Questions & Answers about הסוכן שלח את החוזה.
What does את mean here? It doesn’t seem to translate into English.
את is the marker of a definite direct object in Hebrew. It usually is not translated into English.
In הסוכן שלח את החוזה, the direct object is החוזה (the contract), and because it is definite, Hebrew uses את before it.
A quick comparison:
- הסוכן שלח חוזה = The agent sent a contract
- הסוכן שלח את החוזה = The agent sent the contract
So את tells you that the noun after it is the specific thing receiving the action.
Why is there ה־ at the beginning of הסוכן and החוזה?
ה־ is the Hebrew definite article, equivalent to the in English.
So:
- סוכן = agent
- הסוכן = the agent
- חוזה = contract
- החוזה = the contract
In this sentence, both nouns are definite:
- הסוכן = the agent
- החוזה = the contract
Why do we need both החוזה and את? Don’t they both show definiteness?
They do related jobs, but they are not the same thing.
- ה־ on החוזה makes the noun itself definite: the contract
- את marks that this definite noun is the direct object of the verb
So Hebrew normally needs both:
- שלח את החוזה = sent the contract
You can think of it this way:
- ה־ answers: which contract? → the contract
- את answers: what is receiving the action? → the direct object
What form is שלח?
שלח is the past tense, 3rd person masculine singular form of the verb לשלוח (to send).
So by itself it means:
- he sent
In the full sentence, the subject is הסוכן (the agent), which is masculine singular, so שלח matches it.
Related forms:
- הסוכן שלח = the agent sent
- הסוכנת שלחה = the female agent sent
How do I know הסוכן is masculine?
The noun סוכן is the masculine form meaning agent.
The feminine form is usually:
- סוכנת = female agent
That affects the verb in the past tense:
- הסוכן שלח את החוזה = The agent (male) sent the contract
- הסוכנת שלחה את החוזה = The agent (female) sent the contract
So the sentence uses the masculine form because the noun is masculine.
Why is the word order subject + verb + object here? Is that normal in Hebrew?
Yes. Subject + verb + object is very common in Modern Hebrew, and this sentence follows that pattern:
- הסוכן = subject
- שלח = verb
- את החוזה = direct object
So:
- הסוכן שלח את החוזה
This is a very natural Modern Hebrew sentence.
Hebrew can sometimes use other word orders for style, emphasis, or in more literary language, but for everyday speech this order is standard and easy to understand.
Could I leave out את and still be understood?
Sometimes people might still understand you from context, but in standard Hebrew you should not leave out את before a definite direct object.
So:
- Correct: הסוכן שלח את החוזה
- Not standard: הסוכן שלח החוזה
If the object is indefinite, then את is usually not used:
- הסוכן שלח חוזה = The agent sent a contract
So a good rule is:
- definite direct object → use את
- indefinite direct object → usually no את
What is the difference between חוזה and החוזה in pronunciation?
The difference is the added definite article ה־ at the beginning.
- חוזה = kho-ZEH / cho-ZEH depending how you represent the ח
- החוזה = ha-kho-ZEH / ha-cho-ZEH
The ח sound is not an ordinary English h. In Modern Hebrew it is usually pronounced like the ch in German Bach or Scottish loch.
So approximately:
- הסוכן = ha-so-KHEN
- שלח = sha-LAKH
- את = et
- החוזה = ha-kho-ZEH
What root does שלח come from?
שלח comes from the Hebrew root ש-ל-ח, which is connected with sending.
From this root you get forms like:
- לשלוח = to send
- שלח = he sent
- שלחה = she sent
- ישלח = he will send
- שלחו! = send! (plural / formal masculine)
Learning roots is very helpful in Hebrew because many related words and verb forms come from the same three consonants.
Why is את pronounced et if it’s written with the same letters as the word for you?
Great question. The spelling את can represent two different things:
- את = the direct object marker, pronounced et
- את = you (feminine singular), pronounced at
So the same spelling can have different pronunciations and meanings depending on context.
In this sentence, it must be the direct object marker, because it comes before החוזה:
- שלח את החוזה = sent the contract
It definitely does not mean you here.
Could this sentence mean something like mailed instead of just sent?
Yes, possibly. שלח basically means sent, but English may translate it differently depending on context.
For example, if the contract was sent by email, courier, post, or electronically, Hebrew may still use שלח.
So in context, the sentence could mean:
- The agent sent the contract
- The agent mailed the contract
- The agent forwarded the contract
But the basic meaning of the Hebrew verb is simply sent.
Is הסוכן always agent, or can it mean other things?
סוכן / הסוכן usually means agent, but the exact kind of agent depends on context.
It could refer to, for example:
- a business agent
- an insurance agent
- a travel agent
- even a secret agent
So הסוכן just means the agent, and the surrounding context tells you what kind of agent is meant.
How would this sentence change in the present tense?
In the present tense, Hebrew uses a participle-like form.
Masculine singular:
- הסוכן שולח את החוזה = The agent is sending / sends the contract
Compare:
- הסוכן שלח את החוזה = The agent sent the contract
- הסוכן שולח את החוזה = The agent sends / is sending the contract
Hebrew present tense often covers both the simple present and the progressive meaning, depending on context.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning HebrewMaster Hebrew — from הסוכן שלח את החוזה to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions