Breakdown of On oikeutettua, että hyväksyttävät teot tuottavat iloa.
olla
to be
että
that (conjunction)
ilo
joy
tuottaa
to produce
teko
act
hyväksyttävä
acceptable
oikeutettu
justified
Questions & Answers about On oikeutettua, että hyväksyttävät teot tuottavat iloa.
Why is oikeutettua in the partitive case here rather than the nominative?
This connects directly to this lesson's focus. The subject of the sentence is the entire että clause. Because being 'justified' expresses a human evaluation or judgment rather than a strict factual truth-value (like 'true' or 'clear'), the adjective describing the clause takes the partitive case (oikeutettua).
What form is the adjective hyväksyttävät?
It is the present passive participle of the verb hyväksyä (to accept). In Finnish, this participle form is often used as an adjective that translates to '-able' in English, making hyväksyttävä mean 'acceptable'. Here, it takes the plural suffix -t to match the noun it modifies, teot.
What is the base form of teot (actions), and why does its stem change?
The nominative singular is teko. Adding the plural marker -t closes the final syllable, which triggers consonant gradation. The strong grade 'k' weakens and disappears completely, leaving the plural stem teo-, which gives us teot.
Why is the object iloa (joy) in the partitive case instead of the accusative?
Because ilo is an abstract concept and an uncountable noun. When verbs like tuottaa (to produce) take an abstract feeling as an object, it must be in the partitive case to show that the action produces an undefined amount of joy, rather than a single, complete unit of it.
Learn On oikeutettua, että hyväksyttävät teot tuottavat iloa and more in Finnish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free