Ni ina tashi da asuba in kama hanya zuwa ofis.

Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Hausa grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Hausa now

Questions & Answers about Ni ina tashi da asuba in kama hanya zuwa ofis.

Why do we need both Ni and ina at the beginning? Don’t they both mean I?

Ni is an independent pronoun (I / me), and ina is the subject marker for I used with continuous/habitual actions (literally I am).

  • Ni adds emphasis or contrast: Ni ina tashi… = Me, I wake up… / I (personally) wake up…
  • In neutral speech, you could just say Ina tashi da asuba in kama hanya zuwa ofis.

So they do both point to I, but Ni is there for emphasis, not grammar.

What exactly does ina mean? Is it like the English verb to be?

Ina is a present-tense subject marker for I, often glossed as I am. You use it before a verb to express:

  • Ongoing actions: Ina cin abinci = I am eating.
  • Habitual actions: Ina tashi da asuba = I (usually) wake up at dawn.

So it overlaps with English am, but it also covers habitual meaning that in English you would show with usually / often / every day, not with am alone.

Does ina tashi mean I am waking up (right now) or I usually wake up?

It can mean either, depending on context:

  • Right now / around now: If someone calls you at 5 a.m. and you say Yanzu ina tashi, it means I’m waking up now.
  • Habitual: In a general statement like Ni ina tashi da asuba in kama hanya zuwa ofis, it is naturally heard as I (normally) wake up at dawn.

So ina + verb covers both present progressive and present habitual; the context tells you which one is intended.

What does tashi mean here? Is it specifically wake up?

In this sentence, tashi means to get up / to wake up (from sleep).

More generally, tashi is a very flexible verb meaning things like:

  • get up / stand up: Tashi ka zo nan = Get up and come here.
  • take off / depart (for vehicles/planes): Jirgi zai tashi = The plane will take off.
  • rise: Rana ta tashi = The sun has risen.

So the exact sense depends on context; with da asuba it naturally means wake up / get up from sleep.

Why is it da asuba and not a asuba? What does da do here?

In many time expressions, Hausa uses da (literally with) where English uses at or in. So:

  • da asuba = at dawn / at daybreak
  • da yamma = in the evening
  • da rana = in the daytime

You will also see a in some time expressions (a daren jiya = last night), but da asuba is the fixed, natural phrase for at dawn. If you said a asuba, it would sound unusual or non‑native in this context.

What time of day is asuba exactly? How is it different from safe (morning)?

Asuba is specifically dawn / very early morning, roughly the time around first light and the early morning prayer in Muslim contexts.

Safe, on the other hand, is morning more generally, after dawn and into the first part of the day.

  • Ina tashi da asuba = I get up at dawn (very early).
  • Ina tashi da safe = I get up in the morning (still early, but not necessarily at daybreak).

So asuba is earlier and more specific than safe.

What does in before kama hanya mean? Is it like to or so that?

Here in is a little subordinating particle that introduces a verb in the subjunctive mood. In this context, it often carries a sense like so that I can / in order to / for me to, or it just links a second action that follows from the first.

So ina tashi da asuba in kama hanya can be understood as:

  • I wake up at dawn so that I can set off, or
  • I wake up at dawn and (then) set off.

The in before kama marks that kama hanya is a subsequent or purpose-related action tied to ina tashi.

Could I say don in kama hanya instead of in kama hanya? What is the difference?

Yes, don in kama hanya is possible and makes the purpose more explicit.

  • in kama hanya = (then) I set out / so I can set out
  • don in kama hanya = in order that I may set out / so that I can set out

Don (or domin) strongly introduces purpose, similar to English in order to. Without don, Hausa often still implies purpose when one action follows another, so leaving don out here is natural and not incomplete.

What does the phrase kama hanya literally mean, and what does it mean idiomatically?

Literally, kama means to catch / seize / hold, and hanya means road / way / route. So kama hanya is literally to take hold of the road.

Idiomatically it means to set out / to leave / to start a journey or trip. Examples:

  • Zan kama hanya zuwa gida = I’m going to head home / I’ll set off for home.
  • Sun kama hanya tun jiya = They set out already yesterday.

So in this sentence, in kama hanya zuwa ofis = to set out for the office / to head to the office.

Is kama only used with hanya? Can I use it with other words?

Kama is a general verb meaning things like catch / seize / arrest / grip / hold, and it combines with many objects:

  • kama kifi = catch fish
  • kama barawo = catch a thief
  • kama aikin = take on the work / start the task

With hanya, it forms a particularly common idiom kama hanya = set off on a journey. So kama is not restricted to hanya, but kama hanya is a fixed, idiomatic combination.

What is the role of zuwa before ofis? Could I leave it out?

Zuwa is a preposition meaning to / toward. It introduces the destination:

  • zuwa ofis = to (the) office
  • zuwa gida = to home
  • zuwa kasuwa = to the market

In many casual contexts, Hausa speakers may drop zuwa when the direction is obvious (especially with motion verbs), so you might hear in kama hanya ofis in relaxed speech. However, zuwa ofis is clearer and more standard, especially for learners.

Is ofis a Hausa word? I have also seen ofishi.

Ofis is a loanword from English office, adapted to Hausa pronunciation. It is now a normal Hausa noun.

Ofishi is another borrowed form (influenced by English office or possibly French office), used in some regions and in some official/government contexts. In everyday urban Hausa, ofis is very common and fully acceptable:

  • Ina aiki a ofis = I work in an office.
  • Ofishin shugaban makaranta = the head teacher’s office. (here the noun is ofishi, with possessive ending)

So both exist; you will encounter each depending on dialect and register.

Could I change the word order, for example Ina tashi da asuba ni in kama hanya zuwa ofis?

You can move some elements for emphasis, but not all rearrangements sound natural. In this sentence:

  • Ni ina tashi da asuba in kama hanya zuwa ofis. (emphasis on I)
  • Ina tashi da asuba in kama hanya zuwa ofis. (neutral, very natural)

Putting ni after the verb (Ina tashi da asuba ni…) is not the usual way to emphasize the subject and will sound odd in most contexts. In Hausa, emphasis on the subject is usually done by putting the independent pronoun before the verb phrase (Ni ina…, Kai kana…, etc.), not after it.

Which parts of the sentence could be left out in everyday speech without really changing the meaning?

Depending on context, speakers might omit:

  • Ni, if there is no special emphasis:
    Ina tashi da asuba in kama hanya zuwa ofis.
  • Sometimes zuwa, when the direction is obvious:
    Ina tashi da asuba in kama hanya ofis. (more informal)
  • The whole in kama hanya zuwa ofis part, if you have already been talking about going to the office:
    Ina tashi da asuba. = I wake up at dawn.

The core structure (Ni) ina tashi da asuba is the main clause; the rest provides purpose and destination.