اگر از این راه بروی، به موقع به کلاس میرسی.

A natural breakdown is:

• اگر = if
• از = from, by, via
• این = this
• راه = way, road, route
• بروی = you go
• به موقع = on time
• به کلاس = to class
• میرسی = you arrive / you get there

So the sentence is literally something like:

If by this route you go, on time to class you arrive.

In natural English: If you go this way, you'll get to class on time.

Because after اگر in this kind of future condition, Persian commonly uses the present subjunctive.

• بروی = present subjunctive, you go
• می‌روی = present indicative, usually you go / you are going

In this sentence, the meaning is not about what you are doing right now; it is about a possible future action:

• اگر از این راه بروی... = If you go this way...

That is why بروی sounds right here.

This is very normal in Persian. The present tense often expresses a future result when the context already makes the future meaning clear.

So:

• به موقع به کلاس میرسی literally looks like you arrive to class on time
• but in context it means you will arrive / you'll get to class on time

English often uses will here, but Persian usually does not need a separate future marker in everyday speech.

از این راه means by this way, via this route, or through this route.

Although از often means from, it can also mean by way of or via in expressions like this.

So:

• از این راه بروی = go by this route / go this way

It does not necessarily mean you are physically coming from the road. Here it means you are using that route.

They belong to two different expressions:

• به موقع = on time
• به کلاس = to class

So the first به is part of a time expression, and the second به marks direction/destination.

This is completely normal in Persian. It is not redundant.

Usually به موقع means on time, meaning not late.

In this sentence:

• به موقع به کلاس میرسی = you'll get to class on time

Depending on context, it can sometimes overlap with in time, but the most natural translation here is on time.

It is singular informal you.

So this sentence is addressed to one person in an informal way:

• بروی = you go
• میرسی = you arrive

If you wanted formal or plural you, you would say:

• اگر از این راه بروید، به موقع به کلاس می‌رسید.

The verb رفتن means to go.

Its present stem is رو.
To make the present subjunctive for you (singular):

• بـ = subjunctive prefix
• رو = present stem
• ی = second-person singular ending

So:

• ب + رو + ی = بروی

That is why بروی means that you go / if you go.

Yes. In everyday speech, many speakers say بری instead of بروی.

So colloquially, you may hear:

• اگر از این راه بری، به موقع به کلاس می‌رسی.

This means the same thing.
The version with بروی is more standard/written, while بری is very common in speech.

Because Persian is generally a verb-final language.

So in both clauses, the verb tends to come last:

• اگر از این راه بروی
• به موقع به کلاس میرسی

This is different from English, where verbs usually come earlier.

Yes, Persian word order is somewhat flexible, especially with adverbs and prepositional phrases, but the verb usually still stays near the end.

For example, you may also hear:

• اگر از این راه بروی، به کلاس به موقع می‌رسی.

That still makes sense, though به موقع به کلاس میرسی sounds very natural.

So the exact order of به موقع and به کلاس can vary, but the original sentence is perfectly normal.

A simple pronunciation guide is:

agar az in râh beravi, be moghe be کلاس miresi

More carefully:

• اگر = agar
• راه = râh
• بروی = beravi
• به موقع = be moghe'
• میرسی = miresi

A natural full reading is:

agar az in râh beravi, be moghe be kelâs miresi

Yes, it can. Persian present forms often cover both:

• a specific future result: If you go this way, you'll get to class on time
• a general rule: If you go this way, you get to class on time

In most everyday contexts, English prefers you'll get for this sentence, but the Persian can naturally cover both ideas depending on context.