Breakdown of Chci vypovědět smlouvu na dobu neurčitou; výpovědní lhůta je měsíc.
Questions & Answers about Chci vypovědět smlouvu na dobu neurčitou; výpovědní lhůta je měsíc.
Why is it Chci vypovědět...? Why do we use chci + an infinitive here?
This is a very common Czech pattern:
- chtít = to want
- vypovědět = to terminate / to give notice to
- chci vypovědět = I want to terminate / give notice to
So Czech, like English, often uses want + infinitive.
A quick mini-pattern:
- Chci odejít. = I want to leave.
- Chci to změnit. = I want to change it.
- Chci vypovědět smlouvu. = I want to terminate the contract.
The form chci is 1st person singular present of chtít.
Why is the verb vypovědět, not vypovídat?
This is mainly about aspect.
- vypovědět is perfective
- vypovídat is imperfective
In this sentence, the speaker wants to perform one complete legal act: terminate the contract. Czech usually prefers the perfective infinitive after chtít, when you mean a completed result.
So:
- Chci vypovědět smlouvu. = I want to terminate the contract.
→ focus on completing the act
By contrast, vypovídat would usually suggest an ongoing, repeated, or process-like action, which is not the normal idea here.
Why is it smlouvu and not smlouva?
Because smlouva is the direct object of vypovědět, so it goes into the accusative case.
- nominative: smlouva
- accusative: smlouvu
You can think of it like this:
- vypovědět co? → smlouvu
This is very typical in Czech: the thing affected by the verb often goes into the accusative.
What exactly is going on in na dobu neurčitou grammatically?
This is a fixed and very common legal/business phrase.
Breakdown:
- na = for / for a period of
- dobu = accusative singular of doba (period, term)
- neurčitou = accusative singular feminine adjective agreeing with dobu
So grammatically:
- na dobu = for a period
- na dobu neurčitou = for an indefinite period
The adjective neurčitou matches dobu, not smlouvu.
That is important: this phrase describes the duration/term, not the noun contract directly at the grammar level.
Why does neurčitou end in -ou?
Because it agrees with dobu, which is:
- feminine
- singular
- accusative
The adjective has to match that.
Comparison:
- nominative: neurčitá doba
- accusative: na neurčitou dobu or na dobu neurčitou
So -ou is the expected feminine singular accusative ending for this adjective pattern.
Why is the phrase na dobu neurčitou used instead of something more literal like bez konce?
Because na dobu neurčitou is the standard Czech expression for legal or contractual indefinite duration.
It is the normal collocation in formal contexts, especially with:
- smlouva na dobu neurčitou = contract for an indefinite period
- pracovní poměr na dobu neurčitou = employment for an indefinite period
A phrase like bez konce would sound much less natural in this kind of official/legal statement.
What is výpovědní lhůta? Why not just výpověď?
These are related, but not the same thing.
- výpověď = notice / termination notice / resignation notice, depending on context
- výpovědní lhůta = notice period
So:
- dát výpověď = to give notice / resign / terminate
- výpovědní lhůta = the period between giving notice and the actual end
The adjective výpovědní means something like relating to notice/termination.
So in the sentence:
- výpovědní lhůta je měsíc = the notice period is one month
Why is it je měsíc and not je měsícem?
After být (to be), Czech often uses the nominative for predicate nouns, especially in modern everyday Czech.
So:
Here měsíc is nominative.
You may also encounter instrumental after být in some contexts, but with statements of this type, nominative is the normal and natural choice.
Compare:
- To je problém.
- Je to chyba.
- Lhůta je měsíc.
Why is there no jeden before měsíc?
Because in Czech, when stating duration, measure, or amount in this kind of sentence, the numeral one is often omitted if it is obvious.
So:
- je měsíc = it is a month / it is one month
Adding jeden is possible for emphasis or contrast, but it is not necessary.
Compare:
- Výpovědní lhůta je měsíc. = The notice period is one month.
- Výpovědní lhůta je jeden měsíc, ne dva. = The notice period is one month, not two.
Could I also say Chci dát výpověď instead of Chci vypovědět smlouvu?
Often yes, but the nuance depends on context.
- dát výpověď is a very common phrase, especially with jobs, rentals, contracts, etc.
- vypovědět smlouvu is a bit more explicit and legal/formal: it directly says terminate the contract
So:
Chci dát výpověď.
= I want to give notice.
This can be slightly broader or more context-dependent.Chci vypovědět smlouvu.
= I want to terminate the contract.
This is very precise.
In legal or administrative language, vypovědět smlouvu is often preferred for clarity.
Is smlouvu na dobu neurčitou one unit, like an open-ended contract?
Yes, functionally it works that way.
Even though the Czech structure is literally more like:
- contract for an indefinite period
the whole phrase behaves like the equivalent of an indefinite/open-ended contract.
This is extremely common in Czech. The contract is identified by the term it is concluded for:
- smlouva na dobu určitou = fixed-term contract
- smlouva na dobu neurčitou = open-ended / indefinite-term contract
Why is the word order Chci vypovědět smlouvu na dobu neurčitou and not something else?
This is the most neutral and natural word order.
Basic structure:
- Chci = I want
- vypovědět = to terminate
- smlouvu = contract
- na dobu neurčitou = of indefinite duration / for an indefinite period
Czech word order is flexible, but the neutral order usually puts the phrase right after the noun it belongs with:
- smlouvu na dobu neurčitou
You could rearrange things in some contexts, but this version is the clearest and most standard.
Why is there a semicolon between the two parts?
Because the sentence contains two closely related independent statements:
A semicolon links them more strongly than a full stop, but keeps them more separate than a comma.
In English, this is similar to:
- I want to terminate an open-ended contract; the notice period is one month.
You could also split them into two sentences in Czech, and that would be fine too.
Is this sentence formal Czech?
Yes, it sounds fairly formal/administrative/legal, especially because of expressions like:
These are standard in contracts, HR, housing, and business communication.
In everyday conversation, people might use shorter or less formal phrasing depending on context, but this sentence is completely natural in official situations.
What is the difference between na dobu neurčitou and na dobu určitou?
They are opposites.
- na dobu neurčitou = for an indefinite period, with no fixed end date
- na dobu určitou = for a fixed period, with a defined end date
For example:
- smlouva na dobu určitou = fixed-term contract
- smlouva na dobu neurčitou = indefinite/open-ended contract
This contrast is extremely important in Czech legal and employment vocabulary.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning CzechMaster Czech — from Chci vypovědět smlouvu na dobu neurčitou; výpovědní lhůta je měsíc to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions