Kampaaja aikoo syventää sävyä, joskin en ole varma.

Questions & Answers about Kampaaja aikoo syventää sävyä, joskin en ole varma.

How does the suffix in "syventää" change the meaning of the root word?
The root is the adjective syvä (deep). By adding the suffix -ntää (or -ntaa for back-vowel harmony), we create an active, transitive verb meaning "to make [adjective]." So, syventää means "to make deeper" or "to deepen." Because it is a transitive verb, it requires an object—someone is directly doing the action to something else.
Why is the object "sävyä" in the partitive case here?
Using the partitive sävyä (instead of the total object sävyn) shows that the change is relative or partial—the hairdresser is going to deepen the shade by "some amount." Verbs that adjust, alter, or change a state (like syventää or suurentaa) very often take a partitive object to show that the action doesn't have an absolute, finalized endpoint.
What is "joskin" and is it used differently than "vaikka"?
Joskin translates to "although" or "albeit" and is formed by combining jos (if) with the clitic -kin (also/even). While it means almost the same thing as vaikka (even though), joskin is slightly more formal and is perfectly suited for tacking on a reservation, concession, or afterthought at the end of a sentence.
Why is it "en ole varma" instead of "en ole varmaa" in a negative sentence?
This is a classic trap! When an adjective describes a human subject (like the hidden "I" here), it stays in the nominative case: en ole varma (I am not sure). You would only use the partitive varmaa if the subject were an abstract concept or an "it" sentence, such as se ei ole varmaa (it is not certain).

Learn Kampaaja aikoo syventää sävyä, joskin en ole varma and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free