Maalla on hiljaista yöllä.

Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Finnish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Finnish now

Questions & Answers about Maalla on hiljaista yöllä.

What does "Maalla" mean exactly, and why does it end with -lla?

Maa means land, ground, but also countryside and country (as opposed to city).

Maalla is maa + -lla, where -lla is the adessive case. Here it has an idiomatic meaning:

  • maalla = in the countryside / in rural areas

So Maalla on hiljaista yöllä is understood as “It’s quiet in the countryside at night.”, not literally on the land in a physical sense.

What is the difference between maalla, maassa, maahan, and maalta?

All of these come from maa, with different cases:

  • maalla (adessive):

    • basic meaning: on the land, on the ground
    • idiomatic: in the countryside
    • example: Maalla on hiljaista.It’s quiet in the countryside.
  • maassa (inessive):

    • in the land / in the ground / in the country (as a state)
    • example: Maassa on rauha.There is peace in the country.
  • maahan (illative):

    • into the ground, into the country
    • example: Hän kaatui maahan.He/She fell to the ground.
  • maalta (ablative):

    • from the countryside / from the ground
    • example: Tulen maalta.I’m coming from the countryside.

In Maalla on hiljaista yöllä, maalla is specifically the “in the countryside” use.

Why is "yöllä" used for “at night”, and what case is that?

= night.

Yöllä is yö + -llä, again the adessive case.

Finnish often uses the adessive for time expressions meaning “at [time]”:

  • päivälläin the daytime / during the day
  • illallain the evening
  • kesälläin summer
  • yölläat night

So yöllä simply means “at night” or “during the night”.

Why does Finnish use -lla for both maalla (“in the countryside”) and yöllä (“at night”)? Are they the same thing grammatically?

Yes. Both maalla and yöllä are adessive case forms:

  • maa → maalla (on the land / in the countryside)
  • yö → yöllä (at night)

But they function slightly differently:

  • maalla is locative in space: in the countryside
  • yöllä is locative in time: at night

Grammatically the case is the same (adessive), but semantically one refers to place, the other to time.

What does "on" mean here, and why is it 3rd person singular if there is no clear subject like “it”?

On is the 3rd person singular of olla = to be.

Finnish uses this form in impersonal / existential sentences, where English would use “it is” or “there is”:

  • On hiljaista.It is quiet / There is silence.
  • Ulkona on kylmä.It is cold outside.

There is no explicit subject like it in Finnish; the verb on is used by default for these constructions.

So Maalla on hiljaista yöllä = It is quiet in the countryside at night, with on functioning like “there is / it is” but without “it” being a real subject.

Why is it "hiljaista" and not "hiljainen"? What is going on with that ending -a?

The basic adjective is:

  • hiljainen = quiet

Hiljaista is its partitive singular form:

  • hiljainenhiljaista (partitive)

In impersonal sentences describing a general state or atmosphere, Finnish often uses the partitive:

  • Täällä on hiljaista.It is quiet here.
  • Huoneessa on pimeää.It’s dark in the room.
  • Ulkona on lämmintä.It’s warm outside.

So Maalla on hiljaista follows this pattern: There is quietness / it is quiet (generally, as a state).

If you said “Tämä paikka on hiljainen”, you would use hiljainen (nominative) because you are describing a specific, definite subject (“this place is quiet”). With on hiljaista, you’re talking more about the state of things in general.

Is "hiljaista" singular or plural? It doesn’t look like an English adjective.

Hiljaista is an adjective in the partitive singular, not a noun and not plural.

  • Base form (nominative singular): hiljainenquiet
  • Partitive singular: hiljaista

Adjectives in Finnish inflect for case just like nouns. Here, hiljaista is used in the partitive due to the impersonal “there is quietness” type structure.

There is no direct English equivalent ending; you just translate it as “quiet” in “It’s quiet”.

Could you say "Maalla on hiljainen yöllä" instead?

No, that would be ungrammatical.

  • Hiljainen (nominative) would need a clear noun to modify:
    • Maalla on hiljainen yö.There is a quiet night in the countryside. (grammatical but very odd in normal conversation)

To mean “It is quiet in the countryside at night”, Finnish uses the partitive adjective:

  • Maalla on hiljaista yöllä.

Using hiljainen here would change the structure and imply something like a specific quiet night as an entity, which is not what is meant.

Can I change the word order, like "Yöllä maalla on hiljaista" or "Yöllä on hiljaista maalla"?

Yes, Finnish word order is flexible, and these variants are grammatically correct:

  • Maalla on hiljaista yöllä. – neutral: In the countryside it’s quiet at night.
  • Yöllä maalla on hiljaista. – emphasizes “at night”: At night, it’s quiet in the countryside.
  • Yöllä on hiljaista maalla. – stronger emphasis on “at night” as the topic, with “maalla” clarifying where.

The basic meaning remains the same, but the focus / emphasis shifts depending on what you put first.

Could I also say "Maalla on hiljaista öisin"? How is "öisin" different from "yöllä"?

Yes, you can.

  • yöllä = at night (at that time, more like a specific time frame)
  • öisin = plural adverbial form from meaning at nights, at night(s) in general, on nights

So:

  • Maalla on hiljaista yöllä. – It is quiet at night (e.g. tonight / at night generally, but feels a bit more concrete).
  • Maalla on hiljaista öisin. – It is quiet at night(s) (habitually, usually at night).

Öisin has a more habitual, recurring feel.

In English we say “in the countryside” and “at night”, but Finnish has no articles. Am I missing something like “the” in "Maalla on hiljaista yöllä"?

Finnish has no articles (a, an, the), so:

  • maalla covers both “in the countryside” and “in a countryside” (if that made sense)
  • yöllä covers “at night” / “at the night” (context decides)

Articles are simply not marked in Finnish. The sentence Maalla on hiljaista yöllä relies on context, and in natural English we choose “in the countryside” and “at night”.

Is "Maalla on hiljaista yöllä" an example of an “existential sentence” in Finnish?

Yes.

An existential sentence typically:

  1. Starts with a location or setting (here: Maallain the countryside)
  2. Uses on (3rd sg of olla)
  3. Has something that exists / is the case there (here: hiljaista – quietness, a quiet state)

Pattern:

  • [Place] + on + [something / state].

Examples:

  • Huoneessa on pimeää.It’s dark in the room.
  • Täällä on kylmää talvella.It’s cold here in winter.
  • Maalla on hiljaista yöllä.It’s quiet in the countryside at night.