Mission—Team—FAQ—Privacy—Terms—Sponsors—Grammar—Typing Course—Donate

© 2026 Elon Automation B.V.

Learn Hardcore Esperanto: Ĉi tiu broĉo estas el alia epoko. - This brooch is from another era.

Hardcore Esperanto
/Browsing and bargaining at a flea market
/Ĉi tiu broĉo estas el alia epoko.

Ĉi tiu broĉo estas el alia epoko.

Ĉi tiu broĉo estas el alia epoko.

This brooch is from another era.

Breakdown of Ĉi tiu broĉo estas el alia epoko.

Questions & Answers about Ĉi tiu broĉo estas el alia epoko.

What does ĉi tiu mean, and why are there two words?

Ĉi tiu means this.

It is made of:

tiu = that
ĉi = a particle that makes it mean this instead of that

So:

tiu broĉo = that brooch
ĉi tiu broĉo = this brooch

You may also see tiu ĉi, which means the same thing. Both are correct:

ĉi tiu broĉo
tiu ĉi broĉo

How do you pronounce ĉi tiu broĉo?

A rough English guide is:

ĉi ≈ chee
tiu ≈ TEE-oo or almost tyoo
broĉo ≈ BRO-cho with ĉ like ch in church

A few key points:

ĉ is always like English ch
o is a pure vowel, like o in Italian or Spanish, not a diphthong
stress in Esperanto usually falls on the second-to-last syllable

So:

broĉo → BRO-cho
epoko → e-PO-ko

Why does broĉo end in -o?

the era; period

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching Esperanto grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Esperanto now

In Esperanto, nouns normally end in -o.

So:

broĉo = brooch
epoko = epoch / era

This makes it very easy to recognize parts of speech:

-o = noun
-a = adjective
-e = adverb
-i = infinitive verb

Why is it alia epoko and not just alia or alie?

Alia means other or another, and it is an adjective. Adjectives in Esperanto end in -a.

Since it describes the noun epoko, it must be in adjective form:

alia epoko = another era

Compare:

alia = another, other
alie = elsewhere / in another way

So alie epoko would be wrong, because alie is an adverb, not an adjective.

Why is it alia epoko and not alian epokon?

Because this phrase is not a direct object. It comes after estas and is part of the predicate.

In Esperanto, the -n ending is usually used for:

direct objects
sometimes direction

Here, alia epoko is simply part of the meaning from another era, so no accusative is needed.

That is why we get:

Ĉi tiu broĉo estas el alia epoko.

not:

Ĉi tiu broĉo estas el alian epokon.

What does el mean here?

El usually means out of, from, or made of, depending on context.

In this sentence, el alia epoko means from another era.

So el is expressing origin or source, not physical motion. It suggests that the brooch seems to belong to a different historical period.

You can compare:

el ligno = made of wood
el la domo = out of the house
el alia epoko = from another era

Why is it el and not de?

That is a very common question.

Both el and de can sometimes be translated as from, but they are not used in the same way.

el often means out of, from inside, or originating from
de often means of, from, or by, especially with possession, authorship, or a more general source

In el alia epoko, the idea is that the brooch seems to come out of or originate in another era. That is why el sounds natural here.

Examples:

libro de Maria = Maria’s book
mi ricevis ĝin de ŝi = I got it from her
vazo el vitro = a vase made of glass
objekto el la mezepoko = an object from the Middle Ages

Is estas el alia epoko a literal statement, or can it be figurative?

It can be either, depending on context.

Literally, it can mean the brooch is actually from another historical period.

Figuratively, it can mean the brooch looks very old-fashioned or seems to belong to a different age stylistically.

English does something similar when we say something is from another era.

Why is there no word for a or an before alia epoko?

Esperanto has no indefinite article. There is no separate word for a or an.

So:

broĉo can mean a brooch or just brooch, depending on context
alia epoko can mean another era

Esperanto does have a definite article:

la = the

But there is no equivalent of English a/an.

Could the sentence also be written as Tiu ĉi broĉo estas el alia epoko?

Yes. That is completely correct and means the same thing.

Both of these are normal:

Ĉi tiu broĉo estas el alia epoko.
Tiu ĉi broĉo estas el alia epoko.

Learners often meet ĉi tiu first, but tiu ĉi is equally grammatical.

What is the basic sentence structure here?

The structure is:

Ĉi tiu broĉo = subject
estas = verb
el alia epoko = prepositional phrase describing the subject

So the pattern is essentially:

This brooch is from another era.

Word-by-word:

Ĉi tiu = this
broĉo = brooch
estas = is
el = from
alia = another
epoko = era / epoch

Can epoko mean both epoch and era?

Yes. Epoko can refer to a period of time, and in many contexts English might translate it as either epoch or era.

In a sentence like this, era often sounds more natural in English:

This brooch is from another era.

But the Esperanto word itself covers that general idea of a historical period.

Why is estas used instead of some verb meaning comes from?

Because Esperanto often uses a simple to be + prepositional phrase structure where English does too.

So:

estas el alia epoko = is from another era

This is natural and idiomatic Esperanto. You could sometimes rephrase ideas in other ways, but estas el is straightforward and correct here.

Your questions are stored by us to improve Elon.io