Breakdown of الدليل واضح والتلميح مهم.
Questions & Answers about الدليل واضح والتلميح مهم.
Why is there no word for is in this sentence?
In Arabic, the present-tense verb to be is usually not stated in simple sentences like this.
So:
- الدليل واضح = The evidence is clear
- التلميح مهم = The hint is important
Literally, Arabic often looks like the evidence clear and the hint important, but the meaning naturally includes is.
If you wanted the past tense, you would usually add كان:
- كان الدليل واضحًا = The evidence was clear
What kind of sentence is الدليل واضح والتلميح مهم grammatically?
It is a nominal sentence structure, which is very common in Arabic.
Each part has:
- a subject/topic (مبتدأ)
- a predicate/comment (خبر)
So the sentence breaks down like this:
- الدليل = the subject
- واضح = the predicate
- التلميح = the subject of the second clause
- مهم = the predicate of the second clause
So really this is two nominal clauses joined by و:
- الدليل واضح
- والتلميح مهم
Why don’t واضح and مهم have الـ on them?
Because here they are predicates, not adjectives directly modifying a noun.
Compare:
- الدليل واضح = The evidence is clear
- الدليل الواضح = the clear evidence
That is a very important difference.
In your sentence:
- الدليل is definite: the evidence
- واضح is saying something about it: is clear
So واضح does not take الـ here.
The same applies to:
- التلميح مهم = The hint is important
- التلميح المهم = the important hint
What is the difference between الدليل واضح and الدليل الواضح?
They look similar, but they do different jobs.
- الدليل واضح = a full sentence: The evidence is clear
- الدليل الواضح = a noun phrase: the clear evidence
Why?
Because in Arabic, when an adjective modifies a noun directly, it usually matches it in definiteness:
- definite noun + definite adjective
- indefinite noun + indefinite adjective
So:
- دليل واضح = clear evidence / a clear proof
- الدليل الواضح = the clear evidence
But when the second word is the predicate of a sentence, it does not match like that:
- الدليل واضح = The evidence is clear
Why is there a و attached directly to التلميح with no space?
Because و meaning and is a clitic in Arabic: it attaches directly to the next word.
So Arabic writes:
- والتلميح
not:
- و التلميح
This is normal not only for و, but also for some other short particles in Arabic.
How do you pronounce الدليل and التلميح with الـ?
Although both words are written with الـ, the pronunciation changes because د and ت are sun letters.
So:
- الدليل is pronounced ad-dalīl
- التلميح is pronounced at-talmīḥ
What happens is that the l sound of الـ is not pronounced before a sun letter, and the next consonant is doubled.
So the spelling stays:
- الدليل
- التلميح
but the pronunciation is:
- ad-dalīl
- at-talmīḥ
What would the full vowelled version of this sentence look like?
A fully vowelled version would typically be:
الدليلُ واضحٌ والتلميحُ مهمٌّ
This shows the usual case endings for a simple nominal sentence:
- الدليلُ = nominative
- واضحٌ = nominative
- التلميحُ = nominative
- مهمٌّ = nominative
In this kind of sentence, both the subject and the predicate are normally in the nominative.
In everyday writing, these short vowels are usually omitted, which is why you normally see:
الدليل واضح والتلميح مهم
Why is مهم sometimes written or explained as مهمّ?
Because in fully marked Arabic, the final م has a shadda, which means the consonant is doubled in pronunciation.
So the fuller form is:
- مهمّ = muhimm
In ordinary unvowelled writing, the shadda is often left out, so you may simply see:
- مهم
But the intended pronunciation is still muhimm, not muhim.
Why is the second noun repeated? Why not just say الدليل واضح ومهم?
Because that would mean something different.
- الدليل واضح ومهم = The evidence is clear and important
In that sentence, both واضح and مهم describe الدليل.
But your original sentence has two different subjects:
- الدليل is clear
- التلميح is important
So Arabic repeats the second subject to make that clear:
- الدليل واضح والتلميح مهم
Do واضح and مهم have to agree with the nouns in gender and number?
Yes. Predicates like these normally agree with the subject in gender and number.
In your sentence:
- الدليل is masculine singular
- واضح is masculine singular
and:
- التلميح is masculine singular
- مهم is masculine singular
If the subject were feminine, the predicate would change, for example:
- الفكرة واضحة = The idea is clear
- الإشارة مهمة = The signal/hint is important
So agreement still matters, even though these are predicates rather than attributive adjectives.
Can this sentence be understood as one sentence or two?
Both ways are fine conceptually.
It is usually treated as one sentence made of two coordinated clauses:
- الدليل واضح
- والتلميح مهم
English does the same thing:
- The evidence is clear, and the hint is important.
So it is one combined sentence, but grammatically it contains two simple statements joined by and.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning ArabicMaster Arabic — from الدليل واضح والتلميح مهم to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions