Ni sekvas ĉi tiun principon.

Breakdown of Ni sekvas ĉi tiun principon.

ni
we
ĉi tiu
this
sekvi
to follow
principo
the principle

Questions & Answers about Ni sekvas ĉi tiun principon.

Why is it ni and not mi or something else?

Ni means we. Esperanto subject pronouns are very regular:

  • mi = I
  • vi = you
  • li = he
  • ŝi = she
  • ĝi = it
  • ni = we
  • ili = they

So Ni sekvas... means that we are the ones doing the action.

Why does sekvas end in -as?

In Esperanto, verbs always show tense with a fixed ending. The ending -as marks the present tense.

So:

  • sekvas = follow / are following
  • sekvis = followed
  • sekvos = will follow

A very important point for English speakers: the verb ending does not change depending on the subject. So:

  • mi sekvas
  • vi sekvas
  • li sekvas
  • ni sekvas

They all use sekvas in the present tense.

What does sekvi mean, and why is it sekvas here?

Sekvi is the dictionary form, meaning to follow. The -i ending is the infinitive.

When you actually use the verb in a sentence, you change the ending:

  • sekvi = to follow
  • sekvas = follow / follows / are following
  • sekvis = followed
  • sekvos = will follow

So sekvas is just the present-tense form of sekvi.

Why do both tiun and principon end in -n?

The ending -n marks the direct object in Esperanto. The direct object is the thing directly affected by the action.

In this sentence, we follow what?
We follow this principle.

So this principle is the direct object, and both the noun and its matching modifier take -n:

  • tiu principo = that/this principle
  • tiun principon = that/this principle as a direct object

This is a very common pattern in Esperanto:

  • Mi vidas la domon. = I see the house.
  • Ŝi legas interesan libron. = She reads an interesting book.

Anything describing the noun also agrees with it.

Why is it ĉi tiun instead of just tiun?

Tiu means that or sometimes that one.
When you add ĉi, it makes it specifically this or this one, meaning something near the speaker or current context.

So:

  • tiu principo = that principle
  • ĉi tiu principo = this principle

In the sentence, because the phrase is a direct object, both parts change as needed:

  • base form: ĉi tiu principo
  • object form: ĉi tiun principon

A useful thing to remember is that ĉi often appears with tiu and related words:

  • ĉi tie = here
  • ĉi tiu = this
  • ĉi tio = this thing
Why does ĉi stay the same and not change?

Because ĉi is an invariable little word. It does not take endings like -n or -j.

So when the phrase changes, the parts that agree are tiu and principo, but ĉi stays unchanged:

  • ĉi tiu principo
  • ĉi tiun principon

That is completely normal.

What is the basic word order in this sentence?

The sentence uses the most common Esperanto word order: subject + verb + object.

  • Ni = subject
  • sekvas = verb
  • ĉi tiun principon = object

So the structure is very similar to normal English: We follow this principle.

Because Esperanto marks the object with -n, word order can sometimes be more flexible than in English. But this sentence uses the straightforward, standard order.

Could the sentence be written in a different order?

Yes, Esperanto allows some flexibility because the object is clearly marked by -n.

For example, Ĉi tiun principon ni sekvas would still mean We follow this principle.

That said, Ni sekvas ĉi tiun principon is the most neutral and natural order for a beginner to learn first.

Why is it principon and not principojn?

Because the sentence refers to one principle, not several.

  • principo = principle
  • principon = principle as a direct object
  • principoj = principles
  • principojn = principles as a direct object

So if the sentence were about more than one principle, it would be:

  • Ni sekvas ĉi tiujn principojn. = We follow these principles.
How is ĉi tiun principon pronounced?

A rough pronunciation guide:

  • ĉi ≈ chee
  • tiun ≈ TEE-oon
  • principon ≈ prin-TSEE-pon

A few pronunciation notes:

  • ĉ sounds like ch in church
  • c sounds like ts
  • Esperanto stress is usually on the second-to-last syllable

So:

  • SEK-vas
  • TI-un
  • prin-TSI-pon
Is there an article like the in this sentence, and why isn’t la used?

Esperanto does have the definite article la, meaning the. But it is not used here because ĉi tiu already identifies the noun clearly as this principle.

Compare:

  • la principo = the principle
  • ĉi tiu principo = this principle

You normally would not say la ĉi tiu principo. The demonstrative already does the job of specifying the noun.

What is the base form of the noun phrase here?

The base form is ĉi tiu principo.

Then, because it is the direct object, it becomes:

  • ĉi tiu principo → ĉi tiun principon

This is a useful habit in Esperanto: when you see a complicated noun phrase, try identifying its basic form first, then see what endings were added for grammar.

AI Language TutorTry it ↗
Your avatar
“What's the best way to learn Esperanto grammar?”
Esperanto grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Esperanto

Master Esperanto — from Ni sekvas ĉi tiun principon to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions