او بعد از صحبت با پرستار، دیگر گریه نکرد.

او can mean either he or she. Persian does not normally mark gender in third-person singular pronouns, so you need context to know which one is meant.

So:

• او = he / she
• the verb does not help you distinguish gender either

That is why the sentence could mean either:

• He didn’t cry anymore after talking to the nurse.
• She didn’t cry anymore after talking to the nurse.

بعد از means after.

It is a very common prepositional expression:

• بعد از کلاس = after class
• بعد از غذا = after food / after the meal
• بعد از صحبت با پرستار = after talking with the nurse

A helpful way to think of it is:

• بعد = after / later
• از = of / from

But together, بعد از functions as the fixed expression after.

Because after بعد از you often get a noun phrase or verbal noun-like expression, not necessarily a full finite clause.

Here, صحبت is being used like talking or conversation:

• بعد از صحبت با پرستار = after talking with the nurse

This is very natural in Persian. English also does something similar:

• after talking to the nurse
• not necessarily after he/she talked to the nurse

If you wanted a full clause, you could say something like:

• بعد از اینکه با پرستار صحبت کرد، دیگر گریه نکرد.
• After he/she talked with the nurse, he/she didn’t cry anymore.

Both are natural, but the original version is shorter and very common.

In this sentence, صحبت means talking, speaking, or conversation.

The expression صحبت کردن means to talk / to speak.
So in:

• بعد از صحبت با پرستار

the word صحبت is functioning as the non-finite verbal idea talking.

You can think of it as:

• صحبت کردن با پرستار = to talk with the nurse
• بعد از صحبت با پرستار = after talking with the nurse

It can mean either, depending on context.

Persian has no definite or indefinite article exactly like English the and a in all situations. So:

• پرستار can mean nurse, a nurse, or the nurse

In this sentence, English would often translate it as the nurse if the nurse is already known in the situation, but a nurse is also structurally possible.

So:

• با پرستار = with the nurse / with a nurse

Context tells you which is best.

Here, دیگر means anymore or no longer.

So:

• دیگر گریه نکرد = didn’t cry anymore / no longer cried

This word often appears in negative sentences to show that something stopped happening.

Examples:

• دیگر نمی‌آید. = He/She doesn’t come anymore.
• دیگر نگران نبود. = He/She was no longer worried.
• دیگر گریه نکرد. = He/She didn’t cry anymore.

Because گریه کردن is a compound verb, and compound verbs are extremely common in Persian.

Here:

• گریه = crying
• کردن = to do

Together:

• گریه کردن = to cry

In the past negative:

• کرد = did
• نکرد = did not do

So:

• گریه کرد = cried
• گریه نکرد = did not cry

Many Persian actions are built this way:

• صحبت کردن = to talk
• فکر کردن = to think
• استفاده کردن = to use
• گریه کردن = to cry

نکرد is the simple past negative of کردن (to do).

Breakdown:

• کرد = did
• نـ
  • کرد = نکرد = did not do

Since گریه کردن is a compound verb, Persian negates the light verb part:

• گریه کرد = cried
• گریه نکرد = did not cry

This is very typical in Persian compound verbs.

Because دیگر is an adverb, and in Persian adverbs commonly appear before the verb phrase.

So the structure is:

• او = subject
• بعد از صحبت با پرستار = time phrase
• دیگر = adverb
• گریه نکرد = verb phrase

This is a very normal Persian word order.

You will often see adverbs placed right before the verb:

• او سریع رفت. = He/She left quickly.
• او دیگر نیامد. = He/She didn’t come anymore.
• او هنوز خواب است. = He/She is still asleep.

Yes, very normal.

Persian usually places the verb at the end, and other elements come before it. In this sentence, the order is:

• او = subject
• بعد از صحبت با پرستار = time/background information
• دیگر = adverb
• گریه نکرد = verb at the end

So Persian is following its usual verb-final tendency.

A very literal order would be something like:

• He/She after talking with the nurse anymore cry did-not.

That sounds strange in English, but it is perfectly natural in Persian.

Not always. The comma is mainly a punctuation choice to mark a pause.

So both of these are acceptable:

• او بعد از صحبت با پرستار، دیگر گریه نکرد.
• او بعد از صحبت با پرستار دیگر گریه نکرد.

The comma helps separate the introductory phrase بعد از صحبت با پرستار from the rest of the sentence, but in everyday Persian writing, punctuation can be somewhat flexible.

Yes. Persian often drops subject pronouns when the meaning is clear from context.

So you could say:

• بعد از صحبت با پرستار، دیگر گریه نکرد.

This still means:

• After talking with the nurse, he/she didn’t cry anymore.

Because the verb کرد shows third person singular, and Persian speakers often rely on context rather than explicitly saying او every time.

Yes, absolutely.

A more explicit version would be:

• او بعد از اینکه با پرستار صحبت کرد، دیگر گریه نکرد.

This means the same thing, but it uses a full subordinate clause:

• after he/she talked with the nurse

Compare:

• بعد از صحبت با پرستار = after talking with the nurse
• بعد از اینکه با پرستار صحبت کرد = after he/she talked with the nurse

The original sentence is more compact, while the بعد از اینکه... version is more explicit. Both are natural.