Ayaw naming mapansin ang lobo.

Ayaw expresses not wanting, refusal, or dislike.
When it is followed by a verb phrase, it works a lot like English don’t want to ....

So here, ayaw introduces the action that is not wanted: mapansin ang lobo.

Naming is the linked form of namin.

It comes from:

• namin = we / our (exclusive)
• plus the linker -ng

So:

• namin + -ng → naming

That linker connects the pronoun to the following verb phrase:

• Ayaw naming umalis
• Gusto naming kumain
• Ayaw naming mapansin ang lobo

This is a very common pattern in Filipino.

No. Naming comes from namin, which is the exclusive form of we.

That means:

• namin / naming = we, but not including you

If the speaker wanted to include the listener, Filipino would use natin / nating instead:

• Ayaw nating mapansin ang lobo

So this sentence uses exclusive we.

Because kami and namin do different jobs.

• kami is a nominative form
• namin is a genitive form

With mapansin, the thing being noticed is marked by ang, so the experiencer/doer is expressed with a genitive pronoun like:

• ko
• mo
• niya
• namin

That is why you get naming, not kami.

A useful comparison:

• Napansin namin ang lobo = We noticed the balloon/wolf.
• Napansin kami ng lobo = The balloon/wolf noticed us.

Mapansin is the base / infinitive-like form used after ayaw.

After words like ayaw, gusto, puwede, and similar expressions, Filipino commonly uses this non-finite verb form rather than a fully marked past or future form.

Compare:

• napansin = noticed
• mapapansin = will notice
• mapansin = to notice / notice, in a dependent or non-finite sense

So after ayaw, mapansin is the expected form.

The root is pansin, which is related to notice or attention.

Mapansin is the common verb meaning to notice.
The ma- pattern often has a sense that something happens naturally, unintentionally, or comes into awareness rather than being done in a strongly deliberate way.

For a learner, the simplest and safest way to remember it is:

• pansin = notice / attention
• mapansin = notice, become aware of

Because ang lobo is the thing being noticed.

In this pattern, ang marks the participant that the verb is centered on. With mapansin, that is the thing noticed.

So:

• Ayaw naming mapansin ang lobo = the lobo is what is being noticed

If you change it to ng lobo, the meaning changes:

• Ayaw naming mapansin ng lobo

That would mean the lobo is the one doing the noticing, so the sentence becomes We don’t want to be noticed by the wolf.

That contrast is very useful for understanding ang vs ng.

Filipino does not need a separate word like English to in this kind of structure.

English says:

• don’t want to notice

Filipino simply uses:

• ayaw naming mapansin

So the idea of to notice is built into the verb form and the construction itself. No extra word is necessary.

It can mean either balloon or wolf. Context tells you which one is intended.

So if you see lobo by itself, it may be ambiguous in writing. In real conversation, the surrounding situation usually makes the meaning clear.

For many learners, balloon is the meaning they meet first, but wolf is also a valid word.

You can make similar ideas with gusto, but ayaw is the more direct and natural everyday way to say do not want to.

So:

• Ayaw naming mapansin ang lobo sounds straightforward and idiomatic.

Using ayaw is usually the best choice when the meaning is simple unwillingness or lack of desire.