Breakdown of La retumilo ĉesis funkcii dum la interrompo.
Questions & Answers about La retumilo ĉesis funkcii dum la interrompo.
Why is retumilo used here, and how is that word built?
Retumilo is a compound Esperanto word.
- ret- relates to the internet / network
- umi is a general-purpose verb ending often used in words like retumi, meaning to browse the internet / surf the web
- -ilo means tool / instrument
So retumilo literally means a tool for browsing, which is why it means browser.
This kind of word-building is very common in Esperanto, and learning the parts can make vocabulary much easier to remember.
Why does the sentence begin with la? Does Esperanto use the like English?
Yes. La is the definite article in Esperanto, and it works roughly like English the.
So:
- la retumilo = the browser
- la interrompo = the interruption
A few useful things about la:
- It does not change for singular or plural.
- It does not change for gender.
- It stays la no matter what role the noun has in the sentence.
Esperanto has no separate word for English a/an, so an indefinite noun often appears with no article at all.
Why is it ĉesis and not ĉesigis?
This is an important distinction.
- ĉesi = to stop, to come to an end
- ĉesigi = to make something stop, to cause something to stop
In the sentence, the browser itself stopped functioning, so ĉesis is correct:
- La retumilo ĉesis funkcii = The browser stopped functioning
If you said ĉesigis, that would mean something like caused to stop, so you would normally need an object:
- La interrompo ĉesigis la retumilon = The interruption stopped the browser
So ĉesis is the intransitive form, and ĉesigis is the causative/transitive form.
Why is funkcii in the infinitive after ĉesis?
Because Esperanto often uses a structure like:
- ĉesi + infinitive = to stop doing something
- komenci + infinitive = to begin doing something
- daŭrigi + infinitive = to continue doing something
So:
- ĉesis funkcii = stopped functioning
Here:
- ĉesis is the finite verb in the past tense
- funkcii stays in the infinitive because it expresses the action that stopped
This is very similar to English stopped working / stopped functioning, though Esperanto uses the infinitive more directly.
Why is the verb funkcii and not funkcii?
Because the root is funkci-, and the infinitive ending is -i.
So:
- funkcii = funkci- + i = to function
It may look unusual because there are two i's in a row, but that is completely normal in Esperanto. The first i is part of the root, and the second i is the infinitive ending.
Other forms are:
- funkcias = functions / is functioning
- funkciis = functioned / was functioning
- funkcios = will function
What does dum mean here, and why doesn’t la interrompo have -n?
Dum means during.
So:
- dum la interrompo = during the interruption
After dum, you normally do not use -n, because dum is a preposition, and prepositions in Esperanto usually take the basic noun form, not the accusative.
So this is correct:
- dum la interrompo
not:
- dum la interrompon
The -n ending is mainly used for direct objects and for certain expressions of direction.
What kind of word is interrompo, and how is it formed?
Interrompo is a noun meaning interruption.
It comes from the root interromp-, related to interrupting or breaking continuity, plus the noun ending -o:
- interrompi = to interrupt
- interrompo = interruption
This is another example of Esperanto’s regular word-building:
- -i for the verb
- -o for the noun
So if you know one form, you can often recognize the others easily.
Could the sentence also be La retumilo ne funkciis dum la interrompo? What is the difference?
Yes, that is possible, but the meaning is slightly different.
La retumilo ĉesis funkcii dum la interrompo
= The browser stopped functioning during the interruptionThis focuses on the moment or event of stopping.
La retumilo ne funkciis dum la interrompo
= The browser was not functioning during the interruptionThis focuses on the state of not working during that time.
So ĉesis funkcii emphasizes the change, while ne funkciis emphasizes the condition.
Is the word order fixed, or could it be changed?
Esperanto word order is fairly flexible, but the basic order here is the most natural:
- La retumilo ĉesis funkcii dum la interrompo.
This follows a clear pattern:
- subject: La retumilo
- verb: ĉesis
- infinitive complement: funkcii
- time phrase: dum la interrompo
You could move dum la interrompo for emphasis:
- Dum la interrompo la retumilo ĉesis funkcii.
That still means the same thing, but it puts more focus on the time expression.
How do I pronounce ĉesis and ĉ in general?
The letter ĉ is pronounced like English ch in church.
So:
- ĉesis sounds roughly like CHEH-sis
A few pronunciation notes:
- Esperanto letters are pronounced consistently
- e is like e in met
- stress usually falls on the second-to-last syllable
So:
- ĉe-sis → stress on ĉe
- re-tu-MI-lo
- funk-ci-I
- in-ter-ROM-po
That regular stress pattern is one of the helpful features of Esperanto.
Why does retumilo end in -o, while funkcii ends in -i?
Because Esperanto uses regular endings to show the part of speech.
- -o = noun
- -i = infinitive verb
- -as = present tense verb
- -is = past tense verb
- -os = future tense verb
So in this sentence:
- retumilo is a noun: browser
- ĉesis is a past-tense verb: stopped
- funkcii is an infinitive verb: to function
- interrompo is a noun: interruption
These endings are a core part of Esperanto grammar and help you understand sentences quickly.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning EsperantoMaster Esperanto — from La retumilo ĉesis funkcii dum la interrompo to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions