Log inSign up

Rohkea joukkue voitti lopulta, ja pelko muuttui iloksi.

Rohkea joukkue voitti lopulta, ja pelko muuttui iloksi.
The brave team finally won, and the fear turned into joy.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Finnish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Finnish now

Questions & Answers about Rohkea joukkue voitti lopulta, ja pelko muuttui iloksi.

What does rohkea mean exactly, and how is it used with joukkue?

Rohkea means brave / courageous / bold. It’s an adjective.

In rohkea joukkue:

  • rohkea = brave
  • joukkue = team
  • Both are in nominative singular, because the whole phrase is the subject of the sentence.

In Finnish, descriptive adjectives that directly modify a noun usually:

  • Come before the noun: rohkea joukkue = a brave team
  • Agree with the noun in case and number:
    • rohkea joukkue (nominative singular)
    • rohkean joukkueen (genitive singular)
    • rohkeaa joukkuetta (partitive singular)

So rohkea joukkue is the basic, dictionary-form subject “(a/the) brave team.”

Why is there no word for “a” or “the” before rohkea joukkue or pelko?

Finnish has no articles (no equivalents of a/an/the), so you just say:

  • rohkea joukkue = a brave team or the brave team
  • pelko = fear or the fear

The context decides whether English would use a, the, or no article:

  • In a match report, rohkea joukkue would usually be understood as “the brave team” (a specific team everyone knows from context).
  • pelko in this sentence refers to a specific fear that’s already understood from context, so English translation will usually choose “the fear” or just “fear”.

Finnish doesn’t mark this distinction grammatically; you infer it from context.

What kind of word is joukkue, and why is it singular, not plural?

Joukkue is a noun meaning team (especially in sports). It’s singular nominative here: (se) joukkue voitti – “(that) team won”.

Like English team, joukkue is a collective noun:

  • It refers to a group of people, but grammatically it is singular.
  • The verb agrees with the grammatical number, not with the idea of “many people”.

So:

  • Joukkue voitti. = The team won. (3rd person singular)
  • If you wanted to talk about the players as individuals, you’d use a plural noun:
    • Pelaajat voittivat. = The players won. (3rd person plural)

In this sentence, Finnish matches English very well: joukkue voitti = the team won.

How is voitti formed, and what’s its basic grammar?

Voitti is the 3rd person singular past tense of the verb voittaa (to win; to defeat).

  • Dictionary form: voittaa
  • Stem: voitta-
  • Past marker: -i-
  • 3rd person singular ending: (no extra ending; just the stem+past)

So:

  • hän voitti = he/she won
  • joukkue voitti = the team won

About transitivity:

  • voittaa is normally transitive:
    • Joukkue voitti ottelun. = The team won the match.
    • Suomi voitti Ruotsin. = Finland defeated Sweden.

But Finns very often leave out the object when it’s obvious:

  • Joukkue voitti. = The team won (it / the game / the competition).
    This is natural Finnish; the missing object is understood from context.
What does lopulta mean exactly, and how is it different from words like vihdoin or lopuksi?

Lopulta is an adverb; literally from loppu (end) + -lta (from), so originally “from the end”, but as an adverb it means:

  • lopulta ≈ eventually, in the end, after all

Typical use: something took a while, there may have been difficulties, but eventually this result happened:

  • Rohkea joukkue voitti lopulta.
    → The brave team eventually won / won in the end.

Compare:

  • vihdoin = finally, at last

    • Emphasises relief after waiting:
      • Vihdoin voitimme! = We finally won!

  • lopuksi = in the end, lastly (as the last step/point)

    • Often used in lists or speeches:
      • Lopuksi kiitän kaikkia. = Finally/Lastly, I thank everyone.

In this sentence, lopulta focuses on the outcome after a process, which fits “after everything, they ended up winning.”

Why is there a comma before ja? I thought you usually don’t put a comma before “and”.

English usually avoids a comma before and between two closely linked clauses; Finnish rules are different.

In Finnish, you do put a comma between two independent clauses, even if they are joined by ja (and), mutta (but), etc.

Here we have two full clauses:

  1. Rohkea joukkue voitti lopulta
  2. pelko muuttui iloksi

Because each has its own subject and verb, they are separate independent clauses, so Finnish punctuation requires:

  • Rohkea joukkue voitti lopulta, ja pelko muuttui iloksi.

In English, you would normally write:
“The brave team eventually won, and fear turned into joy.”
(Comma is optional in English, but in Finnish it’s obligatory here.)

What is pelko grammatically, and what does it mean here?

Pelko is a noun meaning:

  • fear, fearfulness, terror, depending on context.

