Hvad angår genhusningen, svarer forsikringsselskabet i morgen.

Hvad angår means as for, regarding, or with regard to.

So:

• Hvad angår genhusningen = As for the rehousing / Regarding the rehousing

Literally, angå means concern or be about, so hvad angår ... is an idiomatic way of introducing a topic.

It is not a word-for-word match with English what concerns ..., even though that is close to the literal structure.

Yes, it is a normal expression, but it sounds a bit more formal or written than very everyday spoken Danish.

Other common ways to say something similar are:

• med hensyn til = with regard to
• angående = regarding
• om = about (often more everyday, depending on context)

So Hvad angår genhusningen is perfectly good Danish, but in casual speech some people might choose a simpler phrasing.

Genhusningen is the definite form of genhusning.

Breakdown:

• genhusning = rehousing / temporary relocation to another home
• genhusningen = the rehousing

The ending -en is the definite article added to the noun, like the in English.

So instead of saying the rehousing, Danish usually attaches the definiteness to the end of the noun:

• en genhusning = a rehousing
• genhusningen = the rehousing

Because Danish, like English, often makes compound nouns, but Danish usually writes them as one word.

forsikringsselskabet breaks down like this:

• forsikring = insurance
• selskab = company
• forsikringsselskab = insurance company
• forsikringsselskabet = the insurance company

The final -et is the definite ending for a neuter noun, so:

• et forsikringsselskab = an insurance company
• forsikringsselskabet = the insurance company

This is because Danish follows the V2 rule in main clauses: the finite verb usually comes in the second position.

Here, the sentence begins with the topic phrase:

• Hvad angår genhusningen

Because that comes first, the finite verb must come next:

• Hvad angår genhusningen, svarer forsikringsselskabet i morgen.

So the order is:

1. fronted phrase
2. finite verb
3. subject

If you started directly with the subject, then you would get:

• Forsikringsselskabet svarer i morgen.

Both are grammatical, but the first version emphasizes the topic genhusningen.

Because Danish often uses the present tense for the future when the time is clear from the context.

Here, i morgen already tells us the action happens in the future, so svarer naturally means:

• will reply tomorrow
• is replying tomorrow

This is very similar to English sentences like:

• The company answers tomorrow
  though in English we more often say
• The company will answer tomorrow

In Danish, the present tense is very common in this kind of sentence.

Yes, you could say:

• Hvad angår genhusningen, vil forsikringsselskabet svare i morgen.

That is also correct.

The difference is roughly this:

• svarer i morgen = a simple, natural future based on context
• vil svare i morgen = explicitly marks the future, and sometimes can add a slight sense of intention or promise

In many everyday cases, the present tense version sounds more natural and less heavy.

Here svare means reply or give an answer.

It can correspond to English answer or reply, depending on context.

A useful point is that Danish uses svare in slightly different patterns:

• svare = reply / answer
• svare på noget = answer something
• besvare noget = answer something in a more direct/transitive way

So in this sentence, there is no direct object. It simply means:

• the insurance company will reply tomorrow

The comma separates the introductory topic phrase from the main clause.

So:

• Hvad angår genhusningen, = As for the rehousing,
• svarer forsikringsselskabet i morgen. = the insurance company will reply tomorrow.

This is similar to English, where you would also often use a comma after As for ....

It helps show that the first part sets the topic rather than being part of the core clause structure.

Yes. I morgen means tomorrow, and Danish allows some flexibility in adverb placement.

This sentence has:

• Hvad angår genhusningen, svarer forsikringsselskabet i morgen.

You could also say:

• I morgen svarer forsikringsselskabet, hvad angår genhusningen.
  but that sounds less natural because hvad angår ... usually works best as a topic-setting phrase at the beginning.

A more natural alternative would be:

• Forsikringsselskabet svarer i morgen.
• I morgen svarer forsikringsselskabet.

So yes, i morgen can move, but the original placement is very normal.

Because Danish usually marks definiteness by adding it to the noun.

Compare English and Danish:

• the rehousing = genhusningen
• the insurance company = forsikringsselskabet

The endings depend on the noun’s gender and form:

• common gender nouns often take -en
• neuter nouns often take -et

So:

• genhusning → genhusningen
• forsikringsselskab → forsikringsselskabet

This is one of the biggest structural differences from English.

It is mostly neutral, but it does place special focus on the topic genhusningen by putting it first.

So the sentence is not just saying the insurance company will reply tomorrow. It is saying something more like:

• As for the rehousing, the insurance company will reply tomorrow.

That suggests there may be other issues under discussion, and now the speaker is specifically talking about the rehousing issue.