يوقع الوصي التفويض في القنصلية.

A careful MSA reading is:

يُوَقِّعُ الوَصِيُّ التَّفْوِيضَ فِي القُنْصُلِيَّةِ

Transliteration:

yuwaqqiʿu al-waṣiyyu at-tafwīḍa fī al-qunṣuliyyati

A few helpful pronunciation notes:

• يوقّع has a doubled q sound because of the shadda: yu-waq-qiʿu
• التفويض is pronounced at-tafwīḍ, not al-tafwīḍ, because ت is a sun letter
• في makes the following noun genitive, so in full formal reading: القنصليةِ

Because verb–subject–object order is very common in MSA.

So:

• يوقّع الوصي التفويض = a normal verb-first sentence
• الوصي يوقّع التفويض = also correct, but it puts a bit more focus on the guardian

Both are grammatical. The version you have is a very standard neutral MSA pattern.

By itself, يوقّع is in the imperfect form, which can cover several English ideas depending on context:

• signs
• is signing
• sometimes even will sign

In this sentence, without more context, it most naturally means something like signs or is signing.

If Arabic wanted to make the future clearer, it could say:

• سيوقّع = will sign
• سوف يوقّع = will sign

Yes — and this is a very common point of confusion.

The basic root و-ق-ع is associated with meanings like fall or occur. But the verb here is a different derived form:

• وَقَّعَ / يُوَقِّعُ = to sign

So in this sentence, the intended reading is يُوَقِّعُ with a shadda on ق.

This is one reason Arabic can be tricky without vowel marks: يوقع on the page can be ambiguous until context tells you how to read it.

Because the verb already shows a third-person masculine singular subject.

In يوقّع:

• the prefix يـ tells you the subject is he / it

Then Arabic can still state the actual subject noun afterward:

• يوقّع الوصي = the guardian signs

So Arabic does not need a separate pronoun like هو here. Adding هو would usually be unnecessary.

In full formal MSA, the nouns are:

• الوصيُّ = nominative, because it is the subject
• التفويضَ = accusative, because it is the direct object
• القنصليةِ = genitive, because it comes after في

So the fully vocalized structure is:

يُوَقِّعُ الوَصِيُّ التَّفْوِيضَ فِي القُنْصُلِيَّةِ

In normal unvowelled writing, you usually do not see these case endings, but they are still part of formal grammar.

Because the verb وقّع can take the thing being signed as a direct object.

So:

• وقّعَ التفويضَ = he signed the authorization/document

This is normal Arabic.

You may also see:

• وقّع على التفويض

That is also possible in many contexts. But in your sentence, the direct-object pattern is straightforward and natural.

في is the standard preposition for in or at a place.

So:

• في القنصلية = in the consulate or at the consulate

In English, at the consulate may sound more natural, but Arabic often uses في very normally for this kind of location.

Because الـ makes them definite:

• الوصي = the guardian
• التفويض = the authorization / the power of attorney / the document

This suggests we are talking about a specific guardian and a specific authorization, not just any guardian or any authorization.

If they were indefinite, you would expect something like:

• وصيٌّ
• تفويضًا

الوصي usually has a fairly formal or legal meaning, such as:

• guardian
• custodian
• trustee
• someone legally responsible for another person or for certain affairs

So this is not just any helper or relative. It usually refers to a person with some recognized responsibility or authority.

Because ت is a sun letter.

When الـ comes before a sun letter, the l sound is not pronounced, and the next consonant is doubled.

So:

• written: التفويض
• pronounced: at-tafwīḍ

By contrast, in القنصلية, ق is a moon letter, so the l is pronounced:

• al-qunṣuliyya

This sun-letter/moon-letter pattern is very important for reading Arabic aloud naturally.