Az asztal az enyém, a szék a tiéd.

The table is mine, the chair is yours.

Breakdown of Az asztal az enyém, a szék a tiéd.

• lenni: to be
• szék: the chair
• asztal: the table
• tiéd: yours
• enyém: mine

Questions & Answers about Az asztal az enyém, a szék a tiéd.

Why are there two occurrences of a/az in each clause?

Each clause has two noun phrases, and each needs its own determiner:

• First a/az = the definite article before the concrete noun: az asztal, a szék (“the table,” “the chair”).
• Second a/az = the required article before a standalone possessive pronoun: az enyém, a tiéd (literally “the mine,” “the yours,” i.e., “mine,” “yours”). In Hungarian, these possessive pronouns typically appear with the article when they stand alone as noun phrases, especially in sentences of identity like this.

Where is the verb “is”? Why isn’t there van?

In the present tense, 3rd person, Hungarian normally omits the copula in equational sentences (Noun = Noun/Pronoun). So:

• Az asztal az enyém. = “The table is mine.” (no van)
• Past/future keep the verb: Az asztal az enyém volt/lesz.
• Negation stays without van: Az asztal nem az enyém. (“The table is not mine.”)

Why is it az asztal but a szék, and az enyém but a tiéd?

Hungarian uses two forms of the definite article:

• az before a vowel sound (e.g., az asztal, az enyém)
• a before a consonant sound (e.g., a szék, a tiéd) This rule applies both to articles before nouns and to the article used with the standalone possessive pronouns.

Do I always need a/az before enyém/tiéd?

Almost always, yes, when these possessive pronouns are used as standalone noun phrases. The article can drop in certain emphatic, fronted orders (e.g., Enyém az asztal), but the safest, most neutral pattern is to include the article: Az asztal az enyém.

Can I say “Az asztal enyém” without the second az?

That’s not standard. You either say:

• Az asztal az enyém. (neutral)
• Or use a focused, fronted order: Enyém az asztal. (emphatic: “It’s MY table.”)

What exactly are enyém and tiéd? Are they related to én and te?

Yes. They are possessive pronouns meaning “mine” and “yours (singular).” They’re historically built from the personal pronouns plus a possessive marker:

• én → enyém (mine)
• te → tiéd (yours, singular) For reference, the full set is: enyém, tiéd, övé, miénk, tiétek, övék = mine, yours (sg), his/hers/its, ours, yours (pl), theirs.

How do I say “The chair is yours” when talking to more than one person, or when being formal?

• To more than one person (informal plural): A szék a tiétek.
• Polite/formal singular (addressing one person as Ön): A szék az Öné.
• Polite/formal plural (Önök): A szék az Önöké.

What’s the difference between az enyém and az én asztalom?

• az enyém = “mine” (a standalone possessive pronoun). It replaces a known/understood noun: Az asztal az enyém.
• az én asztalom = “my table” (a regular possessed noun with -om). Use this when you explicitly mention the noun: Ez az én asztalom. Both are correct; choose based on whether you want to name the noun or refer to it as “the one that is mine.”

Can I swap the order to emphasize ownership?

Yes. Word order carries emphasis in Hungarian.

• Az asztal az enyém. (neutral)
• Az enyém az asztal. (emphasizes “mine”)
• Enyém az asztal. (even stronger, more pointed emphasis) Similarly for the second clause: A tiéd a szék.

Is az here “the” or “that”?

Here it functions as the definite article “the.” Context makes that clear:

• az asztal = “the table”
• az enyém = “the one that is mine” When az means “that,” it usually appears as a demonstrative determiner with an additional article: az a szék (“that chair”).

Could I express the same meaning using the verb “to belong”?

Yes, with tartozik (“belong to”), though the equational pattern in the original is more natural:

• Az asztal hozzám tartozik, a szék hozzád tartozik. This is correct but sounds more formal/literary. Everyday Hungarian prefers the original equational structure with possessive pronouns.

How would I say “This is my table; that is yours”?

• Ez az én asztalom; az a tiéd. Here, ez = “this,” az = “that,” and the second a is the article before tiéd.

How do I negate the sentence?

Place nem before the predicate noun phrase:

• Az asztal nem az enyém, a szék nem a tiéd.

Is the comma instead of “and” (és) normal?

Yes. Hungarian often coordinates short, parallel clauses with just a comma (asyndetic coordination). You could also say:

• Az asztal az enyém, és a szék a tiéd. Both are fine; with or without és is a stylistic choice here.

Any pronunciation tips for tricky parts?

• asz- in asztal: the sz is like English “s”; asztal = roughly “AHZ-tahl.”
• ny in enyém: a palatal sound like the “ny” in “canyon.”
• Long vowels: é in enyém/tiéd is long, so keep it lengthened.