Valmistautumaton ehdokas on usein surkea ongelmanratkaisussa.

Questions & Answers about Valmistautumaton ehdokas on usein surkea ongelmanratkaisussa.

Why is ongelmanratkaisussa in the inessive (-ssa) case?
This is driven by the adjective surkea (terrible or lousy). In Finnish, when an adjective expresses a level of skill or proficiency, the area of competence requires the inessive case. You will see this exact same pattern with words like hyvä (good), huono (bad), and taitava (skilled).
How would this sentence end if I used the verb 'to solve' instead of the noun 'problem-solving'?
You would use the 4th infinitive in the inessive case (-misessa). The verb is ratkaista (to solve). Its 4th infinitive form is ratkaiseminen, which becomes ratkaisemisessa. The object 'problems' would move to the plural genitive, making the phrase ongelmien ratkaisemisessa.
How is the adjective valmistautumaton formed?
It is the negative participle of the verb valmistautua (to prepare oneself). The suffix -maton (or -mätön) is added to the strong stem of the verb, turning it into an adjective that means 'unprepared' or 'not having prepared'.
Could I use huono instead of surkea here?
Yes, huono ongelmanratkaisussa is grammatically identical and simply means 'bad at problem-solving'. Surkea is just a stronger, more expressive word, meaning 'terrible', 'lousy', or 'miserable'. Both trigger the exact same inessive rection.

Learn Valmistautumaton ehdokas on usein surkea ongelmanratkaisussa and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free