Breakdown of Vandskaden skyldes rørbruddet.
Questions & Answers about Vandskaden skyldes rørbruddet.
What does skyldes mean here?
In this sentence, skyldes means is due to or is caused by.
A very useful pattern is:
X skyldes Y = X is due to Y
So:
- Vandskaden = the water damage
- skyldes = is due to / is caused by
- rørbruddet = the pipe burst / the pipe rupture
This means the first thing is the result/problem, and the second thing is the cause.
Why is it skyldes and not skylder?
Because skyldes is the form used in this kind of passive-style construction.
Compare:
- skylder = owes in active use
- Jeg skylder ham penge = I owe him money
- skyldes = is due to / is caused by
- Problemet skyldes regnen = The problem is due to the rain
So in your sentence, Danish is not saying something like the water damage owes the pipe burst. It uses the special construction skyldes to express cause.
Is skyldes a passive form?
Yes. It is an -s passive form of skylde.
Danish often makes the passive in two ways:
- with blive
- past participle
- with an -s ending
Here, Danish uses the -s form:
- skyldes
In practice, X skyldes Y is a very common set expression meaning X is due to Y.
Why does one noun end in -en and the other in -et?
Because the two nouns have different grammatical genders.
- en vandskade → vandskaden
- et rørbrud → rørbruddet
So:
- -en is the definite ending for many common gender nouns
- -et is the definite ending for many neuter nouns
The gender comes from the noun itself, so it has to be learned with the word:
- en vandskade
- et rørbrud
Why is there no separate word for the?
Because Danish usually puts the definite article at the end of the noun.
So instead of a separate word like English the, Danish often uses a suffix:
- vandskade = water damage
vandskaden = the water damage
- rørbrud = pipe burst / pipe rupture
- rørbruddet = the pipe burst / the pipe rupture
That is completely normal Danish.
A separate article like den or det is usually added when there is an adjective:
- vandskaden = the water damage
- den alvorlige vandskade = the serious water damage
Which part is the cause, and which part is the result?
In the pattern X skyldes Y:
- X = the thing being explained
- Y = the reason or cause
So here:
- Vandskaden = the result/problem
- rørbruddet = the cause
That is why the sentence means that the water damage happened because of the pipe burst.
Can I switch the nouns around and say Rørbruddet skyldes vandskaden?
You can say that grammatically, but the meaning changes.
- Vandskaden skyldes rørbruddet = The water damage is due to the pipe burst
- Rørbruddet skyldes vandskaden = The pipe burst is due to the water damage
So simply swapping the nouns does not keep the same meaning.
If you want to express the same idea with the pipe burst as subject, Danish would usually use a different verb, for example:
- Rørbruddet forårsagede vandskaden = The pipe burst caused the water damage
Why are vandskade and rørbrud written as one word?
Because Danish, like German, very often forms compound nouns as a single word.
So:
- vand
- skade → vandskade
- rør
- brud → rørbrud
This is very normal in Danish.
The last part is the main word:
- vandskade is a kind of skade
- rørbrud is a kind of brud
That last part also usually determines the gender:
- en skade → en vandskade
- et brud → et rørbrud
What are the dictionary forms of these nouns?
The dictionary forms are the indefinite singular forms:
- en vandskade
- et rørbrud
That is how you would normally look them up.
The sentence uses the definite singular forms:
- vandskaden
- rørbruddet
So when learning vocabulary, it is a good idea to memorize the noun together with its article:
- en vandskade
- et rørbrud
Could I also say Vandskaden er på grund af rørbruddet?
It would probably be understood, but Vandskaden skyldes rørbruddet is the more natural and idiomatic way to say it.
Danish often prefers:
- Vandskaden skyldes rørbruddet
- Vandskaden er forårsaget af rørbruddet
rather than:
- Vandskaden er på grund af rørbruddet
So if you want a clean, standard way to express cause in this kind of sentence, skyldes is an excellent choice.
What tense is this sentence in, and how would it look in the past tense?
The sentence is in the present tense:
- Vandskaden skyldes rørbruddet = The water damage is due to the pipe burst
The past tense is:
- Vandskaden skyldtes rørbruddet = The water damage was due to the pipe burst
So the change is:
- skyldes → skyldtes
How should I think about the pronunciation of y and ø in this sentence?
Those are two vowels that English speakers often find difficult:
- y in skyldes
- ø in rørbruddet
A rough guide:
- y: make an ee sound while rounding your lips
- ø: a rounded front vowel with no exact English equivalent; keep your lips rounded more than you would in most English vowels
You do not need perfect pronunciation right away, but it helps to notice that both are rounded vowels, which is something English uses much less than Danish does.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DanishMaster Danish — from Vandskaden skyldes rørbruddet to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions