Breakdown of Aðalpersónan og aukapersónan eru góðar; persónusköpunin líka.
Questions & Answers about Aðalpersónan og aukapersónan eru góðar; persónusköpunin líka.
Why is eru plural when aðalpersónan and aukapersónan are both singular?
Because two singular nouns joined by og form a plural subject.
So:
- aðalpersónan = the main character
- aukapersónan = the supporting/secondary character
Together they mean the main character and the supporting character, so Icelandic uses the plural verb eru = are.
This works much like English:
- The boy and the girl are here
- Drengurinn og stúlkan eru hér
Why is the adjective góðar and not góð or góðir?
Góðar agrees with the subject.
In Icelandic, predicate adjectives usually match the subject in:
- gender
- number
- case
Here, both aðalpersóna and aukapersóna are feminine nouns. Since there are two of them joined by og, the subject is plural. As a subject, it is in the nominative.
So the adjective must be feminine plural nominative:
- masculine plural: góðir
- feminine plural: góðar
- neuter plural: góð
That is why góðar is the correct form here.
Why isn’t it góðu, since the nouns are definite?
This is a very common question.
In Icelandic, adjectives used before a definite noun often take a weak form:
- góða persónan = the good character
- góðu persónurnar = the good characters
But after vera (to be), the adjective is in predicate position, and predicate adjectives normally use the strong form:
- Persónurnar eru góðar = The characters are good
So even though the subject is definite, góðar is correct here because it is a predicate adjective, not an attributive one.
What do the endings -an and -in mean in aðalpersónan, aukapersónan, and persónusköpunin?
They are the suffixed definite article, the Icelandic equivalent of the.
Instead of usually having a separate word like English the, Icelandic often attaches the article to the end of the noun:
- persóna = character/person
persónan = the character
- persónusköpun = characterization / character creation
- persónusköpunin = the characterization
The exact article ending changes depending on the noun’s gender, number, and case.
Are aðalpersónan, aukapersónan, and persónusköpunin single words because Icelandic likes compounds?
Yes. Icelandic uses compounds very freely, and they are usually written as one word.
Here are the parts:
- aðal- = main, principal
- auka- = extra, secondary, supporting
- persóna = character/person
- sköpun = creation
So:
- aðalpersóna = main character
- aukapersóna = supporting/secondary character
- persónusköpun = characterization, literally something like character-creation
Then the definite article is added to the whole compound:
- aðalpersónan
- aukapersónan
- persónusköpunin
A useful rule: in Icelandic compounds, the last part is usually the core noun.
What case are these nouns in?
They are in the nominative.
Why?
- aðalpersónan og aukapersónan are the subject of eru
- persónusköpunin is the understood subject of the second part
Predicate adjectives after vera also stand in the nominative, so góðar is nominative plural feminine.
Why is there no verb in persónusköpunin líka?
Because Icelandic can omit repeated words when the meaning is obvious from the previous clause.
The full version would be something like:
In the original sentence, the second part is shortened for style. The reader understands the missing idea from the first part.
This kind of ellipsis is common in reviews, comments, and concise writing.
If I expanded the second half fully, would it be persónusköpunin eru líka góðar?
No. It would be:
- persónusköpunin er líka góð
That is because persónusköpunin is singular, not plural.
So in the full version:
- persónusköpunin = singular feminine subject
- er = singular is
- góð = singular feminine good
The plural forms eru góðar belong only to the first subject, where two feminine singular nouns are joined together.
Why is líka at the end?
Líka means also, too, or as well.
In the shortened second part, putting líka at the end works much like English too:
- persónusköpunin líka = the characterization too / the characterization as well
In a full clause, you would very often see:
- Persónusköpunin er líka góð
So the final position here is natural because the clause is elliptical and compact.
Why is there a semicolon instead of a comma or a full stop?
The semicolon links two closely related parts while still showing a pause stronger than a comma.
Here it is useful because:
- the second part is closely connected to the first
- the second part is shortened and depends on the first for its full meaning
So the semicolon neatly signals: first complete statement; second related, abbreviated statement
A full stop would also be possible, but the semicolon makes the connection tighter.
Would Icelandic still use góðar if one noun were masculine and the other feminine?
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning IcelandicMaster Icelandic — from Aðalpersónan og aukapersónan eru góðar; persónusköpunin líka to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions