هو قال الحقيقة.

A common Egyptian pronunciation is:

huwwa ʔāl il-ḥaʔīʔa

A rough guide:

• هو = huwwa = he
• قال = ʔāl = said
• الحقيقة = il-ḥaʔīʔa = the truth

A few sound notes:

• The ق sound is often pronounced as a glottal stop ʔ in Egyptian Arabic, so قال sounds like ʔāl, not qāl.
• ح in الحقيقة is a deeper, breathier h sound than English h.
• The ال article is usually pronounced il- or el- in Egyptian speech.

Here is the breakdown:

• هو = he
• قال = said / told
• الحقيقة = the truth

So grammatically:

• هو is the subject pronoun.
• قال is the past tense verb.
• الحقيقة is the direct object.

Because Arabic verbs already show the subject, قال by itself can mean he said.

So:

• قال الحقيقة = he said/told the truth
• هو قال الحقيقة = he said/told the truth, but with extra emphasis on he

Adding هو can make the subject clearer, more contrastive, or more natural in context, especially if you are talking about several people and want to stress that he was the one who told the truth.

Yes. قال الحقيقة is perfectly possible and natural.

In Egyptian Arabic, subject pronouns are often omitted when the verb already makes the subject clear. Since قال is he said, the sentence still works without هو.

The version with هو is often used when:

• you want emphasis
• you are contrasting him with someone else
• you want to make the subject explicit

Because the sentence means the truth, not a truth.

• الحقيقة = the truth
• حقيقة = a truth / truth in a more indefinite sense

Also, in Egyptian Arabic, the definite article ال is usually pronounced il- or el-, so الحقيقة is commonly said as il-ḥaʔīʔa or el-ḥaʔīʔa.

Literally, it is closer to said the truth, but in natural English the best translation is usually told the truth.

This is a good example of where a word-for-word translation is less natural than an idiomatic one. Arabic uses قال here, but English normally says tell the truth, not say the truth.

Yes, هو قال الحقيقة is normal.

In Egyptian Arabic, it is very common to begin with the subject pronoun and then put the verb after it:

• هو قال الحقيقة

You can also say:

• قال الحقيقة

But قال هو الحقيقة is not the normal neutral order for this meaning. Putting هو there would sound unusual unless there were a very specific emphasis structure in context.

قال is the past tense, third person masculine singular form of the verb to say.

So it means:

• قال = he said

This verb is a common and important one, and its forms include:

• قلت = I said
• قالت = she said
• قالوا = they said

Because it is a so-called hollow verb, some of its forms change shape more than regular verbs do.

It could be understood in both, but the pronunciation and style differ.

In Egyptian Arabic, you would typically hear something like:

• huwwa ʔāl il-ḥaʔīʔa

In Standard Arabic, it would be pronounced more like:

• huwa qāla al-ḥaqīqa

So the written sentence looks very similar, but the spoken Egyptian pronunciation is different, especially in:

• هو → huwwa
• ق → often ʔ
• ال → usually il-/el-

Yes, mainly the sounds.

The tricky parts are:

• ح: not a normal English h; it comes deeper from the throat
• ق: in Egyptian Arabic, usually a glottal stop ʔ
• the rhythm of the word: il-ḥaʔīʔa

If you say something like el-ha-EE-a with two little catches in the throat where the ʔ sounds are, you will be getting close.