In this sentence:

  • pelko is in nominative singular
  • It is the subject of the second clause:
    • pelko muuttui iloksi = fear turned into joy / the fear turned into joy

Conceptually, it refers to the fear people were feeling before the team’s victory. Finnish uses a simple abstract noun here, just like English “fear”.

What is the verb muuttui and how is it different from muutti?

Muuttui is the 3rd person singular past tense of muuttua.

  • muuttua = to change, to turn (into), to become (intransitive – something changes itself)
  • muuttua stem: muuttu-
  • Past marker: -i-
  • 3rd singular: muuttui

So:

  • pelko muuttui iloksi = fear turned into joy / changed into joy.

Muutti, on the other hand, is from muuttaa:

  • muuttaa = to change (something) OR to move (house) (transitive or intransitive in different meanings)
  • Hän muutti suunnitelmaa. = He/She changed the plan.
  • Hän muutti Helsinkiin. = He/She moved to Helsinki.

So:

  • muuttui = became / turned into (subject is changing)
  • muutti = changed (something) / moved (somewhere)

In this sentence, we need the intransitive idea “fear itself changed”, so muuttui is correct.

What case is iloksi, and what does it literally mean?

Iloksi is the translative case of ilo (joy).

  • ilo (nominative) = joy
  • iloksi (translative) ≈ into joy, to joy, so that it became joy

The translative case (-ksi) is used especially for:

  1. Change of state / becoming something

    • Pelko muuttui iloksi. = Fear turned into joy.
    • Vesi jäätyi jääksi. = The water froze into ice.
    • Hän kasvoi aikuiseksi. = He/She grew up to be an adult.

  2. Role or purpose

    • Valitsin hänet johtajaksi. = I chose him/her as leader.
    • Ostin tämän lahjaksi. = I bought this as a present.

So pelko muuttui iloksi literally is “fear changed into joy,” and iloksi encodes that “new state” grammatically.

Why is it muuttui iloksi and not something like muuttui iloiseksi?

Both are possible, but they mean slightly different things:

  • muuttui iloksi

    • ilo (joy, noun) → iloksi (into joy)
    • Focus on the emotion itself changing category: fear became joy.
    • Very natural when you talk about one feeling turning into another.

  • muuttui iloiseksi

    • iloinen (happy, adjective) → iloiseksi (into being happy)
    • Focus on someone’s state becoming happy:
      • Hän muuttui iloiseksi. = He/She became happy.

In this sentence, we’re talking about “fear” (a feeling) turning into “joy” (another feeling), so muuttui iloksi (noun → noun) is the most natural phrasing.

Can I change the word order, like “Rohkea joukkue lopulta voitti” or “Lopulta rohkea joukkue voitti”?

Yes, Finnish word order is flexible, and all of these are grammatically correct:

  1. Rohkea joukkue voitti lopulta.
  2. Rohkea joukkue lopulta voitti.
  3. Lopulta rohkea joukkue voitti.

Differences:

  • Neutral / most common statement:

    • Rohkea joukkue voitti lopulta.
    • Subject – verb – adverbial, like English.

  • Emphasising “in the end / eventually”:

    • Lopulta rohkea joukkue voitti.
    • Starting with lopulta draws attention to the eventual outcome, maybe implying there was tension or doubt before.

  • Rohkea joukkue lopulta voitti.

    • Feels a bit more speech-like; lopulta is inserted in the middle, giving a slight emphasis, like “the brave team did eventually win.”

All versions mean the same basic thing; word order mainly shades the focus or emphasis, not the core meaning.

Why is there no pronoun like “se” (“it”) before voitti or muuttui?

Finnish is a pro-drop language: subject pronouns are often omitted when clear from context and verb form.

In the sentence:

  • Rohkea joukkue voitti lopulta
    • Subject is rohkea joukkue, so no need for se (it)
  • pelko muuttui iloksi
    • Subject is pelko, so no need for se either

You would not normally say:

  • ✗ Rohkea joukkue se voitti lopulta
  • ✗ Pelko se muuttui iloksi

Those would sound marked or emphatic and usually need a special context.

English must use pronouns (it, he, she) or repeat nouns; Finnish often just uses the noun once and then relies on verb endings or context.

Is the adjective always before the noun in Finnish, like rohkea joukkue?

For basic attributive adjectives (simple descriptions), yes: they normally go before the noun:

  • iso talo = big house
  • uusi auto = new car
  • rohkea joukkue = brave team

Only in special, more poetic or contrastive contexts would you put the adjective after the noun:

  • joukkue rohkea – would sound poetic or highly emphatic, not neutral.

So for everyday Finnish, you should keep the pattern:

[adjective] [noun] → rohkea joukkue, vanha ystävä, kylmä vesi.