

So in this sentence, 배부해요 fits well because 안내문 and the setting sound somewhat formal.

Yes. 배부해요 is the polite present-style ending.

It can express:

• present action
• habitual action
• a general statement about what someone does

So depending on context, this could mean:

• I am fundraising at the welfare center and distributing handouts at the event venue
• I fundraise at the welfare center and distribute handouts at the event venue
• We do fundraising at the welfare center and hand out notices at the event venue

Korean present forms often cover both simple present and present progressive-like meanings when the context is clear.

Yes. Korean often omits the subject when it is obvious from context.

This sentence does not explicitly say I, we, or they.

So the subject must be inferred from the situation. Possible implied subjects include:

• I
• we
• the staff
• the volunteers
• our organization

This is very normal in Korean. A full sentence with an explicit subject might be:

• 저희는 복지관에서 모금하고 행사장에서 안내문을 배부해요. = We fundraise at the welfare center and distribute handouts at the event venue.

But in natural Korean, leaving out the subject is often more common.

Yes, and this can help with vocabulary learning.

• 복지관

  • 복지 = welfare
  • 관 = building/hall/institution
  • so 복지관 = welfare center

• 행사장

  • 행사 = event
  • 장 = place/site/venue
  • so 행사장 = event venue / event site

• 안내문

  • 안내 = guidance / information
  • 문 = writing/document/text
  • so 안내문 = informational notice / written notice / handout

Korean vocabulary often becomes easier once you start noticing these building blocks.

Usually yes, at least loosely.

The sentence presents the actions in this order:

1. 복지관에서 모금하고
2. 행사장에서 안내문을 배부해요

With -고, this can simply mean do A and do B, but many learners naturally read it as A, then B if the context suggests a sequence.

So it may imply:

• first, fundraising happens at the welfare center
• then, handouts are distributed at the event venue

But the sentence does not strongly emphasize strict time order by itself. It mainly links the two actions together.

Usually and is the safest choice here.

-고 most commonly just connects actions:

• fundraise and distribute

Sometimes in context, English may phrase it more naturally in other ways, such as:

• We do fundraising at the welfare center and hand out notices at the event venue.
• We raise funds at the welfare center while distributing handouts at the event venue.

But grammatically, -고 itself does not specifically mean while in the same strong way as some other Korean structures. So for learners, it is best to understand 모금하고 here as fundraise and.

Yes, it sounds natural and somewhat formal or institutional.

That tone comes mainly from:

• 복지관 = a public/community institution word
• 모금하다 = fundraising vocabulary
• 행사장 = event-related vocabulary
• 안내문 = official-style written notice
• 배부하다 = formal distribute

So this sounds like something you might hear in:

• volunteer work
• a community organization
• an event announcement
• a staff explanation
• a report about duties

If you wanted a more casual style, the wording might change, but the original sentence is perfectly natural for a polite, practical context.