Breakdown of Tuleeko kuolleisuus olemaan matala?
olla
to be
matala
shallow, low
tulla
will (future auxiliary)
kuolleisuus
mortality
Questions & Answers about Tuleeko kuolleisuus olemaan matala?
How does the future tense construction work in this sentence?
This sentence uses the analytical future construction: the verb tulla plus the 3rd infinitive illative (the -maan/-mään form). Here, we have tulee (with the question particle) combined with olemaan (from olla, to be). While Finnish usually just uses the present tense to express the future, this construction is used to make firm, objective predictions about things outside of direct human control, like statistical rates.
Why is the question particle -ko attached to tuleeko and not olemaan?
In basic yes/no questions, the -ko/-kö particle attaches to the primary conjugated verb, which is then moved to the front of the sentence. Since tulla acts as the auxiliary verb carrying the tense and person, it takes the question particle, leaving the main verb olemaan in its infinitive form later in the sentence.
How is the noun kuolleisuus formed?
It is derived from the verb kuolla (to die). It builds on the past participle kuollut (dead). By taking its stem and adding the suffix -suus (which creates abstract nouns of quality or state, much like "-ness" or "-ity" in English), we get kuolleisuus, meaning "mortality" or "death rate."
Why is the adjective matala in the nominative case instead of the partitive?