Question 1

I see sovitella here instead of sopia. How are these verbs related?

Accepted Answer

Sovitella is a derivative of sopia. While sopia usually means "to fit," "to agree," or "to be suitable" (often used with an experiencer, like se sopii minulle), sovitella has a more active, continuous meaning like "to adjust," "to coordinate," or "to reconcile." The -ella ending makes it a frequentative verb, implying an ongoing or back-and-forth process of trying to make things fit together.

Question 2

Since sopia takes the allative case (e.g., minulle), does sovitella take it too?

Accepted Answer

No, it behaves differently. Sopia in the sense of "to suit" is an intransitive verb pointing to who it suits (hence the allative). Sovitella, however, is a transitive verb—meaning you are actively doing something to an object (coordinating the schedules). Because it takes a direct object, the schedules are put into an object case like the partitive, rather than the allative.

Question 3

Why is the object aikatauluja in the partitive plural instead of the accusative plural (aikataulut)?

Accepted Answer

The partitive plural aikatauluja is used because the action of "coordinating" or "juggling" schedules is viewed as an open-ended, continuous process. You are tweaking and adjusting them. If you used the accusative plural aikataulut, it would imply a definitive, completed action where all schedules are finalized right then and there.

Question 4

Why is the word for "time" in the form kerran?

Accepted Answer

Kerran is the genitive-accusative form of kerta (time or occasion). The phrase vielä kerran is a standard fixed expression meaning "one more time" or "yet once." Since it represents a specific, whole amount (exactly one time), it takes this accusative form.

Voimmeko sovitella aikatauluja vielä kerran?

Breakdown of Voimmeko sovitella aikatauluja vielä kerran?

Questions & Answers about Voimmeko sovitella aikatauluja vielä kerran?

Learn Voimmeko sovitella aikatauluja vielä kerran and more in Finnish