Breakdown of Az azonosításhoz megmutatom a bankszámlakivonatot, és az ügyintéző ellenőrzi az egyenleget.
Questions & Answers about Az azonosításhoz megmutatom a bankszámlakivonatot, és az ügyintéző ellenőrzi az egyenleget.
Why does azonosításhoz end in -hoz?
The ending -hoz means to / for / for the purpose of in this sentence.
- azonosítás = identification
- azonosításhoz = for identification / for the identification process
This is the allative ending, whose basic meaning is movement toward something, but it is also often used in expressions meaning for something.
So:
- Az azonosításhoz = For identification
Because of vowel harmony, this ending can appear as:
- -hoz
- -hez
- -höz
Here it is -hoz.
Why are there two az words at the beginning: Az azonosításhoz?
The first Az is the definite article: the.
The second word, azonosításhoz, just happens to begin with a as part of the noun. So this is not repetition of the same word in the same function.
- Az = the
- azonosításhoz = for identification
So Az azonosításhoz literally breaks down as:
- Az = the
- azonosításhoz = for identification
In natural English, you would usually just say For identification rather than For the identification.
Why is it megmutatom and not just mutatom?
The prefix meg- often gives the verb a completed, definite, result-oriented sense.
- mutat = show
- megmutat = show, show fully, show someone something
In many everyday contexts, Hungarian prefers megmutat when you mean to show someone something as a complete act.
So:
- megmutatom a bankszámlakivonatot = I show / I will show the bank statement
Also, megmutatom is in the definite conjugation, because the object is definite: a bankszámlakivonatot (the bank statement).
Why does megmutatom end in -om?
The -om ending shows:
- 1st person singular = I
- definite conjugation
So megmutatom means I show it / I am showing the specific thing.
Hungarian uses two main verb conjugations:
- indefinite conjugation
- definite conjugation
Here the object is definite:
- a bankszámlakivonatot = the bank statement
Because the object is definite, Hungarian uses the definite form:
- megmutatom
Compare:
- Megmutatok egy kivonatot. = I show a statement.
- Megmutatom a kivonatot. = I show the statement.
Why does bankszámlakivonatot end in -ot?
The ending -ot marks the direct object. This is the accusative case.
- bankszámlakivonat = bank statement
- bankszámlakivonatot = bank statement + accusative = the bank statement as the thing being shown
Hungarian marks direct objects with -t, but the exact form changes a bit depending on pronunciation, so here it becomes -ot.
So:
- megmutatom a bankszámlakivonatot = I show the bank statement
The direct object is what receives the action of the verb.
Why is bankszámlakivonat one long word?
Hungarian very often forms compound nouns by writing them as one word.
Here:
- bank = bank
- számla = account / bill
- kivonat = extract / statement
Together:
- bankszámlakivonat = bank account statement, usually just bank statement
This is completely normal in Hungarian. English often uses separate words where Hungarian prefers a single compound word.
What exactly does ügyintéző mean?
Ügyintéző is a person who handles official or administrative matters. Depending on context, it can mean:
- clerk
- administrator
- case handler
- customer service representative
- bank clerk
In this sentence, the most natural translation is something like the clerk or the bank employee handling the matter.
It comes from:
- ügy = matter, case, affair
- intéző = one who manages/handles
So it is literally something like a person who handles the case/matter.
Why is it ellenőrzi and not ellenőriz?
This is again the definite conjugation.
- ellenőriz = to check
- ellenőrzi = he/she checks it
The subject is:
- az ügyintéző = the clerk
And the object is definite:
- az egyenleget = the balance
Because the object is definite, Hungarian uses the definite verb form:
- ellenőrzi
Compare:
- Az ügyintéző ellenőriz egy adatot. = The clerk checks a piece of data.
- Az ügyintéző ellenőrzi az egyenleget. = The clerk checks the balance.
Why does egyenleget end in -et?
This is also the accusative ending, marking the direct object.
- egyenleg = balance
- egyenleget = balance + accusative = the balance as the thing being checked
The basic object marker is -t, but Hungarian often adds a linking vowel, so here you get -et.
So:
- ellenőrzi az egyenleget = checks the balance
Why is it a bankszámlakivonatot but az ügyintéző and az egyenleget?
Hungarian has two forms of the definite article:
- a
- az
Which one is used depends on the sound that follows:
- a before a consonant sound
- az before a vowel sound
So:
- a bankszámlakivonatot — because bankszámlakivonatot starts with b
- az ügyintéző — because ügyintéző starts with a vowel sound
- az egyenleget — because egyenleget starts with a vowel sound
- az azonosításhoz — because azonosításhoz starts with a vowel sound
This is similar to English a/an.
Is the word order fixed, or could it be changed?
Hungarian word order is fairly flexible, but changes in word order often change focus or emphasis, not just style.
The sentence as given is neutral and natural:
- Az azonosításhoz megmutatom a bankszámlakivonatot, és az ügyintéző ellenőrzi az egyenleget.
This presents the actions in a straightforward way.
You could move things around, but then the emphasis changes. For example:
A bankszámlakivonatot megmutatom az azonosításhoz.
This puts more focus on the bank statement.Az egyenleget az ügyintéző ellenőrzi.
This emphasizes that it is the clerk who checks the balance.
So yes, Hungarian allows movement, but it is not random; it affects what is highlighted.
Does Az azonosításhoz mean the same as Azonosításhoz without the article?
Very often, yes, the article can be omitted in expressions like this, especially if you are speaking a bit more generally.
- Az azonosításhoz = for the identification / for identification
- Azonosításhoz = for identification
Both can be natural, but the version with the article may sound a bit more specific or complete in context.
Hungarian often uses articles in places where English might not.
Can this sentence refer to the present or the future?
Yes. In Hungarian, the simple present can often express:
- a present action
- a habitual action
- a near-future action, depending on context
So:
- megmutatom can mean I show or I will show
- ellenőrzi can mean he/she checks or he/she will check
In this sentence, the exact time is understood from the situation. If this is describing what happens during a bank procedure, English might translate it as either:
- For identification, I show the bank statement, and the clerk checks the balance.
- For identification, I’ll show the bank statement, and the clerk will check the balance.
Both are possible depending on context.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning HungarianMaster Hungarian — from Az azonosításhoz megmutatom a bankszámlakivonatot, és az ügyintéző ellenőrzi az egyenleget to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions