Pirmahan mo ang papel na ito, at bibigyan kita ng kopya mamaya.

Pirmahan comes from pirma (signature / sign) plus the suffix -han.

In this sentence, pirmahan means to sign something or to put your signature on something.

A useful comparison:

• Pirmahan mo ang papel = Sign the paper
• Pumirma ka sa papel = Sign on the paper

So pirmahan makes the paper more directly central in the sentence, while pumirma focuses more on the act of signing.

Because Filipino uses different pronoun sets depending on the verb pattern.

With pirmahan, the sentence is using a non-actor-focus pattern, so the doer takes the form mo.

Compare:

• Pumirma ka = You sign / Sign
• Pirmahan mo ang papel = Sign the paper

So:

• ka is used with actor-focus forms like pumirma
• mo is used with forms like pirmahan

This is a very common pattern in Tagalog/Filipino.

Ang is a marker. It is often translated loosely as the, but it is not exactly the same as the English article.

In this sentence, ang papel na ito is the noun phrase that the verb is centered on:

• Pirmahan mo ang papel na ito

Here, ang marks the paper as the main target of the action.

So it is better to think of ang as a focus/topic marker, not just as the.

Both are correct and natural.

• papel na ito
• itong papel

Both mean this paper.

In papel na ito, the noun comes first, then the demonstrative:

• papel = paper
• na = linker
• ito = this

The na links the noun and the modifier.

So papel na ito literally works like paper + this, but in natural English it is simply this paper.

It is a linker.

The linker connects words inside a noun phrase. Here it connects:

• papel
  • ito

So:

• papel na ito = this paper

A useful detail:

• After a word ending in a consonant, the linker is often na
• After a word ending in a vowel, it is often -ng

Example:

• papel na ito
• libro'ng ito or more commonly aklat na ito depending on the word used

So na here is grammatical glue.

Yes. That is completely natural.

These are basically equivalent:

• Pirmahan mo ang papel na ito
• Pirmahan mo itong papel

The second version is a little more compact, but both are common and correct.

Bibigyan comes from the root bigay (give).

A useful breakdown is:

• bigay = give
• bigyan = give someone something
• bibigyan = will give / going to give

The bi- reduplication helps mark the contemplated aspect, which often corresponds to English future.

So in normal translation:

• bibigyan = will give

Strictly speaking, Filipino is usually described as marking aspect more than tense, but for a learner, will give is a very good way to understand it here.

Here, kita means I ... you.

So:

• bibigyan kita = I will give you

This is a special pronoun form used when:

• the doer is I
• the receiver/target is you (singular)

You will also see it in sentences like:

• Mahal kita = I love you
• Nakikita kita = I see you

So kita is not just a simple standalone word like you. It packages the relationship I → you into one form.

Because with bigyan, the person receiving is the main target of the verb, and the thing being given is marked with ng.

So in:

• Bibigyan kita ng kopya

the roles are:

• kita = the person receiving
• ng kopya = the thing being given

This is very common with bigyan-type sentences.

So ng here does not mean of in the English sense. It is marking kopya as the item involved in the giving.

You can say that. It is also correct.

The difference is mainly what the sentence is built around.

• Bibigyan kita ng kopya mamaya = I’ll give you a copy later
  • focus is on you as the recipient
• Ibibigay ko sa iyo ang kopya mamaya = I’ll give the copy to you later
  • focus is more on the copy

Both are natural. Filipino often has several correct ways to express nearly the same idea, with slightly different focus.

Mamaya usually means later, in a little while, or later on.

Very often it refers to later the same day, but the exact time depends on context.

So in this sentence:

• mamaya = later

It sounds natural and conversational.

Yes, to a degree.

For example, the second clause could also be:

• Mamaya, bibigyan kita ng kopya.

That said, not everything can move freely. Filipino has flexibility, but the markers and verb forms still determine the roles of the words.

The original order sounds very natural:

• Pirmahan mo ang papel na ito, at bibigyan kita ng kopya mamaya.

It feels like:

1. first the instruction
2. then the promise/result

The original sentence is neutral to casual.

It uses:

• mo = singular you
• kita = I → you

That is fine in everyday speech with someone you can address normally.

If you want to sound more polite or respectful, you might say something like:

• Pirmahan n’yo po ang papel na ito, at bibigyan ko po kayo ng kopya mamaya.

That version uses:

• po for politeness
• n’yo / kayo for a respectful or plural you

So the original is not rude, but it is not especially formal either.